The DOI matches its Crossref record; 154 of the 154 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers
Open accessAbstract
Abstract According to quantum theory the energy exchange between physical systems is quantized. As a direct consequence, measurement sensitivities are fundamentally limited by quantization noise, or just ‘quantum noise’ in short. Furthermore, Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle demands measurement back-action for some observables of a system if they are measured repeatedly. In both respects, squeezed states are of high interest since they show a ‘squeezed’ uncertainty, which can be used to improve the sensitivity of measurement devices beyond the usual quantum noise limits including those impacted by quantum back-action noise. Squeezed states of light can be produced with nonlinear optics, and a large variety of proof-of-principle experiments were performed in past decades. As an actual application, squeezed light has now been used for several years to improve the measurement sensitivity of GEO 600 – a laser interferometer built for the detection of gravitational waves. Given this success, squeezed light is likely to significantly contribute to the new field of gravitational-wave astronomy. This Review revisits the concept of squeezed states and two-mode squeezed states of light, with a focus on experimental observations. The distinct properties of squeezed states displayed in quadrature phase-space as well as in the photon number representation are described. The role of the light’s quantum noise in laser interferometers is summarized and the actual application of squeezed states in these measurement devices is reviewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 · Cited by 14,151
Self-citationOn the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
On the Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic Equilibrium
Wigner, E. (1932) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.40.749 · Cited by 9,283
Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field
Glauber, R. J. (1963) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.131.2766 · Cited by 6,797
Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369
Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector
Acernese, F., Agathos, M., Agatsuma, K., Aisa, D., Allemandou, N., Allocca, A., Amarni, J., Astone, P., Balestri, G., Ballardin, G., et al. (2015) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001 · Cited by 4,050
Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie
Einstein, A. (1916) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19163540702 · Cited by 3,468
Die gegenw�rtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik
Schr�dinger, E. (1935) · Die Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf01491891 · Cited by 3,392
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Aasi, J., Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T., Abernathy, M. R., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., et al. (2015) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001 · Cited by 3,356
Self-citation
Cited by
Plasmonic Biosensing: Focus Review
Mejía-Salazar, J. R., & Oliveira, O. N. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00359 · Cited by 544
Resonant metasurfaces for generating complex quantum states
Santiago-Cruz, T., Gennaro, S. D., Mitrofanov, O., Addamane, S., Reno, J., Brener, I., & Chekhova, M. V. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abq8684 · Cited by 326
Roadmap on quantum light spectroscopy
Mukamel, S., Freyberger, M., Schleich, W., Bellini, M., Zavatta, A., Leuchs, G., Silberhorn, C., Boyd, R. W., Sánchez-Soto, L. L., Stefanov, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ab69a8 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Schnabel, R.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 684
- Pages
- 1-51
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2588097305
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 154
- FWCI
- 22.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.04.001
- The paper
- Schnabel, R. (2017). Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers. Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.04.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.