Deep learning at scale for the construction of galaxy catalogs in the Dark Energy Survey
Open accessAbstract
The scale of ongoing and future electromagnetic surveys pose formidable challenges to classify astronomical objects. Pioneering efforts on this front include citizen science campaigns adopted by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). SDSS datasets have been recently used to train neural network models to classify galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) that overlap the footprint of both surveys. Herein, we demonstrate that knowledge from deep learning algorithms, pre-trained with real-object images, can be transferred to classify galaxies that overlap both SDSS and DES surveys, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy ≳99.6%. We demonstrate that this process can be completed within just eight minutes using distributed training. While this represents a significant step towards the classification of DES galaxies that overlap previous surveys, we need to initiate the characterization of unlabelled DES galaxies in new regions of parameter space. To accelerate this program, we use our neural network classifier to label over ten thousand unlabelled DES galaxies, which do not overlap previous surveys. Furthermore, we use our neural network model as a feature extractor for unsupervised clustering and find that unlabelled DES images can be grouped together in two distinct galaxy classes based on their morphology, which provides a heuristic check that the learning is successfully transferred to the classification of unlabelled DES images. We conclude by showing that these newly labelled datasets can be combined with unsupervised recursive training to create large-scale DES galaxy catalogs in preparation for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope era.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CNNs excel at morphological classification of galaxies.
“Shown most prominently by the winners of the 'Galaxy Challenge' (Dieleman et al. 2015) and numerous subsequent works since (Dom´ ınguez S´ anchez et al. 2018, 2019; Khan et al. 2019; Walmsley et al. 2020; Spindler et al. 2020; Vega-Ferrero et al. 2020), CNNs excel at this task.”
From Self-supervised Representation Learning for Astronomical Images (2021) · cites this paper as Khan et al. 2019
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.03385 · Cited by 4,196 · see citing works
Using transfer learning to detect galaxy mergers
Ackermann, S., Schawinski, K., Zhang, C., Weigel, A. K., & Turp, M. D. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1398 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Galaxy Zoo: probabilistic morphology through Bayesian CNNs and active learning
Walmsley, M., Smith, L., Lintott, C., Gal, Y., Bamford, S., Dickinson, H., Fortson, L., Kruk, S., Masters, K., Scarlata, C., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2816 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-supervised Representation Learning for Astronomical Images
Hayat, M. A., Stein, G., Harrington, P., Lukić, Z., & Mustafa, M. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abf2c7 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“Shown most prominently by the winners of the “Galaxy Challenge” (Dieleman et al. 2015) and numerous subsequent works since (Domínguez Sánchez et al. 2018, 2019; Khan et al. 2019; Spindler et al. 2020; Vega-Ferrero et al. 2020; Walmsley et al. 2020), CNNs excel at this task.”
BackgroundTanoglidis, D., Ćiprijanović, A., Drlica-Wagner, A., Nord, B., Wang, M. H. L. S., Amsellem, A. J., Downey, K., Jenkins, S., Kafkes, D., & Zhang, Z. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.08246 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Indeed, cross-survey transfer learning has already been shown to signi(cid:12)cantly reduce the need for large annotated datasets in deep learning-based classi(cid:12)cation cases (e.g., Dom(cid:19)(cid:16)nguez S(cid:19)anchez et al., 2019; Khan et al., 2019; Tanoglidis et al., 2021a).”
Background
- Authors
- Khan, A., Huerta, E. A., Wang, S., Gruendl, R., Jennings, E., & Zheng, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Argonne National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Khan, Asad
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 795
- Pages
- 248-258
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2951545958
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physics Letters B (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- galaxy classification, Dark Energy Survey, Sloan Digital Sky Survey, pre-trained neural networks, knowledge transfer, distributed training, galaxy morphology, unsupervised clustering, galaxy catalog, citizen science, LSST, astronomical image classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review