Cited by 275Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorEating Disorders and Behaviors

Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity

Open access
Berthoud, Hans-Rudolf, Lenard, Natalie R., Shin, Andrew C.·2011·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Abstract

Given the unabated obesity problem, there is increasing appreciation of expressions like “my eyes are bigger than my stomach,” and recent studies in rodents and humans suggest that dysregulated brain reward pathways may be contributing not only to drug addiction but also to increased intake of palatable foods and ultimately obesity. After describing recent progress in revealing the neural pathways and mechanisms underlying food reward and the attribution of incentive salience by internal state signals, we analyze the potentially circular relationship between palatable food intake, hyperphagia, and obesity. Are there preexisting individual differences in reward functions at an early age, and could they be responsible for development of obesity later in life? Does repeated exposure to palatable foods set off a cascade of sensitization as in drug and alcohol addiction? Are reward functions altered by secondary effects of the obese state, such as increased signaling through inflammatory, oxidative, and mitochondrial stress pathways? Answering these questions will significantly impact prevention and treatment of obesity and its ensuing comorbidities as well as eating disorders and drug and alcohol addiction.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that food reward (“liking,” “wanting,” and learning) interacts with homeostatic metabolic signals and may contribute to hyperphagia and obesity through preexisting reward differences, addiction-like neuroadaptation to palatable foods, and secondary effects of the obese state. It concludes that evidence remains largely indirect/correlative, with mesolimbic dopamine implicated in “wanting” but still unclear whether over- or under-activity drives hyperphagia.

Key findings

  • Food reward is a composite of “liking” (hedonic impact), “wanting” (incentive salience), and learning, with separable brain systems: μ-opioid-mediated “liking” hotspots in nucleus accumbens shell/ventral pallidum, and mesolimbic dopamine for “wanting”; leptin, ghrelin, and insulin modulate these processes.
  • Three non-exclusive mechanisms may link reward to obesity: preexisting differences in reward function, repeated palatable-food intake as an escalating addictive process, and obesity-induced changes in reward circuitry; among ~20 major obesity genes, none are directly implicated in reward, and combined effects account for less than ∼5% of human obesity.
  • In Wistar rats, a palatable cafeteria diet produced sustained hyperphagia over 40 days and increased lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation threshold in parallel with weight gain; after 14 days of abstinence, reward threshold did not normalize despite hypophagia and ∼10% body weight loss, unlike the relatively rapid ∼48 h normalization seen after cocaine abstinence.
  • Obesity/high-fat diet can alter reward: obesity-prone rats on chow or high-fat diet without extra weight gain showed reduced progressive ratio break point for sucrose, amphetamine-induced conditioned place preference, and nucleus accumbens dopamine turnover; leptin-deficient humans showed exaggerated nucleus accumbens activation to food images that was abolished by leptin.

Methods

  • Narrative review, not a primary empirical study; it synthesizes rodent, nonhuman primate, and human literature on food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity.
  • Data/sample: cited animal models (rats, mice, primates) and human neuroimaging/clinical studies; no new sample or original dataset.
  • Main analysis: conceptual synthesis of neural pathways and three hypothesized reward–obesity mechanisms; no meta-analysis or statistical pooling.

Limitations

  • The paper states there is “no smoking gun” for a single specific neural pathway or molecule, and it is not yet clear whether over- or under-activity of dopamine signaling is at the origin of hyperphagia or which mesolimbic dopamine projections are specifically involved.
  • The paper notes that few studies dissociate preexisting reward differences from secondary effects of the obese state, and that only longitudinal studies in genetically defined populations will provide more conclusive answers; controlled human studies showing long-term effects of palatability on energy balance are few.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, conclusions rely heavily on indirect and correlative evidence from heterogeneous animal models and methodologies, without systematic review or meta-analytic quantification.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpregu.00028.2011

Cites

208 of 208 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 153 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    Nutrient sensors in the gastrointestinal tract and elsewhere in the body contribute to the generation of food reward during and after a meal.

    “nutrient sensors in the gastrointestinal tract and elsewhere in the body appear to also contribute to the generation of food reward during and after a meal ([153](#B153)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [153] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    In the preparatory phase, before any oral contact is made with food, reward expectancy plays a pivotal role.

    “In the preparatory phase, before any oral contact is made with food, reward expectancy plays a pivotal role.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning

    These reward-related neural systems likely evolved to engage powerful motivations and drives for guaranteed supply and ingestion of beneficial foods from a sparse and often hostile environment.

    “By forming representations and reward expectancies through processes of learning and memory, these systems likely evolved to engage powerful motivations and drives for guaranteed supply with and ingestion of beneficial foods from a sparse and often hostile environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    The current obesity epidemic is best explained as a mismatch between the modern environment/lifestyle and biological response patterns that evolved in a scarce environment.

    “the current obesity epidemic is best explained as a mismatch between the modern environment/lifestyle and biological response patterns that evolved in a scarce environment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [130] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [169] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    Reward expectancy appears to be the main driver to keep focused during the procurement phase.

    “Reward expectancy appears to be the main driver to keep focused during this journey.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 44
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 8
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Strong attraction to food and food cues, slow satiety mechanisms, and high metabolic efficiency were advantageous for survival in a scarce environment.

    “Biological traits like strong attraction to food and food cues, slow satiety mechanisms, and high metabolic efficiency, advantageous for survival in a scarce environment, seem now to be our worst enemies when it comes to resisting an abundance of food”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [130] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [169] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Ingestive behavior consists of preparatory, consummatory, and postconsummatory phases.

    “Ingestive behavior is not limited to the act of eating, but consists of preparatory, consummatory, and postconsummatory phases”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    During eating, immediate, direct pleasure is derived mainly from gustatory and olfactory sensations, driving consumption throughout the meal until satiation signals dominate.

    “During eating, immediate, direct pleasure is derived from mainly gustatory and olfactory sensations, driving consumption throughout the meal until satiation signals dominate ([166](#B166)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [166] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Food intake and energy expenditure are controlled by complex, redundant, and distributed neural systems, likely involving thousands of genes and reflecting the fundamental biological importance of adequate nutrient supply and energy balance.

    “Food intake and energy expenditure are thought to be controlled by complex, redundant, and distributed neural systems, likely involving thousands of genes and reflecting the fundamental biological importance of adequate nutrient supply and energy balance”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [15] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [103] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Strong attraction to food and food cues, slow satiety mechanisms, and high metabolic efficiency now make it difficult to resist an abundance of food.

    “Biological traits like strong attraction to food and food cues, slow satiety mechanisms, and high metabolic efficiency, advantageous for survival in a scarce environment, seem now to be our worst enemies when it comes to resisting an abundance of food”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [130] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [169] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Neural systems activated by thinking about a favorite dish, savoring a candy in the mouth, or leaning back after a satiating meal are likely very different, although they may contain common elements.

    “Neural systems activated by thinking about a favorite dish, savoring a candy in the mouth, or leaning back after a satiating meal, are likely very different, although they may contain common elements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    A variety of sensory stimuli and emotional states or feelings with vastly different temporal profiles make up the rewarding experience of eating.

    “Thus, a variety of sensory stimuli and emotional states or feelings with vastly different temporal profiles make up the rewarding experience of eating, and the underlying neural functions are only beginning to be understood.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Even in Drosophila, taste-specific receptor cells do not directly synapse on motor neurons responsible for the taste-guided behavioral output, leaving opportunities for modulatory influences from other areas of the nervous system.

    “Even in *Drosophila*, the taste-specific receptor cells do not directly synapse on motor neurons responsible for the taste-guided behavioral output ([68](#B68)), leaving plenty of opportunities for modulatory influences from other areas of the nervous system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [68] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In fruit fly, stimulation of gustatory neurons with sugar activated, while bitter inhibited, a pair of motor neurons in the subesophageal ganglion, leading to either vigorous ingestion or rejection.

    “Even in the fruit fly with its primitive nervous system, stimulation of gustatory neurons with sugar activated, while stimulation with a bitter substance inhibited, a pair of motor neurons in the subesophageal ganglion, leading to either vigorous ingestion or rejection ([68](#B68))”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [68] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The basic brainstem circuitry appears to be able to recognize the usefulness and perhaps pleasantness of a taste stimulus and initiate appropriate behavioral responses.

    “Thus, this basic brainstem circuitry appears to be able to recognize the usefulness and perhaps pleasantness of a taste stimulus and initiate appropriate behavioral responses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In mice with transgenic expression of the receptor for an ordinarily tasteless ligand in either sweet or bitter taste receptor cells, stimulation with the ligand produced either strong attraction or avoidance of sweet solutions, respectively.

    “In mice with transgenic expression of the receptor for an ordinarily tasteless ligand in either sweet or bitter taste receptor cells, stimulation with the ligand produced either strong attraction or avoidance of sweet solutions, respectively ([197](#B197)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [197] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The nucleus accumbens shell is part of a neural loop including the lateral hypothalamus and the ventral tegmental area, with orexin neurons playing a key role.

    “The nucleus accumbens shell is thereby part of a neural loop including the lateral hypothalamus and the ventral tegmental area, with orexin neurons playing a key role ([7](#B7), [22](#B22), [77](#B77), [98](#B98), [115](#B115), [125](#B125), [175](#B175), [199](#B199)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [7] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [77] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The most important processing step in the translation of sensory representations into actions is the attribution of what Berridge calls "incentive salience".

    “Perhaps the most important processing step in the translation of such sensory representations into actions is the attribution of what Berridge calls “incentive salience.””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The mechanism of incentive salience allows a starving animal to know it needs calories or a salt-depleted organism to know it needs salt.

    “This mechanism allows a starving animal to know it needs calories or a salt-depleted organism to know it needs salt.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Leptin receptors are located in hypothalamic areas beyond the arcuate nucleus, including the ventromedial, dorsomedial, premammillary, lateral, and perifornical areas, where they likely contribute to leptin's effects on food intake and energy expenditure.

    “But clearly, leptin receptors are located in other hypothalamic areas such as the ventromedial, dorsomedial, and premammillary nuclei, as well as the lateral and perifornical areas where they likely contribute to leptin's effects on food intake and energy expenditure”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [101] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [102] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Subjective pleasantness in humans is coded by neural activity in the medial orbitofrontal cortex as measured by fMRI and is subject to sensory-specific satiety.

    “Similarly, subjective pleasantness in humans was coded by neural activity in the medial orbitofrontal cortex as measured by functional MRI (fMRI) and was subject to sensory-specific satiety, a form of reinforcer devaluation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [45] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [100] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [117] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Leptin injections into the VTA decreased dopamine neuron activity and acutely suppressed food intake, while adenoviral knockdown of leptin receptors specifically in the VTA resulted in increased sucrose preference and sustained palatable food intake.

    “other studies demonstrated that such leptin injections decreased dopamine neuron activity and acutely suppressed food intake, while adenoviral knockdown of leptin receptors specifically in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) resulted in increased sucrose preference and sustained palatable food intake ([84](#B84))”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [84] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In normal rats, leptin promotes tyrosine hydroxylase activity and amphetamine-mediated dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens.

    “Also, in normal rats, leptin promotes tyrosine hydroxylase activity and amphetamine-mediated dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [119] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [124] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Orexin neurons project widely within both forebrain and hindbrain, including a hypothalamic-thalamic-striatal loop and projections to oromotor and autonomic motor areas in the caudal brainstem.

    “In addition to midbrain dopamine neurons, orexin neurons project widely within both forebrain and hindbrain. In particular, a hypothalamic-thalamic-striatal loop involving orexin projections to the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus and cholinergic striatal interneurons ([93](#B93)), and orexin projections to oromotor and autonomic motor areas in the caudal brainstem ([6](#B6)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [93] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Leptin-deficient mice exhibit suppressed rather than increased dopamine neuron activity, and leptin-replacement therapy restored normal dopamine neuron activity as well as amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization.

    “leptin-deficient mice (absence of leptin-receptor signaling) exhibit suppressed rather than increased dopamine neuron activity [as expected from the viral knockdown experiments in rats ([84](#B84))], and leptin-replacement therapy restored normal dopamine neuron activity as well as amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization ([63](#B63))”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [84] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [63] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Ghrelin action directly within the VTA activates dopamine neurons, increases accumbens dopamine turnover, and increases food intake.

    “In contrast, ghrelin action directly within the VTA appears to activate dopamine neurons, increase accumbens dopamine turnover, and increase food intake”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [88] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [116] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Weight loss-induced differences in neural responses to food cues are reversed after leptin treatment, suggesting that low leptin sensitizes brain areas responding to food cues.

    “Both of these weight loss-induced differences were reversed after leptin treatment, suggesting that low leptin sensitizes brain areas responding to food cues.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [142] Rosenbaum M, 2008, J Clin Invest

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus elicits food intake, and rats learn quickly to self-administer such stimulation.

    “It has long been known that electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus elicits food intake and that rats learn quickly to self-administer electrical stimulation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [83] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [183] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Neural activation in the nucleus accumbens elicited by visual food stimuli is very high in genetically leptin-deficient adolescents and promptly returns to normal levels upon leptin administration.

    “Neural activation in the nucleus accumbens elicited by visual food stimuli is very high in genetically leptin-deficient adolescents and promptly returns to normal levels upon leptin administration”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In rodents, absence of leptin increases and addition of leptin dampens peripheral taste and olfactory sensitivity.

    “In rodents, absence of leptin has been shown to increase and addition of leptin to dampen peripheral taste and olfactory sensitivity”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [66] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [90] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [157] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In one study, only about half of male C57/BL6J mice became obese on a palatable high-fat diet, but reward functions were not assessed.

    “In one such study, only about half of male C57/BL6J mice became obese on a palatable high-fat diet ([55](#B55)), but reward functions were not assessed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [55] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Repeated sucrose access can upregulate dopamine release and dopamine transporter, and change dopamine D1 and D2 receptor availability in the nucleus accumbens.

    “The limited information available suggests that repeated sucrose access can upregulate dopamine release ([5](#B5)) and dopamine transporter ([9](#B9)), and change dopamine D1 and D2 receptor availability ([5](#B5), [8](#B8)) in the nucleus accumbens.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [5] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There are many human studies showing acute effects of manipulating palatability, variability, and availability of food, although few controlled studies show long-term effects on energy balance.

    “There are also plenty of human studies showing acute effects of manipulating palatability, variability, and availability of food ([191](#B191), [192](#B192)), although few controlled studies show long-term effects on energy balance ([120](#B120), [134](#B134)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [191] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [192] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [120] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Numerous animal studies demonstrate increased intake of palatable foods and development of diet-induced obesity.

    “This hypothesis is supported by numerous studies in animals demonstrating increased intake of palatable foods and development of obesity, so called diet-induced obesity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [143] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [151] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [152] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mesolimbic dopamine signaling is severely suppressed in leptin-deficient ob/ob mice and rescued by systemic leptin replacement.

    “Mesolimbic dopamine signaling is also severely suppressed in leptin-deficient *ob/ob* mice and rescued by systemic leptin replacement ([63](#B63)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In genetically leptin-deficient humans, neural activity in the nucleus accumbens elicited by viewing pictures of palatable foods was exaggerated in the absence of leptin and abolished after leptin administration.

    “However, in genetically leptin-deficient humans, neural activity in the nucleus accumbens elicited by viewing pictures of palatable foods was exaggerated in the absence of leptin and abolished after leptin administration ([57](#B57)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Preexisting differences in obesity risk could be determined by genetic and epigenetic alterations and by early life experience through developmental programming.

    “Preexisting differences could be determined by genetic and epigenetic alterations, and by early life experience through developmental programming.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is very likely that many important genes for obesity have not yet been discovered, and some of these could operate within the reward system.

    “However, because the combined effect of these genes only accounts for less than ∼5% of human obesity, it is very likely that many important genes have not yet been discovered, some of which could operate within the reward system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The three mechanisms linking food reward and obesity are not mutually exclusive, and it is highly likely that a combination of all three is operative in most individuals.

    “These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, and it is highly likely that a combination of all three is operative in most individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Differences in reward functions between lean and obese subjects could exist before the development of obesity or could be secondary to the obese state.

    “Such differences could exist before the development of obesity or could be secondary to the obese state, but few studies have attempted to dissociate these two mechanisms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    For nonsweet palatable foods (typically high-fat foods), there is less convincing evidence for development of dependence, although intermittent access to corn oil can stimulate dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens.

    “For nonsweet palatable foods (typically high-fat foods), there is less convincing evidence for development of dependence ([21](#B21), [31](#B31)), although intermittent access to corn oil can stimulate dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens ([106](#B106)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [21] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [31] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [106] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Wistar rats, exposure to a palatable cafeteria diet led to sustained hyperphagia over 40 days and lateral hypothalamic electrical self-stimulation threshold increased in parallel to body weight gain.

    “In Wistar rats, exposure to a palatable cafeteria diet led to sustained hyperphagia over 40 days and lateral hypothalamic electrical self-stimulation threshold increased in parallel to body weight gain ([89](#B89)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [89] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The obesity-induced internal toxic environment does not stop at the level of the brain, and within the brain does not stop at the reward circuitry.

    “In summary, it seems clear that the obesity-induced internal toxic environment does not stop at the level of the brain, and within the brain does not stop at the reward circuitry.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is considerable indirect and correlative evidence for involvement of the reward system in causing obesity in both animals and humans, but there is no smoking gun for a single specific neural pathway or molecule.

    “Although there is considerable indirect and correlative evidence for involvement of the reward system in causing obesity in both animals and humans, there is no smoking gun for a single specific neural pathway or molecule.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Abstinence from sucrose can cause craving and withdrawal symptoms, eventually leading to relapse behavior.

    “As with drug ([71](#B71), [96](#B96), [156](#B156)) and alcohol ([18](#B18), [185](#B185)) addiction, abstinence from sucrose can cause craving and withdrawal symptoms ([5](#B5)), eventually leading to relapse behavior ([72](#B72), [73](#B73)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [5] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [72] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [73] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Obesity is associated with dysregulated signaling systems, such as leptin and insulin resistance, as well as increased signaling through proinflammatory cytokines and pathways activated by oxidative and endoplasmatic reticulum stress.

    “Obesity is associated with dysregulated signaling systems, such as leptin and insulin resistance, as well as increased signaling through proinflammatory cytokines and pathways activated by oxidative and endoplasmatic reticulum stress ([3](#B3)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Obesity and hypertriglyceridemia produce cognitive impairment in mice, including reduced lever pressing for food reward.

    “Obesity and hypertriglyceridemia produce cognitive impairment in mice, including reduced lever pressing for food reward ([59](#B59)), and epidemiological studies show an association of body mass index and risk of Parkinson disease and cognitive decline ([85](#B85)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Obesity is a multifactorial disease with a number of potential causes, and the involvement of recent environmental changes including overabundance of palatable food and little opportunity to work off the extra energy seems undeniable.

    “Obesity clearly is a multifactorial disease with a number of potential causes, but the involvement of recent environmental changes including overabundance of palatable food and little opportunity to work off the extra energy seems undeniable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Epidemiological studies show an association of body mass index and risk of Parkinson disease and cognitive decline.

    “Obesity and hypertriglyceridemia produce cognitive impairment in mice, including reduced lever pressing for food reward ([59](#B59)), and epidemiological studies show an association of body mass index and risk of Parkinson disease and cognitive decline ([85](#B85)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [85] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lack of a smoking gun is most likely because the reward system is complex and cannot be easily manipulated with drugs or genetic deletions.

    “This is most likely because the reward system is complex and cannot be easily manipulated with drugs or genetic deletions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The reward system is complex and cannot be easily manipulated with drugs or genetic deletions.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    After 14 days of abstinence from the palatable diet, reward threshold did not normalize even though the rats were hypophagic and lost ∼10% body weight.

    “Interestingly, after 14 days of abstinence from the palatable diet, reward threshold did not normalize even though the rats were hypophagic and lost ∼10% body weight ([89](#B89)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [89] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The end effects of these changes are central insulin and leptin resistance and impaired hypothalamic regulation of energy balance, further favoring the development of obesity and in turn, neurodegeneration.

    “The end effects of these changes are central insulin and leptin resistance and impaired hypothalamic regulation of energy balance, further favoring the development of obesity and in turn, neurodegeneration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Given external conditions and the strong inherent bias of the homeostatic regulatory system to defend against energy depletion more strongly than energy surplus, weight is easily gained but not so easily lost.

    “Given these external conditions together with the strong inherent bias of the homeostatic regulatory system to defend against energy depletion more strongly than energy surplus, weight is easily gained but not so easily lost.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The homeostatic regulatory system has a strong inherent bias to defend against energy depletion more strongly than energy surplus.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Both obesity per se and high-fat diet can cause alterations in mesolimbic dopamine signaling and reward behaviors.

    “These results suggest that both obesity per se and high-fat diet can cause alterations in mesolimbic dopamine signaling and reward behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
49 of 49
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The anatomy, chemistry, and functions of the elaborate neural systems involved in food reward and their interactions with the hypothalamic homeostatic regulator are poorly understood.

    “Regrettably, the anatomy, chemistry, and functions of these elaborate neural systems and their interactions with the homeostatic regulator in the hypothalamus are poorly understood.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Dysregulated brain reward pathways may contribute to increased intake of palatable foods and ultimately obesity.

    “recent studies in rodents and humans suggest that dysregulated brain reward pathways may be contributing not only to drug addiction but also to increased intake of palatable foods and ultimately obesity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Eating is typically experienced as pleasurable and rewarding.

    “Eating is typically experienced as pleasurable and rewarding”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Food is a powerful natural reinforcer that outcompetes most other behaviors, particularly when an individual is metabolically hungry.

    “Thus, food is a powerful natural reinforcer that out competes most other behaviors, particularly when an individual is metabolically hungry.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Metabolic hunger increases motivation to find food and to eat.

    “It has long been known that metabolic hunger increases motivation to find food and to eat, but the neural mechanisms involved were obscure.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The hypothalamus is the epicenter of homeostatic regulation.

    “Given that the hypothalamus was recognized as the epicenter of homeostatic regulation, it was assumed that the metabolic hunger signal originates in this brain area and propagates through neural projections to other areas important for the organization of goal-directed behavior.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no hunger center and no pleasure center in the brain.

    “Just as there is no hunger center, there is no pleasure center in the brain.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In animals, only the subconscious components of pleasure (core “liking”) and aversion are experimentally accessible.

    “In animals, only the subconscious components of pleasure (Berridge's core “liking”) and aversion are experimentally accessible, and one of the few specific test paradigms is measurement of positive and negative orofacial expressions when tasting pleasurable (typically sweet) or aversive stimuli ([11](#B11)).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A general feeling of satisfaction lingers long after meal termination and contributes to the reinforcing power of a meal.

    “Rather than the acute pleasure of tasty food in the mouth, there is a general feeling of satisfaction that lingers on long after termination, and most likely contributes to the reinforcing power of a meal.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Leptin and other metabolic signals act on a large number of brain systems.

    “However, during the last few years it became increasingly clear that leptin and the plethora of other metabolic signals not only act on the hypothalamus, but on a large number of brain systems.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Not all subjects exposed to the same toxic environment gain weight.

    “this simple explanation does not account for the fact that not all subjects exposed to the same toxic environment gain weight.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Environmental pressure pushes the general population to higher food intake and body weight.

    “Although environmental pressure undoubtedly pushes the general population to higher food intake and body weight”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Obesity-prone rats develop some degree of obesity even on regular chow diet.

    “Because obesity-prone rats develop some degree of obesity even on regular chow diet, it is also not clear to what extent the genetic difference depends on availability of palatable diet vs. chow, to be phenotypically expressed (susceptibility genes).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The homeostatic regulatory system has a strong inherent bias to defend against energy depletion more strongly than energy surplus.

    “Given these external conditions together with the strong inherent bias of the homeostatic regulatory system to defend against energy depletion more strongly than energy surplus, weight is easily gained but not so easily lost.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The reward system is complex and cannot be easily manipulated with drugs or genetic deletions.

    “This is most likely because the reward system is complex and cannot be easily manipulated with drugs or genetic deletions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The concept of food addiction is still not generally accepted, and its behavioral and neurological mechanisms remain obscure.

    “While the field of drug addiction has a long tradition (e.g., Refs. [96](#B96), [132](#B132)), the concept of food addiction is still not generally accepted, and its behavioral and neurological mechanisms remain obscure.”
16 of 16

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ingestive behavior is regulated not only homeostatically but also by nonhomeostatic brain circuits that process the reward-related qualities of food intake.

    “Ingestive behavior is not only regulated homeostatically (i.e., by central nervous pathways that respond to energy depletion) but also by nonhomeostatic brain circuits that process the reward-related, “hedonic” qualities of food intake (19).”

    From Oxytocin Reduces Reward-Driven Food Intake in Humans (2013) · cites this paper as [19]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rosenbaum M, 2008, J Clin Invest, 118, 2583
  2. Verhagen JV, 2006, Brain Res Brain Res Rev

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berthoud, H.-R., Lenard, N. R., & Shin, A. C.
Affiliations
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Berthoud, Hans-Rudolf
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
2011-06
Volume
300
Issue
6
Pages
R1266-R1277
ISSN
  • 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1490
OpenAlex
W2141794225
Cited by
275
References
208
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-47348, R01DK071082, DK071082, R01DK047348)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
food reward, hyperphagia, obesity, incentive salience, palatable food intake, brain reward system, sensitization, inflammatory signaling, oxidative stress, mitochondrial stress, drug addiction, alcoholism, eating disorders, obesity-related comorbidities
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Hyperphagia, Neural Pathways, Obesity, Reward, Signal Transduction, Behavior, Addictive, Models, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review