The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
First evidence that non-metricity f(Q) gravity could challenge ΛCDM
Open accessAbstract
We propose a novel model in the framework of f(Q) gravity, which is a gravitational modification class arising from the incorporation of non-metricity. The model has General Relativity as a particular limit, it has the same number of free parameters to those of ΛCDM, however at a cosmological framework it gives rise to a scenario that does not have ΛCDM as a limit. Nevertheless, confrontation with observations at both background and perturbation levels, namely with Supernovae type Ia (SNIa), Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), cosmic chronometers (CC), and Redshift Space Distortion (RSD) data, reveals that the scenario, according to AIC, BIC and DIC information criteria, is in some datasets slightly preferred comparing to ΛCDM cosmology, although in all cases the two models are statistically indiscriminate. Finally, the model does not exhibit early dark energy features, and thus it immediately passes BBN constraints, while the variation of the effective Newton's constant lies well inside the observational bounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
<tt>emcee</tt>: The MCMC Hammer
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/670067 · Cited by 12,414
Capozziello, S., & De Laurentis, M. (2011) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.09.003 · Cited by 3,321
Alam, S., Ata, M., Bailey, S., Beutler, F., Bizyaev, D., Blazek, J. A., Bolton, A. S., Brownstein, J. R., Burden, A., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx721 · Cited by 3,056
Renormalization of higher-derivative quantum gravity
Stelle, K. S. (1977) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.16.953 · Cited by 2,563
Extended Theories of GravityPreprint
Capozzıello, S., Lobod, C. F. S. N., P, F. J., & Cinthia, A. E. G. V. (2010) · Cited by 1,660
Jiménez, J. B., Heisenberg, L., & Koivisto, T. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.044048 · Cited by 959
Jiménez, J. B., Heisenberg, L., Koivisto, T., & Pekar, S. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.103507 · Cited by 559
Modified Gravity and Cosmology: An Update by the CANTATA NetworkPreprint
Saridakis, E. N., Lazkoz, R., Salzano, V., Moniz, P. V., Capozzıello, S., Jiménez, J. B., Laurentis, M. D., Olmo, G. J., Akrami, Y., Bahamonde, S., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.12582 · Cited by 433
Self-citationLower Growth Rate from Recent Redshift Space Distortion Measurements than Expected from Planck
Macaulay, E., Wehus, I. K., & Eriksen, H. K. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.161301 · Cited by 297
Nesseris, S., Pantazis, G., & Perivolaropoulos, L. (2017) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.023542 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Anagnostopoulos, F. K., Basilakos, S., & Saridakis, E. N.
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 822
- Pages
- 136634
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3158107606
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 26.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First evidence that non-metricity f(Q) gravity could challenge ΛCDM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136634
- The paper
- Anagnostopoulos, F. K., Basilakos, S., & Saridakis, E. N. (2021). First evidence that non-metricity f(Q) gravity could challenge ΛCDM. Physics Letters B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136634
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
