Polymorphisms affecting gene regulation and mRNA processing: Broad implications for pharmacogenetics
Abstract
Functional polymorphisms that alter gene expression and mRNA processing appear to play a critical role in shaping human phenotypic variability. Intensive studies on polymorphisms affecting drug response have revealed multiple modes of altered gene function, frequently involving cis-acting regulatory sequence variants. Experimental and in silico methods have advanced the search for such polymorphisms, but considerable challenges remain. Here, a survey of polymorphisms in drug-related genes indicates that: (a) a substantial proportion of genetic variability still remains unaccounted for; (b) a majority of these genes harbors known regulatory polymorphisms; and (c) a portion of polymorphisms affect splicing and mRNA turnover. Pharmacogenetic optimiziation of individual drug therapy may require a complete understanding of all functional sequence variants in key genes. This review surveys known noncoding polymorphisms in genes encoding cytochrome P450s and other drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters, and drug targets and receptors. Current methods and challenges associated with the identification and characterization of functional polymorphisms are also discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In prairie voles, a microsatellite in the 5' flanking region of Avpr1a containing cis-regulatory elements has functional influence over species differences and individual variation in Avpr1a expression and is associated with variation in social behavior.
“In prairie voles, a microsatellite in the 5’ flanking region of the vasopressin receptor gene (Avpr1a) containing cis-REs has been shown to have functional influence over species differences and individual variation in Avpr1a expression and is associated with variation in social behavior (47, 48).”
From Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region–Specific Expression and Social Attachment (2016) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 251 · Cited by 97
- Authors
- JOHNSON, A., WANG, D., & SADEE, W.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- JOHNSON, A
- ORCID
- WANG, D
- Venue
- Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-38
- ISSN
- 0163-7258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011562383
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 251
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ohio State University
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA018744, R21DA018744)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
- Keywords
- functional polymorphisms, gene expression regulation, mRNA processing, splicing, mRNA turnover, pharmacogenetics, drug response variability, cytochrome P450, drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters, genetic variation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Binding Sites, Biotransformation, Carrier Proteins, Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Pharmacogenetics, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Genetic, RNA, Messenger
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review