Cited by 1,149Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

High-energy tests of Lorentz invariance

Open access
Coleman, Sidney, Glashow, Sheldon L.·1999·Physical Review D

Abstract

We develop a perturbative framework with which to discuss departures from exact Lorentz invariance and explore their potentially observable ramifications. Tiny noninvariant terms introduced into the standard model Lagrangian are assumed to be renormalizable (dimension \ensuremath{\leqslant}4), invariant under $\mathrm{SU}(3)\ensuremath{\bigotimes}\mathrm{SU}(2)\ensuremath{\bigotimes}U(1)$ gauge transformations, and rotationally and translationally invariant in a preferred frame. There are a total of 46 independent CPT-even perturbations of this kind, all of which preserve anomaly cancellation. They define the energy-momentum eigenstates and their maximal attainable velocities in the high-energy limit. The effects of these perturbations increase rapidly with energy in the preferred frame, more rapidly than those of CPT-odd perturbations. Our analysis of Lorentz-violating kinematics reveals several striking new phenomena that are relevant both to cosmic-ray physics (e.g., by undoing the Greisen, Zatsepin, and Kuz'min cutoff) and neutrino physics (e.g., by generating novel types of neutrino oscillations). These may lead to new and sensitive high-energy tests of special relativity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.59.116008

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At a threshold for a particle with momentum p1, the configuration is the minimum energy configuration of all other particles that conserves momentum.

    “Theorem 1: The configuration at a threshold for a particle with momentum p1 is the minimum energy configuration of all other particles that conserves momentum.”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [88]

  • A vacuum Čerenkov effect must be forbidden up to the highest observed UHECR energy.

    “A complimentary constraint to the GZK analysis can be derived by recognizing that 1019 − 1020 eV protons reach us — a vacuum Čerenkov effect must be forbidden up to the highest observed UHECR energy [88, 154, 119].”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [88]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [5][5] D. Colladay and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 6760, D58 (1998) 116002, and earlier references therein. -
  2. [6][6] E.g. , S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields I , § 4.6 and § 4.8, Cambridge U. Press, 1995. -
  3. [8][8] Versions of this section appear in: S.L. Glashow, in Proc. TAUP-97 Nucl.Phys. B70 Proc. Suppl. (1999) 70; S. L. Glashow, in Proc. First Tropical Workshop, San Juan, Puerto Rico, ed. Jos´ e F. Nieves, AIP Conf. Proc. 444 (1998) 119. -
  4. [11][11] S. Coleman and S.L. Glashow, HUTP-98/A080, to appear in Proc. Neutrino '98, Takayama, Japan. -
  5. [15][15] R. Cowsik and B.V. Sreekantan, hep-ph/9811241 (to appear in Physics Letters B), and private communication. - · arXiv
  6. [19][19] R. Foot, C.N. Leung, and O. Yasuda, hep-ph/9809458 . - · arXiv
  7. [20][20] T. Kajita (for the SuperKamiokande Collaboration), to appear in Proc. Neutrino '98, Takayama, Japan. -
  8. [28][28] AGASA Collab. e.g., M. Takeda et.al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1163; Fly's Eye Collab. e.g., D.J. Bird et al., Astrophys. J. 424 (1995 144; Haverah Park Collab. See: M.A. Lawrence et al., J. Phys. G17 (1991) 733; Yakutsk Collab. e.g., N.N. Efimov et al., in 22nd Intl. Cosmic Ray Conf. (1991) Dublin. -
  9. [29][29] See M. Takeda [28] and V. Berezinsky, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 70 (1999) 419 for further references in these connections. -
  10. [31][31] T.J. Weiler, hep-ph/9710431 . - · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coleman, S., & Glashow, S. L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1999-04-28
Volume
59
Issue
11
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2149558418
Cited by
1,149
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 69
FWCI
37.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
Lorentz violation, preferred frame, cosmic ray propagation, GZK cutoff, neutrino oscillations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review