Cited by 197Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region–Specific Expression and Social Attachment

Open access
King, Lanikea B., Walum, Hasse, Inoue, Kiyoshi, Eyrich, Nicholas W., Young, Larry J.·2016·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Oxytocin (OXT) modulates several aspects of social behavior. Intranasal OXT is a leading candidate for treating social deficits in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and common genetic variants in the human oxytocin receptor (OXTR) are associated with emotion recognition, relationship quality and ASD. Animal models have revealed that individual differences in Oxtr expression in the brain drive social behavior variation. Our understanding of how genetic variation contributes to brain OXTR expression is very limited. Methods We investigated Oxtr expression in monogamous prairie voles, which have a well characterized OXT system. We quantified brain region-specific levels of Oxtr mRNA and OXTR protein with established neuroanatomical methods. We used pyrosequencing to investigate allelic imbalance of Oxtr mRNA, a molecular signature of polymorphic genetic regulatory elements. We performed next-generation sequencing to discover variants in and near the Oxtr gene. We investigated social attachment using the partner preference test. Results Our allelic imbalance data demonstrates that genetic variants contribute to individual differences in Oxtr expression, but only in particular brain regions, including the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), where OXTR signaling facilitates social attachment. Next-generation sequencing identified one polymorphism in the Oxtr intron, near a putative cis-regulatory element, explaining 74% of the variance in striatal Oxtr expression specifically. Males homozygous for the high expressing allele display enhanced social attachment. Discussion Taken together, these findings provide convincing evidence for robust genetic influence on Oxtr expression and provide novel insights into how non-coding polymorphisms in the OXTR might influence individual differences in human social cognition and behavior

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In prairie voles, non-coding variation in the oxytocin receptor gene predicts brain-region-specific Oxtr expression and OXTR density, especially in the nucleus accumbens. An intronic SNP, NT213739, explains at least 74% of the variance in NAcc OXTR density and is associated with mating-induced partner preference formation in males.

Key findings

  • Oxtr allelic imbalance was strongest in striatal regions: in heterozygous voles, the T-allele transcript was 3–5 times more prevalent than the C-allele in NAcc (cDNA ratio 3.16; gDNA threshold 1.11) and CP (cDNA ratio 5.24; gDNA threshold 1.13), with a lesser effect in amygdala (cDNA ratio 1.19; gDNA threshold 1.14).
  • Sequencing 70 kb around Oxtr in 45 voles identified 967 SNPs; 15 SNPs in linkage disequilibrium spanning 30 kb were associated with NAcc OXTR density at P=1.06×10−15, adjusted R²=0.78.
  • The intronic SNP NT213739 was robustly associated with NAcc OXTR density across independent samples (all P-values <4×10−10; adjusted R²≥74%) and with Oxtr mRNA levels; it was not associated with insular cortex OXTR density.
  • In the partner preference test, C/C males spent significantly more time huddling with the partner than the stranger, whereas C/T and T/T males failed to display a partner preference.

Methods

  • Prairie voles from a laboratory breeding colony were used for brain-region-specific measures of Oxtr mRNA and OXTR protein via in situ hybridization and autoradiography, with sample sizes including N=31 for autoradiography and N=31 for in situ hybridization.
  • Allelic imbalance was assayed by pyrosequencing in animals heterozygous for the 3′UTR SNP NT204321 (minor allele frequency 0.33); next-generation sequencing of 70 kb surrounding Oxtr was performed in 45 voles, followed by genotyping of NT213739 in additional samples (n=35 and n=31).
  • Associations between genetic markers and brain data used linear regression with Bonferroni correction, factor analysis for brain-region covariation, and PLINK/SEQ for SNP–autoradiography associations; social attachment was assessed with the partner preference test.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the genotype–phenotype relationships do not implicate NT213739 above other SNPs in perfect LD spanning 30 kb, and that larger samples of more genetically diverse animals, including wild-caught specimens, may be needed to break the haplotype structure and identify the functional SNP.
  • The paper notes that cross-species comparisons of putative regulatory elements should be interpreted cautiously because transcription factor binding sites may differ between species.
  • Evident from the text: the study reports strong associations but does not perform direct functional validation such as ChIP-seq, chromosome conformation capture, or in vitro transcription assays; the behavioral sample size for the partner preference test is not stated in the provided text.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.12.008

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 89 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Sequencing 70 kb around Oxtr in 45 voles identified 967 SNPs with read depth at least 100, quality score at least 1000, all variable in the sample.

    “Amongst the 45 voles we sequenced, we identified 967 SNPs with a read depth no lower than 100 reads, a quality score of at least 1000, and for which all were variable in our sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In heterozygous animals for NT204321, significant allelic imbalance occurred in the nucleus accumbens, caudate putamen, and to a lesser degree amygdala.

    “In heterozygous animals for this SNP, we found significant allelic imbalance in NAcc (cDNA: 3.16, gDNA threshold: 1.11), caudate putamen (CP) (cDNA: 5.24, gDNA threshold: 1.13) and to a lesser degree, amygdala (Amyg) (cDNA: 1.19, gDNA threshold: 1.14).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    A second factor analysis in an additional sample (N=85) also revealed two factors explaining most of the variance.

    “We performed a second factor analysis in an additional sample (N=85) (Table 1b) and this analysis, like the first one, revealed two factors explaining most of the variance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Due to linkage disequilibrium, 15 SNPs spanning 30 kb were associated with nucleus accumbens OXTR density with the same minimal P-value (P=1.06×10−15, adjusted R2=0.78).

    “Due to linkage disequilibrium, 15 SNPs spanning a 30 kb region were associated with NAcc OXTR density with the same, minimal P-value (P=1.06×10−15, adjusted R2=0.78), which is a remarkable effect size for a genotype-phenotype relationship.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the nucleus accumbens and caudate putamen, the T-allele transcript was 3-5 times more prevalent than the C-allele in heterozygous animals.

    “The allelic imbalance was pronounced in the two striatal sub-regions, NAcc and CP, with the T-allele transcript being 3–5 times more prevalent than the C-allele in the same animals in these regions (Figure 1d).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 23
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nucleus accumbens OXTR binding was almost perfectly correlated with Factor 1, and insular cortex binding was close to perfectly correlated with Factor 2.

    “OXTR binding in the NAcc was almost perfectly correlated with the first factor and binding in the insular cortex (Ins) was close to perfectly correlated with Factor 2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In two additional samples (n=35, n=31), NT213739 was robustly associated with OXTR density in the nucleus accumbens but not the insular cortex.

    “After genotyping additional voles (Sample 2 n=35, Sample 3 n=31) for NT213739, we confirmed the SNP was robustly associated with OXTR density in the NAcc but not in the Ins (Figure 4a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Factor 1 reflected co-variability among reward-processing regions (nucleus accumbens, caudate putamen, olfactory tubercle), while Factor 2 reflected covariation among cortical and subcortical regions with relatively uniform OXTR density.

    “Factor 1 strongly reflects co-variability in a set of regions involved in reward processing (NAcc, CP, and olfactory tubercle) while the second factor reflects covariation between cortical and subcortical regions that have relatively uniform levels of OXTR density (Table 1a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nucleus accumbens OXTR density values did not overlap between homozygotes for the two NT213739 genotypes, and heterozygotes had an intermediate phenotype.

    “The effect was marked, such that OXTR density values in the NAcc between homozygous animals of the two genotypes did not overlap at all while heterozygous animals displayed an intermediate phenotype.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The effect size of NT213739 on nucleus accumbens OXTR expression was large in all samples (adjusted R2≥74%), suggesting it explains at least 74% of the variance.

    “Similarly, the effect size of this association was very large in all samples (adjusted R2≥74%), strongly suggesting that NT213739 explains at least 74% of the variance in NAcc expression of OXTR in prairie voles.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Allelic imbalance is strongest in the striatum and genotype-OXTR associations are most robust in this region.

    “Allelic imbalance is strongest in the striatum and genotype-OXTR associations are most robust in this region.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was a significant effect of NT213739 genotype on partner preference formation: C/C males spent significantly more time huddling with the partner than the stranger, while C/T and T/T males did not display a partner preference.

    “There was a significant effect of genotype on partner preference formation, with C/C voles spending significantly more time huddling with the partner than the stranger, while C/T and T/T males failed to display a partner preference (Figure 5).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Noncoding SNPs in the human OXTR are associated with pair bonding, parenting, face recognition, and autism.

    “Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in noncoding regions of the human OXTR have been associated with pair bonding behaviors (19), parenting (1), face recognition skills (20), and autism (21).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [19] Walum, 2012, Variation in the oxytocin receptor gene is associated with pair-bonding and social behavior, Biol Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [1] Rilling, 2014, The biology of mammalian parenting and its effect on offspring social development, Science source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [20] Skuse, 2014, Common polymorphism in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with human social recognition skills, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    OXTR is distributed throughout the brain of many vertebrates, and its distribution pattern differs between species.

    “OXTR is distributed throughout the brain of many vertebrates and, importantly, the pattern of OXTR distribution is diverse between species (32, 33).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [32] Donaldson, 2008, Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality, Science source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [33] Freeman, 2014, The neuroanatomical distribution of oxytocin receptor binding and mRNA in the male rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta), Psychoneuroendocrinology source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some individuals show heterogeneous responses to oxytocin, which may involve interaction with OXTR genetic polymorphisms.

    “Some individuals have heterogeneous responses to OXT (22, 23), which may involve interaction with OXTR genetic polymorphisms (24–27).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [22] Bartz, 2011, Social effects of oxytocin in humans: Context and person matter, Trends Cogn Sci

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [23] Olff, 2013, The role of oxytocin in social bonding, stress regulation and mental health: An update on the moderating effects of context and interindividual differences, Psychoneuroendocrinology source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] Marsh, 2012, The influence of oxytocin administration on responses to infant faces and potential moderation by OXTR genotype, Psychopharmacology source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25] Montag, 2013, An interaction between oxytocin and a genetic variation of the oxytocin receptor modulates amygdala activity toward direct gaze: Evidence from a pharmacological imaging genetics study, Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [26] Chen, 2015, Genetic modulation of oxytocin sensitivity: A pharmacogenetic approach, Transl Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [27] Feng, 2015, A common oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) polymorphism modulates intranasal oxytocin effects on the neural response to social cooperation in humans, Genes Brain Behav source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Oxytocin receptor signaling influences several social behaviors in animals, including maternal care and bonding, social reward and gregariousness, social recognition, and pair bonding in monogamous species.

    “OXTR affects a range of social behaviors in animals including maternal nurturing and bonding (1, 2), social reward and gregariousness (3, 4), social recognition (5), and pair bonding in monogamous species (6–8).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [1] Rilling, 2014, The biology of mammalian parenting and its effect on offspring social development, Science source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [2] Numan, 2016, Neural mechanisms of mother-infant bonding and pair bonding: Similarities, differences, and broader implications, Horm Behav source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [3] Dolen, 2013, Social reward requires coordinated activity of nucleus accumbens oxytocin and serotonin, Nature source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] Goodson, 2009, Mesotocin and nonapeptide receptors promote estrildid flocking behavior, Science source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] Young, 2004, The neurobiology of pair bonding, Nat Neurosci source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] Goodson, 2012, Evolving nonapeptide mechanisms of gregariousness and social diversity in birds, Horm Behav source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] Johnson, 2015, Neural networks involved in social attachment and pair bonding, Curr Opin Behav Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Early life stress in humans can interact with OXTR variation to influence adult social behavior and emotional regulation.

    “Early life stress in humans can interact with OXTR variation to influence adult social behavior and emotional regulation (28–31).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [28] Loth, 2014, Oxytocin receptor genotype modulates ventral striatal activity to social cues and response to stressful life events, Biol Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [29] Lucas-Thompson, 2013, Environmental stress, oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) polymorphism, and mental health following collective stress, Horm Behav source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [30] Smearman, 2015, Social stress and the oxytocin receptor gene interact to predict antisocial behavior in an at-risk cohort, Dev Psychopathol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [31] Thompson, 2011, Oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism (rs2254298) interacts with familial risk for psychopathology to predict symptoms of depression and anxiety in adolescent girls, Psychoneuroendocrinology source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    OXTR is often enriched in regions of crucial behavioral circuits such as the mesolimbic reward network and social decision-making network, and appears to modulate these networks to generate species-specific social strategies such as monogamous social attachments and social gregarity.

    “OXTR is often enriched within regions of crucial behavioral circuits such as the mesolimbic reward (MLR) network and social decision making network and appears to modulate these networks to generate species-specific social strategies such as monogamous social attachments (32) and social gregarity (7).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [32] Donaldson, 2008, Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality, Science source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] Goodson, 2012, Evolving nonapeptide mechanisms of gregariousness and social diversity in birds, Horm Behav source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Differences in mRNA levels between alleles occur in the same nuclear environment, so environmental, hormonal, or epigenetic factors should affect both alleles equally unless nearby cis-regulatory elements are variable.

    “Any differences in mRNA levels between alleles occur in the same nuclear environment, where both alleles should be affected equally by environmental, hormonal or epigenetic factors, unless cis-REs proximal to the alleles are variable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Allelic imbalance is commonly observed in a tissue-specific manner.

    “Allelic imbalance is commonly observed in a tissue-specific manner (51, 52).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [51] Wilkins, 2007, Extreme context specificity in differential allelic expression, Hum Mol Genet source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [52] Li, 2009, Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform, Bioinformatics source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In prairie voles, a microsatellite in the 5' flanking region of Avpr1a containing cis-regulatory elements has functional influence over species differences and individual variation in Avpr1a expression and is associated with variation in social behavior.

    “In prairie voles, a microsatellite in the 5’ flanking region of the vasopressin receptor gene (Avpr1a) containing cis-REs has been shown to have functional influence over species differences and individual variation in Avpr1a expression and is associated with variation in social behavior (47, 48).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [47] Donaldson, 2013, The relative contribution of proximal 5′ flanking sequence and microsatellite variation on brain vasopressin 1a receptor (Avpr1a) gene expression and behavior, PLoS Genet source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [48] Johnson, 2005, Polymorphisms affecting gene regulation and mRNA processing: Broad implications for pharmacogenetics, Pharmacol Ther source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Variation in gene expression mediated by cis-regulatory elements plays an important role in evolutionary phenotypic change.

    “Variation in gene expression mediated by cis-REs plays an important role in evolutionary phenotypic change (32, 42–46).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [32] Donaldson, 2008, Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality, Science source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [42] Bendesky, 2011, Genetic contributions to behavioural diversity at the gene-environment interface, Nat Rev Genet source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [43] Linnen, 2013, Adaptive evolution of multiple traits through multiple mutations at a single gene, Science source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [44] Oleksiak, 2002, Variation in gene expression within and among natural populations, Nat Genet source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [45] Cretekos, 2008, Regulatory divergence modifies limb length between mammals, Genes Dev source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [46] Hammock, 2005, Microsatellite instability generates diversity in brain and sociobehavioral traits, Science source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Comparisons of about 1500 bp of 5' flanking regions from the Oxtr gene reveal only a few SNPs and 99% homology between prairie and montane voles.

    “Comparisons of ~1500 bp of 5’ flanking regions from the Oxtr gene reveal only a few SNPs and 99% homology between the species (63).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63] Young, 1997, The 5′ flanking region of the monogamous prairie vole oxytocin receptor gene directs tissue-specific expression in transgenic mice, Ann N Y Acad Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Sequencing variants were filtered to have read depth no lower than 100 reads and quality score at least 1000.

    “Amongst the 45 voles we sequenced, we identified 967 SNPs with a read depth no lower than 100 reads, a quality score of at least 1000, and for which all were variable in our sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Transgenic mice carrying a reporter gene driven by 5 kb of prairie vole Oxtr 5' flanking sequence express the reporter in a brain pattern resembling prairie voles, suggesting the sequence may suffice for some aspects of brain-region-specific expression.

    “Transgenic mice carrying a reporter gene driven by 5 kb of the prairie vole Oxtr 5’ flanking sequence express the reporter in the brain in a pattern resembling prairie voles (64), suggesting the sequence may suffice for some aspects of brain region-specific expression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64] Harony-Nicolas, 2014, Brain region-specific methylation in the promoter of the murine oxytocin receptor gene is involved in its expression regulation, Psychoneuroendocrinology source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Polymorphic cis-regulatory elements have been shown to affect CTCF binding and DNA looping.

    “Polymorphic cis-REs have been shown to influence CTCF binding (71, 72) and DNA looping (73).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [71] Paredes, 2013, Allele-specific transcriptional activity of the variable number of tandem repeats in 5′ region of the DRD4 gene is stimulus specific in human neuronal cells, Genes Brain Behav source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [72] Visser, 2015, Allele-specific transcriptional regulation of IRF4 in melanocytes is mediated by chromatin looping of the intronic rs12203592 enhancer to the IRF4 promoter, Hum Mol Genet source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [73] Dekker, 2013, Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: Interpreting chromatin interaction data, Nat Rev Genet source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The human OXTR intron accumulates rare SNPs in ASD cases.

    “and accumulates rare SNPs in cases of ASD (62).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] Young, 1996, Species differences in central oxytocin receptor gene expression: Comparative analysis of promoter sequences, J Neuroendocrinol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    CTCF acts as a spatial organizer, helping DNA loop so cis-regulatory elements can interact with promoters for gene transcription.

    “One role of CTCF is to act as a spatial organizer, aiding DNA looping to permit cis-RE-promoter interactions required for gene transcription (60).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [60] Mizumoto, 1997, A genomic element within the third intron of the human oxytocin receptor gene may be involved in transcriptional suppression, Mol Cell Endocrinol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Together these data suggest NT213739 is strongly associated with transcriptional variation of Oxtr and tightly linked to a cis-regulatory element.

    “Together these data suggest that NT213739 is strongly associated with transcriptional variation of the Oxtr gene and tightly linked to a cis-RE.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    DNA methylation of OXTR in humans may be mediated by an intronic SNP.

    “Interestingly, DNA methylation of OXTR in humans may be mediated by an intronic SNP (67).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [67] Insel, 1993, Gonadal steroids have paradoxical effects on brain oxytocin receptors, J Neuroendocrinol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    cis-regulatory elements appear to contribute exquisite control over OXTR and through this process influence behavioral diversity in prairie voles.

    “In this manner cis-REs appear to contribute exquisite control over OXTR and through this process, influence behavioral diversity in prairie voles.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Prairie voles show strong OXTR expression in MLR regions, a conserved reward-processing network implicated in depression, addiction, and schizophrenia.

    “Prairie voles strongly express OXTR in regions of the MLR, a conserved neural network (75) involved in reward processing and implicated in numerous human psychiatric disorders including depression (76), addiction (77), and schizophrenia (78).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [75] Russo, 2013, The brain reward circuitry in mood disorders, Nat Rev Neurosci source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [76] Luscher, 2011, Drug-evoked synaptic plasticity in addiction: From molecular changes to circuit remodeling, Neuron source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [77] Abi-Dargham, 2014, Schizophrenia: Overview and dopamine dysfunction, J Clin Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The human OXTR intron may contain additional cis-regulatory elements.

    “Additionally, the human intron may contain other cis-REs (61)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [61] Liu, 2015, Novel rare variations of the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene in autism spectrum disorder individuals, Human Genome Variation source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Genetic variation in Oxtr exerts robust control over individual diversity in Oxtr expression and OXTR density in the prairie vole brain, and this influence is region-specific.

    “We here demonstrate that genetic variation in the Oxtr exerts robust control over individual diversity in Oxtr expression and OXTR density in the prairie vole brain and that this influence on expression occurs in a region-specific manner.”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
      “Taken together, these findings provide convincing evidence for robust genetic influence on Oxtr expression”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    DNA-binding sites for transcription factors can vary across species.

    “We note that such comparisons should be made with the understanding that transcription factor binding sites may differ between species (70).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] Verlaan, 2009, Allele-specific chromatin remodeling in the ZPBP2/GSDMB/ORMDL3 locus associated with the risk of asthma and autoimmune disease, Am J Hum Genet source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Within the third intron of human OXTR, a CTCF peak is close to SNP rs237887, predicted to lie near a cis-regulatory element and linked to face recognition and ASD diagnosis.

    “In the human OXTR third intron, the CTCF peak is found near a SNP, rs237887, that was predicted to be near a cis-RE, and associated with face recognition abilities (20) and ASD diagnosis (21).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [20] Skuse, 2014, Common polymorphism in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with human social recognition skills, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [21] LoParo, 2015, The oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis, Mol Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Testosterone increases OXTR in the hypothalamus of rats but decreases OXTR in mice.

    “For example, testosterone increases OXTR in the hypothalamus of rats but decreases OXTR in mice (68, 69).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [68] Bale, 1995, Regulation of oxytocin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in the ventromedial hypothalamus by testosterone and its metabolites, Endocrinology source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [69] Odom, 2007, Tissue-specific transcriptional regulation has diverged significantly between human and mouse, Nat Genet source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Factor extraction decisions were based on the eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule, parallel analysis, the optimal coordinates method, and the acceleration factor.

    “Regarding the factor analyses, to determine how many factors to extract we used the “nFactors” package in R and the factor extraction decisions were based on the eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule, parallel analysis, the optimal coordinates method and acceleration factor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    DNA methylation of Oxtr differs between brain regions in rodents.

    “DNA methylation of Oxtr differs between brain regions in rodents (65, 66).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [65] Beery, 2016, Natural variation in maternal care and cross-tissue patterns of oxytocin receptor gene methylation in rats, Horm Behav source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [66] Reiner, 2015, Methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene in clinically depressed patients compared to controls: The role of OXTR rs53576 genotype, J Psychiatr Res source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Associations between genetic information and brain data were examined using linear regression with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons.

    “Associations between genetic information and brain data were examined using linear regression with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Other studies report links between OXTR and ASD endophenotypes, such as structural differences in social-cognition brain regions.

    “and others have reported associations with endophenotypes of ASD (20, 82, 83), including structural variability in brain regions relevant to social cognition (80, 84).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [20] Skuse, 2014, Common polymorphism in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with human social recognition skills, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [82] Lerer, 2008, Association between the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene and autism: Relationship to Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales and cognition, Mol Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [83] Inoue, 2010, Association between the oxytocin receptor gene and amygdalar volume in healthy adults, Biol Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

36 of 36
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The neural mechanisms by which non-coding SNPs in OXTR influence behavior have not yet been explored.

    “Despite these many associations with human social behavior and disorders, the neural mechanisms by which non-coding SNPs in the OXTR could influence behaviors has yet to be explored.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Correlations between OXTR densities across brain regions can be explained by unobserved latent variables, possibly reflecting transcriptional processes.

    “We hypothesize that correlations between OXTR densities from different brain regions can be explained by unobserved variables, possibly reflecting transcriptional processes giving rise to the patterns of correlation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mouse ENCODE signatures of transcriptional activity in the Oxtr region indicate homologous cis-regulatory elements in prairie vole.

    “we investigated their homology with regions of the mouse Oxtr gene that overlap with signatures of functional activity occurring within neural tissues where OXTR is expressed in the mouse (59).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Candidate gene polymorphisms usually explain only 1–10% of behavioral phenotype variance in behavioral genetic studies.

    “Behavioral genetic studies typically report that 1–10% of the variance in behavioral phenotype is explained by candidate gene polymorphisms.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    OXTR density lies closer to genotype than behavior does in biological terms.

    “We presume that OXTR density is biologically more proximate to genotype than behavior”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Behavioral genetic studies usually involve many additional contributors to behavioral variation.

    “and in typical behavioral genetic studies many more variables are contributing to behavioral variation.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, L. B., Walum, H., Inoue, K., Eyrich, N. W., & Young, L. J.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Young, Larry J.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
80
Issue
2
Pages
160-169
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2216755319
Cited by
191
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 2
FWCI
32.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01MH096983, 1P50MH100023, 5T32GM008605, 5T32DA015040)
  • National Institutes of Health Office of Research Infrastructure Programs/OD (P51OD11132)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
oxytocin receptor gene, oxytocin receptor, Microtus ochrogaster, social attachment, brain region-specific gene expression, allelic imbalance, cis-regulatory elements, intronic polymorphism, nucleus accumbens, striatum, mate preferences, monogamy, genetic regulation of gene expression, autism spectrum disorder
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Alleles, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Arvicolinae, Individuality, Nucleus Accumbens, Object Attachment, Polymorphism, Genetic, RNA, Messenger, Social Behavior, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Receptors, Oxytocin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review