Cited by 8Drilling and Well EngineeringEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis

Advanced analytics of self-colmatation in terrigenous oil reservoirs

Orlov, Denis, Koroteev, Dmitry·2019·Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106306

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orlov, D., & Koroteev, D.
Affiliations
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
Corresponding author
Orlov, Denis
Venue
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
182
Pages
106306
ISSN
0920-4105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964824150
Cited by
8
References
22
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Keywords
formation damage, fines migration, permeability reduction, machine learning prediction, random forest, gradient boosting, artificial neural networks, drill core sample, waterflooding, injectivity decline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review