Sex-specific maladaptive responses to acute stress upon in utero THC exposure are mediated by dopamine
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Cannabis remains by far the most consumed illicit drug in Europe. The availability of more potent cannabis has raised concerns regarding the enhanced health risks associated with its use, particularly among pregnant women. Growing evidence shows that cannabis use during pregnancy increases the risks of child psychopathology. We have previously shown that male rat offspring prenatally exposed to Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a rat model of prenatal cannabinoid exposure (PCE), display a hyperdopaminergic phenotype associated with a differential susceptibility to acute THC- and stress-mediated effects on sensorimotor gating functions. Here, we explore the contribution of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, key regulator of body adaptive stress responses, to the detrimental effects of acute stress on ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine neurons and sensorimotor gating function of PCE rats. We report a sex-dependent compromised balance in mRNA levels of genes encoding mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors in the VTA, alongside with stress-induced pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) deficits. Notably, VTA dopamine neuronal activity is required for the manifestation of stress-dependent deterioration of PPI. Finally, pharmacological manipulations targeting glycogen-synthase-kinase-3-β signaling during postnatal development correct these stress-induced, sex-specific and dopamine-dependent deficits of PPI. Collectively, these results highlight the critical sex-dependent interplay between HPA axis and dopamine system in the regulation of sensorimotor gating functions in rats.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Colizzi, M., Lasalvia, A., & Ruggeri, M. (2020) · International Journal of Mental Health Systems · doi:10.1186/s13033-020-00356-9 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
Pruessner, J. C., Champagne, F., Meaney, M. J., & Dagher, A. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3422-03.2004 · Cited by 709 · see citing works
Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Ambler, A., Danese, A., Elliott, M. L., Hariri, A., Harrington, H., Hogan, S., Poulton, R., Ramrakha, S., et al. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3221 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
The effects of psychosocial stress on dopaminergic function and the acute stress response
Bloomfield, M. A., McCutcheon, R. A., Kempton, M., Freeman, T. P., & Howes, O. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.46797 · Cited by 112 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Adaptive responses to stress can be modified by experience, which can increase the sensitivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and dopamine system and produce inadequate stress reactions [8,9].”
InfluentialSolomon, M. B., Loftspring, M., de Kloet, A. D., Ghosal, S., Jankord, R., Flak, J. N., Wulsin, A. C., Krause, E. G., Zhang, R., Rice, T., et al. (2015) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2015-1276 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Valeria, S., Francesco, T., Sonia, A., Laura, V. P., Luca, C., Marcello, S., Roberta, L., Patrizia, P., Arnau, B. G., Roberto, F., & Miriam, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Venue
- Pharmacological Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-12
- Volume
- 210
- Pages
- 107536
- ISSN
- 1043-6618 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7617568
- OpenAlex
- W4404876462
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2025-08-01)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Pharmacological Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (101088207)
- Department of Health (SGR 00022)
- H2020 Excellent Science
- European Research Council (948217)
- HORIZON EUROPE Excellent Science
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- prenatal cannabinoid exposure, tetrahydrocannabinol, acute stress, sensorimotor gating, prepulse inhibition, ventral tegmental area, dopaminergic neurons, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, mineralocorticoid receptor, glucocorticoid receptor, sex differences, glycogen synthase kinase-3β, cannabis use during pregnancy, offspring psychopathology
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dopamine, Female, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Male, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Receptors, Glucocorticoid, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Psychological, Dronabinol, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Ventral Tegmental Area, Rats, Dopaminergic Neurons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review