The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1,218 of the 1,218 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure and dynamics of molecular networks: A novel paradigm of drug discovery
Open accessAbstract
Despite considerable progress in genome- and proteome-based high-throughput screening methods and in rational drug design, the increase in approved drugs in the past decade did not match the increase of drug development costs. Network description and analysis not only gives a systems-level understanding of drug action and disease complexity, but can also help to improve the efficiency of drug design. We give a comprehensive assessment of the analytical tools of network topology and dynamics. The state-of-the-art use of chemical similarity, protein structure, protein-protein interaction, signaling, genetic interaction and metabolic networks in the discovery of drug targets is summarized. We propose that network targeting follows two basic strategies. The “central hit strategy” selectively targets central node/edges of the flexible networks of infectious agents or cancer cells to kill them. The “network influence strategy” works against other diseases, where an efficient reconfiguration of rigid networks needs to be achieved. It is shown how network techniques can help in the identification of single-target, edgetic, multi-target and allo-network drug target candidates. We review the recent boom in network methods helping hit identification, lead selection optimizing drug efficacy, as well as minimizing side-effects and drug toxicity. Successful network-based drug development strategies are shown through the examples of infections, cancer, metabolic diseases, neurodegenerative diseases and aging. Summarizing >1200 references we suggest an optimized protocol of network-aided drug development, and provide a list of systems-level hallmarks of drug quality. Finally, we highlight network-related drug development trends helping to achieve these hallmarks by a cohesive, global approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation
Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 · Cited by 66,590
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2000) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9 · Cited by 29,219
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11247 · Cited by 18,072
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Repertoires of Autophagy in the Pathogenesis of Ocular Diseases
Li, Y.-J., Jiang, Q., Cao, G.-F., Yao, J., & Yan, B. (2015) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000373980 · Cited by 16,304
Community structure in social and biological networks
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.122653799 · Cited by 15,502
Warburg, O. (1956) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.123.3191.309 · Cited by 13,425
Cited by
Mostafavi, S., Gaiteri, C., Sullivan, S. E., White, C. C., Tasaki, S., Xu, J., Taga, M., Klein, H.-U., Patrick, E., Komashko, V., et al. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0154-9 · Cited by 509
Network‐based Approaches in Pharmacology
Boezio, B., Audouze, K., Ducrot, P., & Taboureau, O. (2017) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201700048 · Cited by 359
Gaiteri, C., Ding, Y., French, B., Tseng, G. C., & Sibille, E. (2014) · Genes, Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1111/gbb.12106 · Cited by 289
Schlotter, F., Halu, A., Goto, S., Blaser, M. C., Body, S. C., Lee, L. H., Higashi, H., DeLaughter, D. M., Hutcheson, J. D., Vyas, P., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.117.032291 · Cited by 256
Agis-Torres, A., Sollhuber, M., Fernandez, M., & Sanchez-Montero, J. M. (2014) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159x113116660047 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Csermely, P., Korcsmáros, T., Kiss, H. J. M., London, G., & Nussinov, R.
- Venue
- Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-408
- ISSN
- 0163-7258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140239055
- Cited by
- 892
- References
- 1,218
- FWCI
- 107.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure and dynamics of molecular networks: A novel paradigm of drug discovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.01.016
- The paper
- Csermely, P., Korcsmáros, T., Kiss, H. J. M., London, G., & Nussinov, R. (2013). Structure and dynamics of molecular networks: A novel paradigm of drug discovery. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.01.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.