Cited by 274Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesStress Responses and Cortisol

Human interaction and cortisol: can human contact reduce stress for shelter dogs?

Coppola, Crista L., Grandin, Temple, Enns, R. Mark·2006·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Animal shelters are an extremely stressful environment for a dog, most specifically due to social isolation and novel surroundings. The stress response of dogs housed in this environment may be alleviated through human interaction shortly after arrival. During their second day in a public animal shelter, adult stray dogs were either engaged in a human contact session or not. The session involved taking the dog into an outdoor enclosure, playing with the dog, grooming, petting and reviewing basic obedience commands. Each dog interacted with a human for approximately 45 min. Salivary cortisol levels were examined from each dog on their 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 9th day of housing. Animals that engaged in a human contact session had lower cortisol levels on day 3 than animals that did not. Breed type, sex and age did not have an effect on cortisol levels on any day measured. A human interaction session can be beneficial to both animal welfare and adoption procedures. The current study not only utilized the human contact session as a treatment to reduce stress but also as a resource for individual temperament/personality information that could be later used to facilitate compatible adoptions. Human interaction may be an effective means of reducing the cortisol response of dogs in the aversive shelter environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.12.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two main reasons underlie the development of ARBs in companion animals: first, many companion animals are social species eager for social contact, and the need for social contact with either conspecifics and/or humans can remain unfulfilled if owners work from nine to five, five days a week with the pet staying alone at home on a daily basis.

    “Two main reasons underlie the development of ARBs in our companion animals. First of all, a lot of companion animals are social species eager for social contact. In the human–companion animal bond, the need for social contact with either conspecifics and/or humans [70,71] can remain unfulfilled if owners work from nine to five, five days a week with the pet staying alone at home on a daily basis.”
  • Within shelters, dogs are exposed to environmental stressors such as noise, novelty, unpredictability, confinement for extended periods, and minimal human interactions.

    “Within shelters, dogs are exposed to a variety of environmental stressors such as noise (2), novelty, unpredictability, confinement for extended periods (3), and minimal human interactions (4).”
  • Previous research in shelter dogs has demonstrated reductions in behavioral and physiological indicators of negative affect through provisions of positive human-animal interactions.

    “While research to date has not specifically explored ways to reduce excessive arousal, previous research in shelter dogs has demonstrated reductions in behavioral (e.g., vocalizations, panting) and physiological (e.g., heart rate and cortisol) indicators of negative affect through provisions of positive human-animal interactions, such as petting sessions or physical exercise (4, 27–33).”
  • Shelter dogs exposed to 45 min human contact sessions had lower glucocorticoid concentration than dogs not exposed to these sessions.

    “One study looked at the impacts of a 45 min human contact session on shelter dogs and found that dogs that were exposed to these human contact sessions had lower glucocorticoid concentration than dogs that were not exposed to this human contact [26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coppola, C. L., Grandin, T., & Enns, R. M.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Coppola, Crista L.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
87
Issue
3
Pages
537-541
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115773075
Cited by
274
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
shelter dogs, human contact, salivary cortisol, stress reduction, animal welfare, stray dogs, social isolation, novel environment, adoption, temperament assessment, dog personality, obedience training
MeSH terms
Animals, Human-Animal Bond, Dogs, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Saliva, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review