CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 93

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Single-photon quantum error rejection and correction with linear optics

Kalamidas, Demetrios·2005·Physics Letters A
DOI 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.06.034
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.06.034

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A single-qubit error correction circuit can be constructed with polarising beam splitters, half-wave plates, and Pockels cells.

    “In a similar fashion, a single-qubit error correction circuit can be constructed with polarising beam splitters, half-wave plates, and Pockels cells (Kalamidas 2005).”

    From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Kalamidas 2005

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Steane, 1996, Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 793, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.793 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Shor, 1995, Phys. Rev. A, 52, R2493, 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.R2493 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Laflamme, 1996, Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 198, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.198 · DOI
  4. Pittman, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 257902, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.257902 · DOI
  5. Pittman, 2001, Phys. Rev. A, 64, 062311, 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062311 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Brendel, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, 2594, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2594 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Shih, 2003, IEEE J. Selected Topics Quant. Electron., 9, 1455, 10.1109/JSTQE.2003.820927 · DOI
  8. Bouwmeester, 2001, Phys. Rev. A, 63, 040301, 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.040301 · DOI
  9. Wang, 2004, Phys. Rev. A, 69, 022320, 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.022320 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kalamidas, D.
Venue
Physics Letters A
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
343
Issue
5
Pages
331-335
ISSN
0375-9601
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2005.06.034
Cited by
93
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review