The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lower Growth Rate from Recent Redshift Space Distortion Measurements than Expected from Planck
Open accessAbstract
We perform a metastudy of recently published redshift space distortion (RSD) measurements of the cosmological growth rate, f(z)σ8(z). We analyze the latest results from the 6dFGS, BOSS, LRG, WiggleZ, and VIPERS galaxy redshift surveys, and compare the measurements to expectations from Planck. In this Letter we point out that the RSD measurements are consistently lower than the values expected from Planck, and the relative scatter between the RSD measurements is lower than expected. A full resolution of this issue may require a more robust treatment of nonlinear effects in RSD models, although the trend for a low σ8 agrees with recent constraints on σ8 and Ω(m) from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts identified in Planck.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
A test of the nature of cosmic acceleration using galaxy redshift distortions
Guzzo, L., Pierleoni, M., Meneux, B., Branchini, E., Le Fèvre, O., Marinoni, C., Garilli, B., Blaizot, J., De Lucia, G., Pollo, A., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06555 · Cited by 654
Cited by
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
First evidence that non-metricity f(Q) gravity could challenge ΛCDM
Anagnostopoulos, F. K., Basilakos, S., & Saridakis, E. N. (2021) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136634 · Cited by 303
(2018) · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.103503 · Cited by 233
Nesseris, S., Pantazis, G., & Perivolaropoulos, L. (2017) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.023542 · Cited by 229
Stable and unstable cosmological models in bimetric massive gravity
Koennig, F., Akrami, Y., Amendola, L., Motta, M., & Solomon, A. R. (2014) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.124014 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Macaulay, E., Wehus, I. K., & Eriksen, H. K.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-10-14
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 161301-161301
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2051737331
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lower Growth Rate from Recent Redshift Space Distortion Measurements than Expected from Planck. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.111.161301
- The paper
- Macaulay, E., Wehus, I. K., & Eriksen, H. K. (2013). Lower Growth Rate from Recent Redshift Space Distortion Measurements than Expected from Planck. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.111.161301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
