The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The r-process of stellar nucleosynthesis: Astrophysics and nuclear physics achievements and mysteries
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The r-process, or the rapid neutron-capture process, of stellar nucleosynthesis is called for to explain the production of the stable (and some long-lived radioactive) neutron-rich nuclides heavier than iron that are observed in stars of various metallicities, as well as in the solar system. A very large amount of nuclear information is necessary in order to model the r-process. This concerns the static characteristics of a large variety of light to heavy nuclei between the valley of stability and the vicinity of the neutron-drip line, as well as their beta-decay branches or their reactivity. Fission probabilities of very neutron-rich actinides have also to be known in order to determine the most massive nuclei that have a chance to be involved in the r-process. Even the properties of asymmetric nuclear matter may enter the problem. The enormously challenging experimental and theoretical task imposed by all these requirements is reviewed, and the state-of-the-art development in the field is presented. Nuclear-physics-based and astrophysics-free r-process models of different levels of sophistication have been constructed over the years. We review their merits and their shortcomings. The ultimate goal of r-process studies is clearly to identify realistic sites for the development of the r-process. Here too, the challenge is enormous, and the solution still eludes us. For long, the core collapse supernova of massive stars has been envisioned as the privileged r-process location. We present a brief summary of the one- or multidimensional spherical or non-spherical explosion simulations available to-date. Their predictions are confronted with the requirements imposed to obtain an r-process. The possibility of r-nuclide synthesis during the decompression of the matter of neutron stars following their merging is also discussed. Given the uncertainties remaining on the astrophysical r-process site and on the involved nuclear physics, any confrontation between predicted r-process yields and observed abundances is clearly risky. A comparison dealing with observed r-nuclide abundances in very metal-poor stars and in the solar system is attempted on grounds of r-process models based on parametrised astrophysics conditions. The virtues of the r-process product actinides for dating old stars or the solar system are also critically reviewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Abundances of the elements: Meteoritic and solar
Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. (1989) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-x · Cited by 10,422
The Ame2003 atomic mass evaluation
Audi, G., Wapstra, A. H., & Thibault, C. (2003) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.003 · Cited by 4,796
Solar System Abundances and Condensation Temperatures of the Elements
Lodders, K. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/375492 · Cited by 4,787
Synthesis of the Elements in Stars
Burbidge, E. M., Burbidge, G. R., Fowler, W. A., & Hoyle, F. (1957) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.29.547 · Cited by 3,991
Nuclear Ground-State Masses and Deformations
Möller, P., Nix, J. R., Myers, W. D., et al. (1995) · Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables · doi:10.1006/adnd.1995.1002 · Cited by 3,963
Firestone, R. B., & Shirley, V. S. (1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,557
Swann, W. F. G. (1953) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(53)91142-9 · Cited by 2,866
Blatt, J. M., & Weisskopf, V. F. (1979) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-9959-2 · Cited by 2,595
Collapsars: Gamma‐Ray Bursts and Explosions in “Failed Supernovae”
MacFadyen, A. I., & Woosley, S. E. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307790 · Cited by 2,328
Weizs�cker, C. F. V. (1935) · Zeitschrift f�r Physik · doi:10.1007/bf01337700 · Cited by 2,241
Cited by
Neutron-Capture Elements in the Early Galaxy
Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., & Gallino, R. (2008) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145207 · Cited by 968
Light curves of the neutron star merger GW170817/SSS17a: Implications for r-process nucleosynthesis
Drout, M. R., Piro, A. L., Shappee, B. J., Kilpatrick, C. D., Simon, J. D., Contreras, C., Coulter, D. A., Foley, R. J., Siebert, M. R., Morrell, N., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaq0049 · Cited by 820
Bauswein, A., Goriely, S., & Janka, H.-T. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/773/1/78 · Cited by 567
Self-citationThe impact of individual nuclear properties on r-process nucleosynthesis
Mumpower, M. R., Surman, R., McLaughlin, G. C., & Aprahamian, A. (2016) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.09.001 · Cited by 477
Metzger, B. D. (2017) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0006-z · Cited by 438
Supernova Neutrinos: Production, Oscillations and Detection
Mirizzi, A., Tamborra, I., Janka, H., Saviano, N., Scholberg, K., Bollig, R., Hüdepohl, L., & Chakraborty, S. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.15161/oar.it/1446204340.05 · Cited by 366
CHEMICAL ABUNDANCES FOR 855 GIANTS IN THE GLOBULAR CLUSTER OMEGA CENTAURI (NGC 5139)
Johnson, C. I., & Pilachowski, C. A. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/722/2/1373 · Cited by 349
Barnes, J., Kasen, D., Wu, M.-R., & Martínez-Pinedo, G. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/2/110 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Arnould, M., Goriely, S., & Takahashi, K.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 450
- Issue
- 4-6
- Pages
- 97-213
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080290513
- Cited by
- 912
- References
- 136
- FWCI
- 12.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.