Cited by 136Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir EffectQuantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Particle Self-Bunching in the Schwinger Effect in Spacetime-Dependent Electric Fields

Open access
Hebenstreit, F., Alkofer, R., Gies, H.·2011·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Nonperturbative electron-positron pair creation (the Schwinger effect) is studied based on the Dirac-Heisenberg-Wigner formalism in 1+1 dimensions. An ab initio calculation of the Schwinger effect in the presence of a simple space- and time-dependent electric field pulse is performed for the first time, allowing for the calculation of the time evolution of observable quantities such as the charge density, the particle number density or the total number of created particles. We predict a new self-bunching effect of charges in phase space due to the spatial and temporal structure of the pulse.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.107.180403

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A sufficiently strong electrostatic field leads to Schwinger pair production of electrons and positrons.

    “a sufficiently strong electrostatic field leads to Schwinger pair production of electrons and positrons”

    From Quantum kinetic theory of plasmas (2022) · cites this paper as Hebenstreit et al. 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. V. S. Popov, 1972, Sov. Phys. JETP, 34, 709
  2. N. B. Narozhnyi, 1970, Yad. Fiz., 11, 1072
  3. N. B. Narozhnyi, 1970, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys., 11, 596

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hebenstreit, F., Alkofer, R., & Gies, H.
Affiliations
University of Graz (AT)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2011-10-27
Volume
107
Issue
18
Pages
180403-180403
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2026329560
Cited by
136
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
Schwinger effect, electron-positron pair production, pulsed electric field, 1+1 dimensions, charge density, particle number density, phase space

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review