Cited by 86Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyOptical Network Technologies

Optical Telecom Networks as Weak Quantum Measurements with Postselection

Open access
Brunner, Nicolas, Acín, Antonio, Collins, Daniel, Gisin, Nicolas, Scarani, Valerio·2003·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We show that weak measurements with postselection, proposed in the context of the quantum theory of measurement, naturally appear in the everyday physics of fiber optics telecom networks through polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) and polarization-dependent losses (PDL). Specifically, the PMD leads to a time-resolved discrimination of polarization; the postselection is done in the most natural way: one postselects those photons that have not been lost because of the PDL. The quantum formalism is shown to simplify the calculation of optical networks in the telecom limit of weak PMD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.91.180402

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A dichroic optical element necessarily performs a kind of post-selective measurement [16].

    “Actually, it has been already noticed that a dichroic optical element necessarily performs a kind of post-selective measurement ͓16͔.”

    From Linear optics and quantum maps (2007) · cites this paper as [16]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Y. Aharonov, D. Albert, and L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988).
  2. The possibility of testing the theory of weak values with linear optics and polarization has been exploited in N.W. M. Ritchie, J. G. Story, and R. G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1107 (1991);
  3. D. Suter, Phys. Rev. A 51, 45 (1995).
  4. B. Huttner, C. Geiser, and N. Gisin, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 6, 317 (2000)
  5. P. Lu, L. Chen, and X. Y. Bao, J. Lightwave Technol. 19, 856 (2001).
  6. See any treatise on the polarization of light, e.g., S. Huard, Polarisation de la Lumie `re (Masson, Paris, 1994) [Polarization of Light (Wiley, New York, 1997)].
  7. B. Huttner et al., Phys. Rev. A 54, 3783 (1996).
  8. Y. Aharonov, P. G. Bergmann, and J. L. Lebowitz, Phys. Rev. 134, B1410 (1964).
  9. N. Gisin and A. Go, Am. J. Phys. 69, 264 (2001).
  10. Y. Aharonov, S. Massar, S. Popescu, J. Tollaksen, and L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 983 (1996).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brunner, N., Acín, A., Collins, D., Gisin, N., & Scarani, V.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2003-10-28
Volume
91
Issue
18
Pages
180402-180402
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2006917527
Cited by
86
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Network Technologies
Keywords
weak measurement, post-selection, polarization mode dispersion, polarization-dependent loss, optical fiber communication, quantum measurement theory, photon loss, polarization discrimination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review