Cited by 12Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

The mediation by GLP-1 receptors of glucagon-induced insulin secretion revisited in GLP-1 receptor knockout mice

Open access
Ahrén, Bo, Yamada, Yuichiro, Seino, Yutaka·2021·Peptides

Abstract

To study whether activation of GLP-1 receptors importantly contributes to the insulinotropic action of exogenously administered glucagon, we have performed whole animal experiments in normal mice and in mice with GLP-1 receptor knockout. Glucagon (1, 3 or 10 μg/kg), the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin 9-39 (30 nmol/kg), glucose (0.35 g/kg) or the incretin hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP; 3 nmol/kg) was injected intravenously or glucose (75 mg) was given orally through gavage. Furthermore, islets were isolated and incubated in the presence of glucose with or without glucagon. It was found that the insulin response to intravenous glucagon was preserved in GLP-1 receptor knockout mice but that glucagon-induced insulin secretion was markedly suppressed in islets from GLP-1 receptor knockout mice. Similarly, the GLP-1 receptor antagonist markedly suppressed glucagon-induced insulin secretion in wildtype mice. These data suggest that GLP-1 receptors contribute to the insulinotropic action of glucagon and that there is a compensatory mechanism in GLP-1 receptor knockout mice that counteracts a reduced effect of glucagon. Two potential compensatory mechanisms (glucose and GIP) were explored. However, neither of these seemed to explain why the insulin response to glucagon is not suppressed in GLP-1 receptor knockout mice. Based on these data we confirm the hypothesis that glucagon-induced insulin secretion is partially mediated by GLP-1 receptors on the beta cells and we propose that a compensatory mechanism, the nature of which remains to be established, is induced in GLP-1 receptor knockout mice to counteract the expected impaired insulin response to glucagon in these mice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.peptides.2020.170434

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro potency and preclinical efficacy data directly assessing the relationships between receptor potency ratios are lacking and confounded by the apparent reduction in potency of GIPR agonists in rodents and the compensatory sensitization of incretin receptors in genetic knockout mouse lines.

    “However, in vitro potency and preclinical efficacy data directly assessing these relationships is lacking and confounded by the apparent reduction in potency of GIPR agonists in rodents [61] and the compensatory sensitization of incretin receptors in genetic knockout mouse lines [62,63].”

    From Next generation GLP-1/GIP/glucagon triple agonists normalize body weight in obese mice (2022) · cites this paper as [63]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahrén, B., Yamada, Y., & Seino, Y.
Affiliations
  • Akita University (JP)
  • Kansai Electric Power (Japan) (JP)
Venue
Peptides
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
135
Pages
170434
ISSN
0196-9781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093756511
Cited by
12
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Peptides (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Medicinska Fakulteten, Lunds Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor, glucagon, insulin secretion, pancreatic beta cells, exendin-9-39, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, compensatory mechanisms, pancreatic islets, incretins
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Insulin Secretion, Animals, Blood Glucose, Disease Models, Animal, Glucagon, Glucose, Humans, Insulin, Pancreas, Peptide Fragments, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Mice, Knockout, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review