DeepGhostBusters: Using Mask R-CNN to Detect and Mask Ghosting and Scattered-Light Artifacts from Optical Survey Images
Open accessAbstract
Wide-field astronomical surveys are often affected by the presence of undesirable reflections (often known as "ghosting artifacts" or "ghosts") and scattered-light artifacts. The identification and mitigation of these artifacts is important for rigorous astronomical analyses of faint and low-surface-brightness systems. However, the identification of ghosts and scattered-light artifacts is challenging due to a) the complex morphology of these features and b) the large data volume of current and near-future surveys. In this work, we use images from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) to train, validate, and test a deep neural network (Mask R-CNN) to detect and localize ghosts and scattered-light artifacts. We find that the ability of the Mask R-CNN model to identify affected regions is superior to that of conventional algorithms and traditional convolutional neural networks methods. We propose that a multi-step pipeline combining Mask R-CNN segmentation with a classical CNN classifier provides a powerful technique for the automated detection of ghosting and scattered-light artifacts in current and near-future surveys.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior work has used CNNs to identify cosmic rays and detect ghosts/scattered light, and IQA algorithms to score LS images.
“For example, Zhang & Bloom (2020) and Chang et al. (2021) used Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to, respectively, identify cosmic rays in Hubble Space Telescope images, and detect ghosts and scattered light in Dark Energy Survey (DES) images; Tanoglidis et al. (2021) applied a method based on a Mask Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network (RCNN) to predict the location of ghosts and scatter”
From A Semi-Supervised Learning Method for the Identification of Bad Exposures in Large Imaging Surveys (2026) · cites this paper as Tanoglidis et al. (2021)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In the (cid:12)rst stage of the model, the input images are fed into a pre-trained deep CNN | such as VGG (Simonyan and Zisserman, 2014) or ResNet (He et al., 2015) | also called the backbone network.”
MethodHao, X.-B., & Zhang, G.-G. (2017) · Encycl. Semantic Comput. Robotic Intell. · doi:10.1142/s2425038416300184 · Cited by 86,177
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 74,248 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In the (cid:12)rst stage of the model, the input images are fed into a pre-trained deep CNN | such as VGG (Simonyan and Zisserman, 2014) or ResNet (He et al., 2015) | also called the backbone network.”
MethodGradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recently, Chang et al. (2021) demonstrated an alternative approach using a convolutional neural network (CNN; Lecun et al., 1998) to classify DES images containing ghosts and scattered-light artifacts.”
MethodMicrosoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…the learning procedure (i.e., use transfer learning) us-ing the weights learned from training Mask R-CNN on the Microsoft Common Objects in Context (MS COCO) dataset 11 (Lin et al., 2014), which consists of ∼ 330k images ( ∼ 2 : 5M object instances) of 91 classes of common or everyday objects.”
MethodFeature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The loss of the RPN network is composed of a binary classi(cid:12)cation loss, L RPN,cls , and a bounding box regression loss, Each of the proposed RoIs has a di(cid:11)erent size. the one we are using in this work { use a Feature Pyramid Network (FPN; Lin et al., 2016) on top of the backbone.”
MethodA survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
Shorten, C., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2019) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0 · Cited by 13,203 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To reduce over(cid:12)tting, we employ data augmentation (e.g., Shorten and Khoshgoftaar, 2019), by performing geometric transformations on the images and the masks.”
MethodA Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learning
Zhuang, F., Qi, Z., Duan, K., Xi, D., Zhu, Y., Zhu, H., Xiong, H., & He, Q. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2020.3004555 · Cited by 6,678 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Incomputer vision problems where only a small training set is available, it is common to use transfer learning to improve results (for recent reviews, see Wang and Deng 2018 and Zhuang et al. 2019).”
MethodObject Detection With Deep Learning: A Review
Zhao, Z.-Q., Zheng, P., Xu, S.-T., & Wu, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2018.2876865 · Cited by 5,545 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Object detection (e.g., for a review, Zhao et al., 2018) is an active area of research in computer vision, with the goal of developing algorithms that can (cid:12)nd the positions of objects within an image.”
BackgroundTHE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FLORA IN THE ALPINE ZONE. <sup>1</sup>
Jaccard, P. (1912) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x · Cited by 4,561 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To de(cid:12)ne the detection of an artifact, we introduce the concept of the Intersection over Union (IoU; also known as the Jaccard index; Jaccard 1912), which quanti(cid:12)es the overlap between the masks of the ground truth and the prediction.”
MethodLSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Alonso, D., AlSayyad, Y., Anderson, S. F., Andrew, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c · Cited by 4,357 · see citing works
Image segmentation using deep learning: A survey
Minaee, S., Boykov, Y. Y., Porikli, F., Plaza, A. J., Kehtarnavaz, N., & Terzopoulos, D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3059968 · Cited by 3,796 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Semantic segmentation (e.g., for a review, Minaee et al., 2020) on the other hand refers to the problem of pixel-level classi(cid:12)cation of different parts of an image into pre-de(cid:12)ned categories.”
BackgroundDeep visual domain adaptation: A survey
Wang, M., & Deng, W. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.05.083 · Cited by 2,209 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Incomputer vision problems where only a small training set is available, it is common to use transfer learning to improve results (for recent reviews, see Wang and Deng 2018 and Zhuang et al. 2019).”
MethodSelf-citationLSST Science Book, Version 2.0
Abell, P., Allison, J., Anderson, S., Andrew, J., Angel, J. R., Armus, L., Arnett, D., Asztalos, S., Axelrod, T., Bailey, S., et al. (2009) · doi:10.2172/1156415 · Cited by 1,437 · cited 1×
“3 Furthermore, the deeper imaging of LSST will place even tighter requirements on low-surface-brightness artifacts (LSST Science Collaboration, 2009; Brough et al., 2020).”
BackgroundThe VIA Annotation Software for Images, Audio and Video
Dutta, A., & Zisserman, A. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3343031.3350535 · Cited by 1,120 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To create these masks, we used the VGG Image Anno-tator (VIA; Dutta and Zisserman (2019)) 5 , a simple manual annotation software for images, audio, and video.”
MethodRotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology prediction
Dieleman, S., Willett, K. W., & Dambre, J. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv632 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview
Abbott, D., Abdalla, F., Aleksic, J., Allam, S., Amara, A., Bacon, D., Balbinot, E., Banerji, M., Bechtol, K., Benoit-Lévy, A., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Self-citationFlaugher, B., Diehl, H., Honscheid, K., Abbott, T., Alvarez, O., Angstadt, R., Annis, J., Antonik, M., Ballester, O., Beaufore, L., et al. (2004) · The Dark Energy Survey · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/5/150 · Cited by 710 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The observations were obtained with DECam, a 570-megapixel camera mounted on the 4m Blanco Telescope at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO) in Chile (Flaugher et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationA survey on instance segmentation: state of the art
Hafiz, A. M., & Bhat, G. M. (2020) · International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval · doi:10.1007/s13735-020-00195-x · Cited by 568 · see citing works
He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollár, P., & Girshick, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.06870 · Cited by 406 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We use Mask R-CNN (He et al., 2017), a popular, state-of-the art instance segmentation algorithm, to detect and mask ghost and scattered-light artifacts.”
MethodThe Dark Energy Survey Data Release 2
Abbott, T. M. C., Adamów, M., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Amon, A., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Banerji, M., Bechtol, K., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac00b3 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Self-citationUltra–Low Surface Brightness Imaging with the Dragonfly Telephoto Array
Abraham, R. G., & van Dokkum, P. G. (2013) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/674875 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Star–galaxy classification using deep convolutional neural networks
Kim, E. J., & Brunner, R. J. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2672 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Illuminating Low Surface Brightness Galaxies with the Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey
Greco, J. P., Greene, J. E., Strauss, M. A., Macarthur, L. A., Flowers, X., Goulding, A. D., Huang, S., Kim, J. H., Komiyama, Y., Leauthaud, A., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab842 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
CMU DeepLens: deep learning for automatic image-based galaxy–galaxy strong lens finding
Lanusse, F., Ma, Q., Li, N., Collett, T. E., Li, C.-L., Ravanbakhsh, S., Mandelbaum, R., & Póczos, B. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1665 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
AUTOMATED TRANSIENT IDENTIFICATION IN THE DARK ENERGY SURVEY
Goldstein, D., D'Andrea, C., Fischer, J., Foley, R., Gupta, R., Kessler, R., Kim, A., Nichol, R., Nugent, P., Papadopoulos, A., et al. (2015) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/82 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationShadows in the Dark: Low-surface-brightness Galaxies Discovered in the Dark Energy Survey
Tanoglidis, D., Drlica-Wagner, A., Wei, K., Li, T. S., Sánchez, J., Zhang, Y., Peter, A. H. G., Feldmeier-Krause, A., Prat, J., Casey, K., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abca89 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationFinding Strong Gravitational Lenses in the DESI DECam Legacy Survey
Huang, X., Storfer, C., Ravi, V., Pilon, A., Domingo, M., Schlegel, D. J., Bailey, S., Dey, A. T., Gupta, R. R., Herrera, D., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7ffb · Cited by 104 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…separation (e.g., Kim and Brunner, 2017), identi(cid:12)cation of strongly lensed systems (e.g., Lanusse et al., 2018; Davies et al., 2019; Bom et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2020, 2021), classifying galaxy mergers (e.g., (cid:19)Ciprijanovi(cid:19)c et al., 2021), and many other applications.”
BackgroundTransfer learning for galaxy morphology from one survey to another
Domínguez Sánchez, H., Huertas-Company, M., Bernardi, M., Kaviraj, S., Fischer, J. L., Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Annis, J., Avila, S., Brooks, D., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3497 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationDeblending and classifying astronomical sources with Mask R-CNN deep learning
Burke, C., Aleo, P., Chen, Y.-C., Liu, X., Peterson, J., Sembroski, G., & Lin, J. (2019) · Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2845 · Cited by 78 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Similarly to what was proposed in Burke et al. (2019), the training is performed in different stages with progressively smaller learning rates, α, at each stage.”
BackgroundMethodGalaxy detection and identification using deep learning and data augmentation
Gonz'alez, R., Muñoz, R., & Hern'andez, C. A. (2018) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2018.09.004 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Removing Internal Reflections from Deep Imaging Data Sets
Slater, C., Harding, P., & Mihos, J. (2009) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/648457 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Discovering New Strong Gravitational Lenses in the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys
Huang, X., Storfer, C., Gu, A., Ravi, V., Pilon, A., Sheu, W., Venguswamy, R., Banka, S., Dey, A., Landriau, M., et al. (2020) · Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd62b · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Using convolutional neural networks to identify gravitational lenses in astronomical images
Davies, A., Serjeant, S., & Bromley, J. M. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1288 · Cited by 58 · cited 3× · see citing works
“, Kim and Brunner, 2017), identification of strongly lensed systems (e.g., Lanusse et al., 2018; Davies et al., 2019; Bom et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2020, 2021), classifying galaxy mergers (e.”
BackgroundMethoddeepCR: Cosmic Ray Rejection with Deep Learning
Zhang, K.-M., & Bloom, J. (2019) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3fa6 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Galactic cirri in deep optical imaging
Román, J., Trujillo, I., & Montes, M. (2019) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936111 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Deep learning at scale for the construction of galaxy catalogs in the Dark Energy Survey
Khan, A., Huerta, E. A., Wang, S., Gruendl, R., Jennings, E., & Zheng, H. (2019) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.06.009 · Cited by 46 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Indeed, cross-survey transfer learning has already been shown to signi(cid:12)cantly reduce the need for large annotated datasets in deep learning-based classi(cid:12)cation cases (e.g., Dom(cid:19)(cid:16)nguez S(cid:19)anchez et al., 2019; Khan et al., 2019; Tanoglidis et al., 2021a).”
BackgroundĆiprijanović, A., Kafkes, D., Downey, K., Jenkins, S., Perdue, G., Madireddy, S., Johnston, T., Snyder, G. F., & Nord, B. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1677 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationCheng, T.-Y., Conselice, C., Aragón-Salamanca, A., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Bluck, A., Brooks, D., Burke, D., et al. (2021) · Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2142 · Cited by 35 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Since their invention, CNNs have found numerous applications in the field of astronomy, including galaxy morphology prediction (e.g., Dieleman et al., 2015; Cheng et al., 2021), star-galaxy separation (e.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationPaillassa, M., Bertin, E., & Bouy, H. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936345 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
DeepShadows: Separating low surface brightness galaxies from artifacts using deep learning
Tanoglidis, D., Ćiprijanović, A., & Drlica-Wagner, A. (2021) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2021.100469 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationDetection and removal of artifacts in astronomical images
Desai, S., Mohr, J., Bertin, E., Kummel, M., & Wetzstein, M. (2016) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2016.04.002 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
The Vera Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time and the Low Surface Brightness UniversePreprint
Brough, S., Collins, C., Demarco, R., Ferguson, H., Galaz, G., Holwerda, B., Martínez-Lombilla, C., Mihos, C., & Montes, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.11067 · Cited by 14 · cited 4× · see citing works
“3 Furthermore, the deeper imaging of LSST will place even tighter requirements on low-surface-brightness artifacts (LSST Science Collaboration, 2009; Brough et al., 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialCrowdsourcing quality control for Dark Energy Survey images
Melchior, P., Sheldon, E., Drlica-Wagner, A., Rykoff, E., Abbott, T., Abdalla, F., Allam, S., Benoit-Lévy, A., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., et al. (2015) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2016.04.003 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…are also promising for di(cid:11)erent, but related, problems, such as the the detection of artifacts from cosmic rays, satellite trails, etc. (e.g., Goldstein et al., 2015; Desai et al., 2016; Melchior et al., 2016; Zhang and Bloom, 2020; Rom(cid:19)an et al., 2020; Pail-lassa et al., 2020)”
BackgroundSelf-citationBom, C. R., Poh, J., Nord, B., Valentín, M. B., & Dias, L. O. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.06341 · Cited by 10 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…separation (e.g., Kim and Brunner, 2017), identi(cid:12)cation of strongly lensed systems (e.g., Lanusse et al., 2018; Davies et al., 2019; Bom et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2020, 2021), classifying galaxy mergers (e.g., (cid:19)Ciprijanovi(cid:19)c et al., 2021), and many other…”
BackgroundSelf-citationChang, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Kent, S. M., Nord, B., Wang, D. M., & Wang, M. H. L. S. (2021) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2021.100474 · Cited by 9 · cited 11× · see citing works
“2 of Chang et al. 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationDark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Photometric Dataset for Cosmology
Bechtol, K., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Drlica-Wagner, A., Yanny, B., Gruendl, R. A., Sheldon, E. S., Rykoff, E. S., de Vicente, J., Adamów, M., Anbajagane, D., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae18d3 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationThe low-surface-brightness Universe: a new frontier in the study of galaxy evolutionPreprint
Kaviraj, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.01728 · Cited by 4 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…image area with relatively low surface brightness, they constitute a signi(cid:12)cant source of contamination in studies of the low-surface-brightness Universe, a major goal of current and upcoming surveys (e.g., Greco et al., 2018; Brough et al., 2020; Kaviraj, 2020; Tanoglidis et al., 2021b).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
13 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Bertin, E., 2012. Displaying Digital Deep Sky Images, in: Ballester, P., Egret, D., Lorente, N.P.F. (Eds.), Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXI, p. 263.
- DES Collaboration, 2005. The Dark Energy Survey. arXiv e-prints , astro-ph/0510346 arXiv:astro-ph/0510346. · arXiv
- DES Collaboration, Abbott, T.M.C., Abdalla, F.B., Alarcon, A., et al., 2018. Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Phys. Rev. D 98, 043526. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD. 98.043526 , arXiv:1708.01530. · DOI
- DES Collaboration, Abbott, T.M.C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., et al., 2021b. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing. arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2105.13549 arXiv:2105.13549. · arXiv
- Dieleman, S., Willett, K.W., Dambre, J., 2015. Rotationinvariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology prediction. MNRAS 450, 1441-1459. doi: 10. 1093/mnras/stv632 , arXiv:1503.07077. · arXiv
- Gkioxari, G., Malik, J., Johnson, J., 2019. Mesh R-CNN. arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1906.02739 arXiv:1906.02739. · arXiv
- [arXiv:2011.12437.](http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.12437) · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys
Huertas-Company, M., & Lanusse, F. (2023) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.55 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Martin, G., Bazkiaei, A. E., Spavone, M., Iodice, E., Mihos, J. C., Montes, M., Benavides, J. A., Brough, S., Carlin, J. L., Collins, C. A., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1003 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
The DECam Local Volume Exploration Survey Data Release 2
Drlica-Wagner, A., Ferguson, P., Adamów, M., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bacon, D., Bechtol, K., Bell, E., Bertin, E., et al. (2022) · Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac78eb · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationĆiprijanović, A., Kafkes, D., Snyder, G. F., Sánchez, J., Perdue, G., Pedro, K., Nord, B., Madireddy, S., & Wild, S. M. (2022) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ac7f1a · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Optimization-Based Technology Applied for Face Skin Symptom Detection
Liao, Y., Chang, P.-C., Wang, C.-C., & Li, H.-H. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10122396 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Compared with other algorithms, it has a higher processing speed.”
Bhavanam, S. R., Channappayya, S. S., Srijith, P. K., & Desai, S. (2024) · Astrophysics and Space Science · doi:10.1007/s10509-024-04357-9 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Moreover, DL algorithms have been shown to be very effective in detecting contaminants in astronomical images such as cosmic ray hits (Zhang and Bloom, 2020; Xu et al, 2023; Bhavanam et al, 2022a,b), spurious reflections (“ghosts”), and light scattering (Tanoglidis et al, 2022; Chang et al, 2021).”
Guo, L., Meng, J.-M., Hao, W., & Jain, D. K. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0329945 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Fig 1 shows the working architecture of the Mask R-CNN module [2], which clarifies the whole processing flow from image input to mask output.”
Cosmic Ray rejection with attention augmented deep learning
Bhavanam, S. R., Channappayya, S. S., Srijith, P. K., & Desai, S. (2022) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2022.100625 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“The DL algorithms are also employed to detect other image artifacts, such as spurious reflections (commonly referred to as ”ghosts”) and the scattering of light off the surfaces of a camera and/or telescope (Tanoglidis et al., 2021; Chang et al., 2021).”
MethodFacemask Detection System using CNN Model
M, S., Debnath, S., R, R., & Ghildial, K. (2023) · 2023 International Conference on Recent Advances in Science and Engineering Technology (ICRASET) · doi:10.1109/icraset59632.2023.10420345 · Cited by 3
“According to [6], a multi-stage channel combining a traditional convolutional ney=ural network classifier with Mask R-CNN segmentation offers a potent method for the automatic finding of signing and scattered-light artefacts in present and upcoming reviews.”
MethodPanoptic Segmentation of Galactic Structures in LSB Images
Richards, F., Paiement, A., Xie, X., Sola, E., & Duc, P. (2023) · 2023 18th International Conference on Machine Vision and Applications (MVA) · doi:10.23919/mva57639.2023.10216057 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Further, this practice is standard in works combining astronomy and segmentation [2, 4, 18, 14].”
BackgroundA Semi-Supervised Learning Method for the Identification of Bad Exposures in Large Imaging Surveys
Luo, Y., Myers, A. D., Drlica-Wagner, A., Dematties, D., Borchani, S., Valdes, F., Dey, A., Schlegel, D., Zhou, R., & DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys Team (2026) · The Open Journal of Astrophysics · doi:10.33232/001c.158430 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“DR11 also includes exposures from the DECam Local Volume Exploration Survey (DELVE; Drlica-Wagner et al. 2021, 2022), which are incorporated in our dataset.”
Self-citationRodeghiero, G., Drlica-Wagner, A., Taranto, A., Rosignoli, L., Pollek, H., Pai, A., Jones, R., Howard, E., MacBride, S., Andrew, J., et al. (2026) · Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation · doi:10.1117/12.3103019 · Cited by 1
“◦ 5 off-axis [5, 6, 7].”
Self-citationTheofilatos, A., Viardin, A., & Sturz, L. (2026) · Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation · doi:10.1007/s40192-026-00462-5 · Cited by 1
Can AI Dream of Unseen Galaxies? Conditional Diffusion Model for Galaxy Morphology Augmentation
Ma, C.-R., Sun, Z.-C., Jing, T., Cai, Z., Ting, Y.-S., Huang, S., & Li, M.-Y. (2025) · Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae1f10 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…Stein et al. 2022; Keerthi-Vasan et al. 2023; Thuruthipilly et al. 2025), artifact detection and removal (e.g., Zhang & Bloom 2020; Xu et al. 2023; Tanoglidis et al. 2022; Zhang & Brandt 2021), and image restoration through super-resolution and denoising (e.g., Sweere et al. 2022; Dabbech et…”
Dataset of artefacts for machine learning applications in astronomy
Sreejith, S., Pruzhinskaya, M. V., Volnova, A. A., Krushinsky, V., Malanchev, K. L., Ishida, É. E. O., Lavrukhina, A. D., Semenikhin, T. A., Gangler, É., Kornilov, M., et al. (2025) · New Astronomy · doi:10.1016/j.newast.2025.102466 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Pai, A., Drlica-Wagner, A., Kelvin, L., Meyers, J. E., Urbach, E., Mueller, F., & Lupton, R. (2026) · Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation · doi:10.1117/12.3104153
Self-citationDAFF-Net: A detection and search method for small-scale low surface brightness galaxies
Chen, H., & Chen, J.-F. (2026) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2026.109285
Zhang, Y., Shen, C., Jiang, X., Qiu, B., Luo, A.-L., Ren, F., & Chen, Y.-L. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112119
Regression Analysis of Ghosting Artifacts in Temporal Fusion Videos Using AutoML
Kim, H., Khan, M. A., & Park, H. (2024) · International Conference on Big Data, Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/bcd61269.2024.10743103
“Similarly, Tanoglidis and Darrell [18] employed Mask R-CNN for artifact detection.”
MethodXAMI - A Benchmark Dataset for Artefact Detection in XMM-Newton Optical Images
Dima, E.-I., Gómez, P., Kruk, S., Kretschmar, P., Rosen, S., & Popa, C.-A. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.17323
“Instance segmentation techniques for astronomical sources present significant progress [27–29], yet there has been limited focus on artefacts detection [30].”
BackgroundYOLO-Q: Drone Aerial Target Detection
Xiao, H., Xie, X., Zhao, K., Song, P., Xie, W., & Zou, C. (2023) · 2023 IEEE 4th International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (PRML) · doi:10.1109/prml59573.2023.10348218
“YOLO-Z[1, 2]has demonstrated that adding a detection head to a shallower convolutional layer enables more efficient extraction of features of small targets.”
Background
- Authors
- Tanoglidis, D., Ćiprijanović, A., Drlica-Wagner, A., Nord, B., Wang, M. H. L. S., Amsellem, A. J., Downey, K., Jenkins, S., Kafkes, D., & Zhang, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tanoglidis, Dimitrios
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 39
- Pages
- 100580-100580
- ISSN
- 2213-1337 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2109.08246
- OpenAlex
- W3201590391
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Astronomy and Computing (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1536171, 2006340, DE-AC02-07CH11359, 1138766)
- U.S. Department of Energy (AC02-07CH11359, DE‐AC02‐07CH11359, DE-AC02-)
- European Commission
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
- Natural Resources, Energy and Science Authority of Sri Lanka
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (DE-AC02-07CH11359)
- European Regional Development Fund
- High Energy Physics
- Laboratory Directed Research and Development (DE-AC02-07CH11359)
- Fermilab (LDRD 2018-052)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- ghosting artifacts, artifact detection, Mask R-CNN, Dark Energy Survey, deep learning, image segmentation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
