Cited by 133Laser Material Processing TechniquesLaser-Ablation Synthesis of NanoparticlesAdvanced Machining and Optimization Techniques

Influence of the pulse duration in the ps-regime on the ablation efficiency of metals

Open access
Jaeggi, B., Neuenschwander, B., Schmid, M., Muralt, M., Zuercher, J., Hunziker, U.·2011·Physics Procedia

Abstract

Ablation characteristics of copper and stainless steel with laser pulses from 10 to 100 ps at 1064 nm wavelength were studied. The influence of the pulse duration and the number of pulses on the threshold fluence and the penetration depth has been investigated. The results show a strong decrease of the ablation efficiency and quality with increasing pulse duration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.118

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The penetration depth decreases in the ablation of copper and steel in air when increasing the pulse duration from 10 ps to 50 ps.

    “As demonstrated by Jaeggi et al. [103], the threshold fluence for ablation increases and the penetration depth decreases in the ablation of copper and steel in air when increasing the pulse duration from 10 ps to 50 ps.”
  • The threshold fluence for ablation increases in the ablation of copper and steel in air when increasing the pulse duration from 10 ps to 50 ps.

    “As demonstrated by Jaeggi et al. [103], the threshold fluence for ablation increases and the penetration depth decreases in the ablation of copper and steel in air when increasing the pulse duration from 10 ps to 50 ps.”
  • A flowing liquid homogenizes the result of LAL compared to a static fluid environment.

    “A flowing liquid homogenizes the result of LAL compared to a static fluid environment [102,103].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaeggi, B., Neuenschwander, B., Schmid, M., Muralt, M., Zuercher, J., & Hunziker, U.
Affiliations
Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH)
Corresponding author
Jaeggi, B.
Venue
Physics Procedia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011
Volume
12
Pages
164-171
ISSN
1875-3892 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015596333
Cited by
133
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physics Procedia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ARBOR - Bern University of Applied Sciences Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • BFH: ARBOR
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Laser Material Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
Keywords
laser ablation, pulse duration, ablation efficiency, copper, stainless steel, threshold fluence, penetration depth, picosecond pulses, 1064 nm, pulse number

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review