CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 297Complex Systems and Time Series AnalysisStatistical Mechanics and EntropyTheoretical and Computational Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pareto law in a kinetic model of market with random saving propensity

Open access
Chatterjee, Arnab, K. Chakrabarti, Bikas, Manna, S.S·2004·Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2003.11.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physa.2003.11.014

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Fujiwara, 2003, Physica A, 321, 598, 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01663-1 · DOI
  2. Levy, 1997, Physica A, 242, 90, 10.1016/S0378-4371(97)00217-3 · DOI
  3. Chakrabarti, 1995, Ind. J. Phys. B, 69, 681
  4. Dragulescu, 2001, Physica A, 299, 213, 10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00298-9 · DOI · Paper page
  5. A.A. Dragulescu, V.M. Yakovenko, in: P.L. Garrido, J. Marro (Eds.), Modeling of Complex Systems: Seventh Granada Lectures, AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 661, New York, 2003, pp. 180–183 (http://www.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/0211175 and http://proceedings.aip.org/proceedings/confproceed/661.jsp).
  6. Chakraborti, 2000, Eur. Phys. J. B, 17, 167, 10.1007/s100510070173 · DOI
  7. S. Ispolatov, P.L. Krapivsky, S. Redner, Eur. Phys. J. B 2 (1998) 267; · DOI
  8. J.C. Ferrero, cond-mat/0306322 (2003); · arXiv
  9. F. Slanina, cond-mat/0311235 (2003). · DOI
  10. Chakraborti, 2002, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, 13, 1315, 10.1142/S0129183102003905 · DOI
  11. Hayes, 2002, Am. Sci., 90, 400, 10.1511/2002.33.3291 · DOI
  12. Chakraborti, 2001, Physica A, 297, 253, 10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00195-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chatterjee, A., K. Chakrabarti, B., & Manna, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (IN)
  • S.N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Chatterjee, Arnab
ORCID
Venue
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
335
Issue
1-2
Pages
155-163
ISSN
0378-4371 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.physa.2003.11.014
OpenAlex
W2057997747
Cited by
297
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
30.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
Pareto distribution, saving propensity, self-organized criticality, money distribution, quenched randomness, Boltzmann distribution, binary collisions, wealth inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review