The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Renormalization group evolution of dimension-six baryon number violating operators
Open accessAbstract
We calculate the one-loop anomalous dimension matrix for the dimension-six baryon number violating operators of the Standard Model effective field theory, including right-handed neutrino fields. We discuss the flavor structure of the renormalization group evolution in the contexts of minimal flavor violation and unification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Symmetry Breaking through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies
't Hooft, G. (1976) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.37.8 · Cited by 3,362
Cited by
The standard model as an effective field theory
Brivio, I., & Trott, M. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.002 · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Alonso, R., Chang, H.-M., Jenkins, E. E., Manohar, A. V., & Shotwell, B.
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 734
- Pages
- 302-307
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078965692
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Renormalization group evolution of dimension-six baryon number violating operators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.05.065
- The paper
- Alonso, R., Chang, H.-M., Jenkins, E. E., Manohar, A. V., & Shotwell, B. (2014). Renormalization group evolution of dimension-six baryon number violating operators. Physics Letters B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.05.065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
