Cited by 233Birth, Development, and HealthRegulation of Appetite and ObesityPancreatic function and diabetes

Perinatal Programming and Functional Teratogenesis: Impact on Body Weight Regulation and Obesity

PLAGEMANN, A·2005·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

It is increasingly accepted that alterations of the intrauterine and early postnatal nutritional, metabolic, and hormonal environment may cause predispositions for the development of diseases in later life. Studies in the offspring of diabetic mothers have decisively contributed to this perception. Alterations of the fetal and neonatal environment which offspring of diabetic mothers 'experience' seem to program a disposition to develop obesity, diabetes mellitus and Syndrome X-like alterations throughout later life. Underweight at birth is also suggested to lead to an increased risk of Syndrome X in later life ('Barker hypothesis'). Pathophysiological mechanisms are unclear. Hormones are important environment-dependent organizers of the developing neuro-endocrine-immune network, which finally regulates all fundamental processes of life. When present in non-physiological concentrations during 'critical periods' of perinatal life, induced by alterations in the intrauterine or neonatal environment, hormones can act as 'endogenous functional teratogens'. Perinatal hyperinsulinism is pathognomonic in the offspring of diabetic mothers. Early hyperinsulinism also occurs as a result of early postnatal overfeeding. In rats, endogenous hyperinsulinism, as well as peripheral or only intrahypothalamic insulin treatment during perinatal development, may lead to 'malprogramming' of neuroendocrine systems regulating body weight, food intake and metabolism. This results in an increased disposition to become obese and to develop diabetes throughout life. In conclusion, a complex malprogramming of the central regulation of body weight and metabolism may provide a general etiopathogenetic concept, explaining perinatally acquired dispositions, thereby opening a wide field of primary prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.065

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PLAGEMANN, A.
Affiliations
Stiftung Charité (DE)
Corresponding author
PLAGEMANN, A
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12-15
Volume
86
Issue
5
Pages
661-668
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006219359
Cited by
233
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
13.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
perinatal programming, hyperinsulinism, maternal diabetes, offspring of diabetic mothers, Barker hypothesis, obesity, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, neuroendocrine-immune network, body weight regulation, dietary intake, metabolic programming, primary prevention
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Eating, Female, Growth, Hormones, Humans, Hypothalamus, Infant, Newborn, Insulin, Obesity, Pregnancy, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review