Cited by 664Digital Transformation in IndustryImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietySustainable Supply Chain Management

Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Implications: A Scenario-Based Analysis of the Impacts and Challenges

Open access
Bonilla, Silvia H., Silva, Helton R. O., Terra da Silva, Marcia, Franco Gonçalves, Rodrigo, Sacomano, José B.·2018·Sustainability

Abstract

The new evolution of the production and industrial process called Industry 4.0, and its related technologies such as the Internet of Things, big data analytics, and cyber–physical systems, among others, still have an unknown potential impact on sustainability and the environment. In this paper, we conduct a literature-based analysis to discuss the sustainability impact and challenges of Industry 4.0 from four different scenarios: deployment, operation and technologies, integration and compliance with the sustainable development goals, and long-run scenarios. From these scenarios, our analysis resulted in positive or negative impacts related to the basic production inputs and outputs flows: raw material, energy and information consumption and product and waste disposal. As the main results, we identified both positive and negative expected impacts, with some predominance of positives that can be considered positive secondary effects derived from Industry 4.0 activities. However, only through integrating Industry 4.0 with the sustainable development goals in an eco-innovation platform, can it really ensure environmental performance. It is expected that this work can contribute to helping stakeholders, practitioners and governments to advance solutions to deal with the outcomes emerging through the massive adoption of those technologies, as well as supporting the expected positive impacts through policies and financial initiatives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su10103740

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ultimate distribution of the gas can influence the design and procurement of gasification and gas upgrading systems and the demands and challenges of gas analysis in the measurement facility.

    “The ultimate distribution of the gas can influence not only the design and procurement of the most appropriate gasification and gas upgrading systems, but it will also influence the demands and challenges of gas analysis in the measurement facility [65].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Odum, H. Environmental Accouting; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  2. Brown, M.T., Sweeney, S., Campbell, D.E., Huang, S., Rydberg, T., Ulgiati, S., Eds.; University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2015; pp. 105-110. ISBN 978-0-9707325-9-0.
  3. International Federation of Robotics (IFR). World Robotics Report 2016. In Proceedings of the International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt, Germany, 29 September 2016.
  4. Gabriel, M.; Pessl, E. Industry 4.0 and sustainability impacts: Critical discussion of sustainability aspects with a special focus on future of work and ecological consequences. Ann. Fac. Eng. Hunedoara Int. J. Eng. 2016, 14, 131-136.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonilla, S. H., Silva, H. R. O., Terra da Silva, M., Franco Gonçalves, R., & Sacomano, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Paulista (BR)
  • Post Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University, UNIP, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil
Corresponding author
Bonilla, Silvia H.
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-10-17
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
3740
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897985668
Cited by
645
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 2
FWCI
51.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (1675677)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
Industry 4.0, sustainability impacts, Sustainable Development Goals, Internet of Things, big data analytics, cyber-physical systems, environmental performance, energy consumption, waste disposal, raw material consumption, information consumption, scenario analysis, technology adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review