Cited by 28Adolescent and Pediatric HealthcareChild and Adolescent HealthHealthcare Policy and Management

Care Coordination Impacts on Access to Care for Children with Special Health Care Needs Enrolled in Medicaid and CHIP

Miller, Kipyn·2014·Maternal and Child Health Journal

Abstract

Children with special health care needs (CSHCN) often require services from multiple health care providers. This study's objective is to evaluate whether CSHCN, enrolled in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and receiving care coordination services, experience improved access to mental and specialty health care services. Using data from the 2009-2010 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, two separate outcomes are used to evaluate children's access to care: receipt of needed mental and specialty care and timely access to services. Using propensity score matching, CSHCN propensity for receiving care coordination services is derived and an assessment is made of care coordination's impact on the receipt of health care and whether care is delayed. Results demonstrate that care coordination is positively associated with whether a child receives the mental and specialty care that they need, regardless of whether or not that coordination is perceived to be adequate by parents. However, receiving care coordination services that parents perceive to be adequate has a larger impact on the timeliness in which care is received. This study indicates that care coordination is associated with an increased ability for CSHCN to access needed mental and specialty care. States should consider offering care coordination services that support provider communication and fulfill families' coordination needs to the CSHCN enrolled in their Medicaid and CHIP…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-013-1312-z

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, K.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Kipyn
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published
2013-06-23
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
864-872
ISSN
  • 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6628
OpenAlex
W2102704361
Cited by
28
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
care coordination, children with special health care needs, access to mental health care, access to specialist care, Medicaid, State Children's Health Insurance Program, timeliness of care, provider communication, parental attitudes, health care access disparities
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Health Services, Child, Exceptional, Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Insurance, Health, Male, Medicaid, Organizational Innovation, United States, Program Evaluation, Databases, Factual, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Surveys, Disabled Children, Children with Disabilities, Interdisciplinary Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review