Cited by 9Renin-Angiotensin System StudiesReproductive Biology and FertilityOvarian function and disorders

Genetic deletion of the Angiotensin-(1–7) receptor Mas leads to a reduced ovulatory rate

Honorato-Sampaio, Kinulpe, Andrade, Renato Ferreira, Bader, Michael, Martins, Almir de Souza, Santos, Robson Augusto Souza, Reis, Adelina Martha·2018·Peptides

Abstract

Angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)] is a component of Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) that acts through activation of the G-protein-coupled receptor Mas. Recent studies highlight Ang-(1-7) as an intermediate of gonadotropin in ovarian physiology. Genetically Mas-deficient mice allow the investigation of Ang-(1-7) in the ovulatory process. Therefore, the present study aimed to analyze the effects of Mas gene deletion on ovulation to confirm our hypothesis that Mas Knockout (Mas-KO) mice exhibit impairment in the ovulatory outcome. First, we evaluated the breeding data from our animal facilities and from a breeding experiment. The ovulation was observed directly from oviducts after a superovulation protocol and in the estrus morning. We also checked the follicular pool and mRNA expression of Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in ovaries to investigate a possible reason underlying the reduced ovulation. Mas-KO mice showed a reduced litter size and decreased spontaneous ovulatory rate. Ovarian stimulation by gonadotropins reversed ovulation outcome in Mas-KO mice. Mas deficiency also promoted a reduced ovarian follicular pool and lower IGF-1 mRNA levels, suggesting that Mas receptor plays a role in the survival of ovarian follicle. The reduction of ovulatory rate highlights the relevance of Ang-(1-7)/Mas axis in female reproduction, probably through a reduction of IGF-1 mRNA levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.peptides.2018.08.007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Honorato-Sampaio, K., Andrade, R. F., Bader, M., Martins, A. D. S., Santos, R. A. S., & Reis, A. M.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Venue
Peptides
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
107
Pages
83-88
ISSN
0196-9781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886123624
Cited by
9
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Peptides (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico/CNPq
  • Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais/FAPEMIG
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior/CAPES
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
angiotensin-(1-7), Mas receptor, ovulation, renin-angiotensin system, female reproduction, insulin-like growth factor I, litter size, gonadotropin stimulation, superovulation
MeSH terms
Proto-Oncogene Mas, Angiotensin I, Animals, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Ovarian Follicle, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Ovulation, Peptide Fragments, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Renin-Angiotensin System, Gene Deletion, Mice, Knockout, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review