The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonperturbative theory of weak pre- and post-selected measurements
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This paper starts with a brief review of the topic of strong and weak pre- and post-selected (PPS) quantum measurements, as well as weak values, and afterwards presents original work. In particular, we develop a nonperturbative theory of weak PPS measurements of an arbitrary system with an arbitrary meter, for arbitrary initial states of the system and the meter. New and simple analytical formulas are obtained for the average and the distribution of the meter pointer variable. These formulas hold to all orders in the weak value. In the case of a mixed preselected state, in addition to the standard weak value, an associated weak value is required to describe weak PPS measurements. In the linear regime, the theory provides the generalized Aharonov–Albert–Vaidman formula. Moreover, we reveal two new regimes of weak PPS measurements: the strongly-nonlinear regime and the inverted region (the regime with a very large weak value), where the system-dependent contribution to the pointer deflection decreases with increasing the measurement strength. The optimal conditions for weak PPS measurements are obtained in the strongly-nonlinear regime, where the magnitude of the average pointer deflection is equal or close to the maximum. This maximum is independent of the measurement strength , being typically of the order of the pointer uncertainty. In the optimal regime, the small parameter of the theory is comparable to the overlap of the pre- and post-selected states. We show that the amplification coefficient in the weak PPS measurements is generally a product of two qualitatively different factors. The effects of the free system and meter Hamiltonians are discussed. We also estimate the size of the ensemble required for a measurement and identify optimal and efficient meters for weak measurements. Exact solutions are obtained for a certain class of the measured observables. These solutions are used for numerical calculations, the results of which agree with the theory. Moreover, the theory is extended to allow for a completely general post-selection measurement. We also discuss time-symmetry properties of PPS measurements of any strength and the relation between PPS and standard (not post-selected) measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880
Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369
Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states
Raussendorf, R., Browne, D. E., & Briegel, H. J. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.022312 · Cited by 1,655
Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits
You, J. Q., & Nori, F. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10122 · Cited by 1,311
Self-citationMeasurement-based quantum computation
Briegel, H. J., Browne, D. E., Dür, W., Raussendorf, R., & Van den Nest, M. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1157 · Cited by 1,090
Buluta, I., & Nori, F. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177838 · Cited by 876
Self-citationQuantum mechanical interaction-free measurements
Elitzur, A. C., & Vaidman, L. (1993) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00736012 · Cited by 673
Bliokh, K. Y., & Bliokh, Y. P. (2007) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.75.066609 · Cited by 224
Weak Measurements of Light Chirality with a Plasmonic Slit
Gorodetski, Y., Bliokh, K. Y., Stein, B., Genet, C., Shitrit, N., Kleiner, V., Hasman, E., & Ebbesen, T. W. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.013901 · Cited by 218
Observation of the in-plane spin separation of light
Qin, Y., Li, Y., Feng, X., Xiao, Y.-F., Yang, H., & Gong, Q. (2011) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.19.009636 · Cited by 102
Optical Telecom Networks as Weak Quantum Measurements with Postselection
Brunner, N., Acín, A., Collins, D., Gisin, N., & Scarani, V. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.180402 · Cited by 86
Cited by
Transverse and longitudinal angular momenta of light
Bliokh, K. Y., & Nori, F. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2015.06.003 · Cited by 954
Self-citationGoos–Hänchen and Imbert–Fedorov beam shifts: an overview
Bliokh, K. Y., & Aiello, A. (2013) · Journal of Optics · doi:10.1088/2040-8978/15/1/014001 · Cited by 639
Dual electromagnetism: helicity, spin, momentum and angular momentum
Bliokh, K. Y., Bekshaev, A. Y., & Nori, F. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033026 · Cited by 393
Self-citationQuantum feedback: Theory, experiments, and applications
Zhang, J., Liu, Y.-X., Wu, R.-B., Jacobs, K., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.02.003 · Cited by 272
Self-citationState tomography via weak measurements
Wu, S. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep01193 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Kofman, A. G., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 520
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 43-133
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072381571
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 13.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.