The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electron–positron pairs in physics and astrophysics: From heavy nuclei to black holes
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Due to the interaction of physics and astrophysics we are witnessing in these years a splendid synthesis of theoretical, experimental and observational results originating from three fundamental physical processes. They were originally proposed by Dirac, by Breit and Wheeler and by Sauter, Heisenberg, Euler and Schwinger. For almost seventy years they have all three been followed by a continued effort of experimental verification on Earth-based experiments. The Dirac process, e+e−→2γe+e−→2γ, has been by far the most successful. It has obtained extremely accurate experimental verification and has led as well to an enormous number of new physics in possibly one of the most fruitful experimental avenues by introduction of storage rings in Frascati and followed by the largest accelerators worldwide: DESY, SLAC etc. The Breit–Wheeler process, 2γ→e+e−2γ→e+e−, although conceptually simple, being the inverse process of the Dirac one, has been by far one of the most difficult to be verified experimentally. Only recently, through the technology based on free electron X-ray laser and its numerous applications in Earth-based experiments, some first indications of its possible verification have been reached. The vacuum polarization process in strong electromagnetic field, pioneered by Sauter, Heisenberg, Euler and Schwinger, introduced the concept of critical electric field Ec=me2c3/(eħ). It has been searched without success for more than forty years by heavy-ion collisions in many of the leading particle accelerators worldwide. The novel situation today is that these same processes can be studied on a much more grandiose scale during the gravitational collapse leading to the formation of a black hole being observed in Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs). This report is dedicated to the scientific race. The theoretical and experimental work developed in Earth-based laboratories is confronted with the theoretical interpretation of space-based observations of phenomena originating on cosmological scales. What has become clear in the last ten years is that all the three above mentioned processes, duly extended in the general relativistic framework, are necessary for the understanding of the physics of the gravitational collapse to a black hole. Vice versa, the natural arena where these processes can be observed in mutual interaction and on an unprecedented scale, is indeed the realm of relativistic astrophysics. We systematically analyze the conceptual developments which have followed the basic work of Dirac and Breit–Wheeler. We also recall how the seminal work of Born and Infeld inspired the work by Sauter, Heisenberg and Euler on effective Lagrangian leading to the estimate of the rate for the process of electron–positron production in a constant electric field. In addition to reviewing the intuitive semi-classical treatment of quantum mechanical tunneling for describing the process of electron–positron production, we recall the calculations in Quantum Electro-Dynamics of the Schwinger rate and effective Lagrangian for constant electromagnetic fields. We also review the electron–positron production in both time-alternating electromagnetic fields, studied by Brezin, Itzykson, Popov, Nikishov and Narozhny, and the corresponding processes relevant for pair production at the focus of coherent laser beams as well as electron-beam–laser collision. We finally report some current developments based on the general JWKB approach which allows us to compute the Schwinger rate in spatially varying and time varying electromagnetic fields. We also recall the pioneering work of Landau and Lifshitz, and Racah on the collision of charged particles as well as the experimental success of AdA and ADONE in the production of electron–positron pairs. We then turn to the possible experimental verification of these phenomena. We review: (A) the experimental verification of the e+e−→2γe+e−→2γ process studied by Dirac. We also briefly recall the very successful experiments of e+e−e+e− annihilation to hadronic channels, in addition to the Dirac electromagnetic channel; (B) ongoing Earth-based experiments to detect electron–positron production in strong fields by focusing coherent laser beams and by electron-beam–laser collisions; and (C) the multiyear attempts to detect electron–positron production in Coulomb fields for a large atomic number Z>137Z>137 in heavy-ion collisions. These attempts follow the classical theoretical work of Popov and Zeldovich, and Greiner and their schools. We then turn to astrophysics. We first review the basic work on the energetics and electrodynamical properties of an electromagnetic black hole and the application of the Schwinger formula around Kerr–Newman black holes as pioneered by Damour and Ruffini. We only focus on black hole masses larger than the critical mass of neutron stars, for convenience assumed to coincide with the Rhoades and Ruffini upper limit of 3.2 M⊙M⊙. In this case the electron Compton wavelength is much smaller than the space–time curvature and all previous results invariantly expressed can be applied following well established rules of the equivalence principle. We derive the corresponding rate of electron–positron pair production and introduce the concept of dyadosphere. We review the recent progress in describing the evolution of optically thick electron–positron plasma in the presence of supercritical electric field, which is relevant both in astrophysics as well as in ongoing laser beam experiments. In particular we review the recent progress based on the Vlasov–Boltzmann–Maxwell equations to study the feedback of the created electron–positron pairs on the original constant electric field. We evidence the existence of plasma oscillations and its interaction with photons leading to energy and number equipartition of photons, electrons and positrons. We finally review the recent progress obtained by using the Boltzmann equations to study the evolution of an electron–positron–photon plasma towards thermal equilibrium and determination of its characteristic timescales. The crucial difference introduced by the correct evaluation of the role of two- and three-body collisions, direct and inverse, is especially evidenced. We then present some general conclusions. The results reviewed in this report are going to be submitted to decisive tests in the forthcoming years both in physics and astrophysics. To mention only a few of the fundamental steps in testing in physics we recall, the setting up of experimental facilities at the National Ignition Facility at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory as well as the corresponding French Laser Mega Joule project. In astrophysics these results will be tested in galactic and extragalactic black holes observed in binary X-ray sources, active galactic nuclei, microquasars and in the process of gravitational collapse to a neutron star and also of two neutron stars to a black hole giving rise to GRBs. The astrophysical description of the stellar precursors and the initial physical conditions leading to a gravitational collapse process will be the subject of a forthcoming report. As of today no theoretical description has yet been found to explain either the emission of the remnant for supernova or the formation of a charged black hole for GRBs. Important current progress toward the understanding of such phenomena as well as of the electrodynamical structure of neutron stars, the supernova explosion and the theories of GRBs will be discussed in the above mentioned forthcoming report. What is important to recall at this stage is only that both the supernovae and GRBs processes are among the most energetic and transient phenomena ever observed in the Universe: a supernova can attain an energy of ∼1054 ergs on a timescale of a few months and GRBs can have emission of up to ∼1054 ergs in a timescale as short as a few seconds. The central role of neutron stars in the description of supernovae, as well as of black holes and the electron–positron plasma, in the description of GRBs, pioneered by one of us (RR) in 1975, are widely recognized. Only the theoretical basis to address these topics are discussed in the present report.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes
Blandford, R. D., & Znajek, R. L. (1977) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 · Cited by 5,116
The quantum theory of the electron
Dirac, P. A. M. (1928) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rspa.1928.0023 · Cited by 3,657
Sauter, F. (1931) · Zeitschrift f�r Physik · doi:10.1007/bf01339461 · Cited by 1,121
Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger Separable Solutions of Einstein’s Equations
Carter, B. (1968) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf03399503 · Cited by 1,111
Die Reflexion von Elektronen an einem Potentialsprung nach der relativistischen Dynamik von Dirac
Klein, O. (1929) · Zeitschrift f�r Physik · doi:10.1007/bf01339716 · Cited by 1,080
Cited by
Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with fundamental quantum systems
Di Piazza, A., Müller, C., Hatsagortsyan, K. Z., & Keitel, C. H. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1177 · Cited by 1,725
The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
Poder, K., Tamburini, M., Sarri, G., Di Piazza, A., Kuschel, S., Baird, C. D., Behm, K., Bohlen, S., Cole, J. M., Corvan, D. J., et al. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031004 · Cited by 353
Charged particle motion and radiation in strong electromagnetic fields
Gonoskov, A., Blackburn, T. G., Marklund, M., & Bulanov, S. S. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.045001 · Cited by 336
Particle Self-Bunching in the Schwinger Effect in Spacetime-Dependent Electric Fields
Hebenstreit, F., Alkofer, R., & Gies, H. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.180403 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruffini, R., Vereshchagin, G., & Xue, S.-S.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 487
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 1-140
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015661378
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron–positron pairs in physics and astrophysics: From heavy nuclei to black holes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.10.004
- The paper
- Ruffini, R., Vereshchagin, G., & Xue, S.-S. (2010). Electron–positron pairs in physics and astrophysics: From heavy nuclei to black holes. Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.10.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.