The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sustainability issues in laser-based additive manufacturing
Open accessAbstract
Sustainability is a consideration of resource utilization without depletion or adverse environmental impact. In manufacturing, important sustainability issues include energy consumption, waste generation, water usage and the environmental impact of the manufactured part in service. This paper deals with three aspects of sustainability as it applies to additive manufacturing. First is a review of the research needs for energy and sustainability as applied to additive manufacturing based on the 2009 Roadmap for Additive Manufacturing Workshop. The second part is an energy assessment for selective laser sintering (SLS) of polymers. Using polyamide powder in a 3D Systems Vanguard HiQ Sinterstation, energy loss during a build was measured due to the chamber heaters, the roller mechanism, the piston elevators and the laser. This accounted for 95% of the total energy consumption. An overall energy assessment was accomplished using eco-indicators. The last topic is electrochemical deposition of porous SLS non-polymeric preforms. The goal is to reduce energy consumption in SLS of non-polymeric materials. The approach was to mix a transient binder with the material, to create an SLS green part, to convert the binder, and then to remove the open, connected porosity and to densify the part by chemical deposition at room temperature within the pore network. The model system was silicon carbide powder mixed with a phenolic transient binder coupled with electrolytic deposition of nickel. Deposition was facilitated by inserting a conductive graphite cathode in the part center to draw the positive nickel ions through the interconnected porous network and to deposit them on the pore walls. The Roadmap for Additive Manufacturing Workshop was sponsored by the National Science Foundation under Grant CMMI-0906212 and by the Office of Naval Research under Grant N00014-09-1-0558. The electrolytic deposition research was sponsored by the National Science Foundation, Grant CMMI-0926316.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges
Ford, S., & Despeisse, M. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150 · Cited by 1,889
Fatigue performance evaluation of selective laser melted Ti–6Al–4V
Edwards, P., & Ramulu, M. (2014) · Materials Science and Engineering: A · doi:10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.041 · Cited by 874
Bonilla, S. H., Silva, H. R. O., Terra da Silva, M., Franco Gonçalves, R., & Sacomano, J. B. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10103740 · Cited by 645
Additive manufacturing of steels: a review of achievements and challenges
Haghdadi, N., Laleh, M., Moyle, M., & Primig, S. (2021) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-020-05109-0 · Cited by 622
Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability
Oláh, J., Aburumman, N., Popp, J., Khan, M. A., Haddad, H., & Kitukutha, N. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12114674 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Sreenivasan, R., Goel, A., & Bourell, D. L.
- Venue
- Physics Procedia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 81-90
- ISSN
- 1875-3892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087375921
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainability issues in laser-based additive manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.124
- The paper
- Sreenivasan, R., Goel, A., & Bourell, D. L. (2010). Sustainability issues in laser-based additive manufacturing. Physics Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.124
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.