The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spontaneous breaking of Lorentz invariance, black holes and perpetuum mobile of the 2nd kind
Open accessAbstract
We study the effect of spontaneous breaking of Lorentz invariance on black hole thermodynamics. We consider a scenario where Lorentz symmetry breaking manifests itself by the difference of maximal velocities attainable by particles of different species in a preferred reference frame. The Lorentz breaking sector is represented by the ghost condensate. We find that the notions of black hole entropy and temperature loose their universal meaning. In particular, the standard derivation of the Hawking radiation yields that a black hole does emit thermal radiation in any given particle species, but with temperature depending on the maximal attainable velocity of this species. We demonstrate that this property implies violation of the second law of thermodynamics, and hence, allows construction of a perpetuum mobile of the 2nd kind. We discuss possible interpretation of these results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Particle creation by black holes
Hawking, S. W. (1975) · Communications In Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02345020 · Cited by 13,106
4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space
Dvali, G., Gabadadze, G., & Porrati, M. (2000) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00669-9 · Cited by 3,513
High-energy tests of Lorentz invariance
Coleman, S., & Glashow, S. L. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.116008 · Cited by 1,149
Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame
Jacobson, T., & Mattingly, D. (2001) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.024028 · Cited by 944
Cited by
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
Imperfect dark energy from kinetic gravity braiding
Deffayet, C., Pujolàs, O., Sawicki, I., & Vikman, A. (2010) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/10/026 · Cited by 704
Consistent Extension of Hořava Gravity
Blas, D., Pujolàs, O., & Sibiryakov, S. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.181302 · Cited by 591
Self-citationViscosity bound violation in higher derivative gravity
Brigante, M., Liu, H., Myers, R. C., Shenker, S., & Yaida, S. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.126006 · Cited by 565
Models of non-relativistic quantum gravity: the good, the bad and the healthy
Blas, D., Pujolàs, O., & Sibiryakov, S. (2011) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2011)018 · Cited by 362
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dubovsky, S. L., & Sibiryakov, S. M.
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 638
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 509-514
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003430944
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
