Cited by 6High-pressure geophysics and materialsSeismic Waves and AnalysisSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques

Effects of upper mantle structure beneath Alaska on core-sensitive seismic wave absolute and differential measurements: Implications for estimates of inner core anisotropy

Open access
Frost, Daniel A., Romanowicz, Barbara·2021·Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors

Abstract

Inner core anisotropy is often studied using differential travel times between the inner core phase, PKPdf, and one of two outer core phases, either PKPbc or PKPab, to eliminate contamination by crust and upper mantle structure. In particular, given the similarity of the two ray paths in the shallow Earth, the PKPbc-df differential travel time is assumed to robustly reflect the structure of the inner core, and not be influenced by mantle structure. Measurements of PKPab-df and PKPbc-df differential times reveal that the inner core is anisotropic: PKPdf rays travel through the inner core ~3% faster along polar paths than along equatorial paths. Even so, measurements of both PKPbc-df and PKPab-df differential travel times on quasi-polar paths between sources in the South Sandwich Islands and stations in Alaska present greater scatter (6 s spread) than other equivalent quasi-polar paths from other parts of the globe (2 s spread). While the South Sandwich Islands to Alaska data help increase spatial sampling of the inner core, including these data in inner core models significantly increases estimates of average global inner core anisotropy strength, by more than 1%. Whether this reflects real spatial variability in the strength of inner core anisotropy or else results from complexity outside of the inner core is uncertain but is crucial for constraining the inner core composition and growth history. Using a regional tomographic model of the Alaskan upper mantle to predict upper…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pepi.2021.106713

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data along the SSI-Alaska path has often been questioned for possible influences from mantle structures, particularly subducted slabs beneath Alaska, which could affect dt_res by up to 0.5 s.

    “In addition, data along the SSI-Alaska path has often been questioned for the possible influences from the mantle structures, particularly the subducted slabs beneath Alaska, which could affect dt res by up to 0.5 s (Frost & Romanowicz, 2021), suggesting that some of the observed complexity in dt res may arise not only from IC structures but also from slab effects.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frost, D. A., & Romanowicz, B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Institut de physique du globe de Paris (FR)
Corresponding author
Frost, Daniel A.
Venue
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
315
Pages
106713
ISSN
0031-9201 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3154531639
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Physics of The Earth and Planetary Interiors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • National Science Foundation (EAR-2027181, EAR-1829283, EAR-1135452, EAR-1261681)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Keywords
inner core anisotropy, differential travel times, upper mantle structure, South Sandwich Islands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review