Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Elliptic flow and incomplete equilibration at RHIC

Open access
Bhalerao, Rajeev S., Blaizot, Jean-Paul, Borghini, Nicolas, Ollitrault, Jean-Yves·2005·Physics Letters B

Abstract

Abstract We argue that RHIC data, in particular those on the anisotropic flow coefficients v 2 and v 4 , suggest that the matter produced in the early stages of nucleus–nucleus collisions is incompletely thermalized. We interpret the parameter ( 1 / S ) ( d N / d y ) , where S is the transverse area of the collision zone and d N / d y the multiplicity density, as an indicator of the number of collisions per particle at the time when elliptic flow is established, and hence as a measure of the degree of equilibration. This number serves as a control parameter which can be varied experimentally by changing the system size, the centrality or the beam energy. We provide predictions for Cu–Cu collisions at RHIC as well as for Pb–Pb collisions at the LHC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.08.131

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Ollitrault, 1998, Nucl. Phys. A, 638, 195c, 10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00413-8 · DOI
  2. Adams, 2005, Phys. Rev. C, 72, 014904, 10.1103/PhysRevC.72.014904 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Adler, 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 182301, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.182301 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Alt, 2003, Phys. Rev. C, 68, 034903, 10.1103/PhysRevC.68.034903 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ollitrault, 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 46, 229, 10.1103/PhysRevD.46.229 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Molnár, 2002, Nucl. Phys. A, 697, 495, 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01224-6 · doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(01)01224-6
  7. Molnár, 2002, Nucl. Phys. A, 703, 893, 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)00859-X · doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(02)00859-x
  8. Molnár, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 012302, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.012302 · DOI
  9. Gyulassy, 2005, Nucl. Phys. A, 750, 30, 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.10.034 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Shuryak, 2005, Nucl. Phys. A, 750, 64, 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.10.022 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Baier, 2001, Phys. Lett. B, 502, 51, 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00191-5 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Baier, 2002, Phys. Lett. B, 539, 46, 10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02037-3 · DOI
  13. Arnold, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 072302, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.072302 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Rebhan, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 102303, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.102303 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Teaney, 2003, Phys. Rev. C, 68, 034913, 10.1103/PhysRevC.68.034913 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Knudsen, 1909, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig), 28, 75, 10.1002/andp.19093330106 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hirano, 2002, Phys. Rev. C, 65, 011901, 10.1103/PhysRevC.65.011901 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Heinz, 2004, J. Phys. G, 30, S1229, 10.1088/0954-3899/30/8/096 · DOI
  19. Kolb, 2003, Phys. Rev. C, 68, 031902(R), 10.1103/PhysRevC.68.031902 · DOI
  20. Heinz, 2002, Phys. Rev. C, 66, 014907, 10.1103/PhysRevC.66.014907 · DOI

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Bhalerao, R. S., Blaizot, J.-P., Borghini, N., & Ollitrault, J.-Y.
Venue
Physics Letters B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
627
Issue
1-4
Pages
49-54
ISSN
0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150822136
Cited by
201
References
0
FWCI
12.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elliptic flow and incomplete equilibration at RHIC. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physletb.2005.08.131
The paper
Bhalerao, R. S., Blaizot, J.-P., Borghini, N., & Ollitrault, J.-Y. (2005). Elliptic flow and incomplete equilibration at RHIC. Physics Letters B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2005.08.131

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.