Cited by 326Metamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Resonant metasurfaces for generating complex quantum states

Open access
Santiago-Cruz, Tomás, Gennaro, Sylvain D., Mitrofanov, Oleg, Addamane, Sadhvikas, Reno, John, Brener, Igal, Chekhova, Maria V.·2022·Science

Abstract

Quantum state engineering, the cornerstone of quantum photonic technologies, mainly relies on spontaneous parametric downconversion and four-wave mixing, where one or two pump photons spontaneously decay into a photon pair. Both of these nonlinear effects require momentum conservation for the participating photons, which strongly limits the versatility of the resulting quantum states. Nonlinear metasurfaces have subwavelength thickness and allow the relaxation of this constraint; when combined with resonances, they greatly expand the possibilities of quantum state engineering. Here, we generated entangled photons via spontaneous parametric downconversion in semiconductor metasurfaces with high–quality factor, quasi-bound state in the continuum resonances. By enhancing the quantum vacuum field, our metasurfaces boost the emission of nondegenerate entangled photons within multiple narrow resonance bands and over a wide spectral range. A single resonance or several resonances in the same sample, pumped at multiple wavelengths, can generate multifrequency quantum states, including cluster states. These features reveal metasurfaces as versatile sources of complex states for quantum information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abq8684

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All-dielectric metasurfaces exhibit much lower loss and higher damage thresholds compared to plasmonic counterparts.

    “all-dielectric metasurfaces exhibit much lower loss and higher damage thresholds”

    From Inverse Design of an All-Dielectric Nonlinear Polaritonic Metasurface. (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

    The passage on GaAs metasurface fabrication and material choice (Affiliations, p. 3) discusses nonlinear susceptibility, not loss or damage thresholds. Searches for “damage threshold” and for dielectric–plasmonic loss comparisons found no passage in our copy addressing either comparison. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [2]2. M. Chekhova, in Progress in Optics (Elsevier, 2011), vol. 56 of Progress in Optics , pp. 187-226.
  2. [4]4. G. Vallone, E. Pomarico, P. Mataloni, F. De Martini, V. Berardi, Realization and characterization of a two-photon four-qubit linear cluster state. Physical Review Letters . 98 , 1-4 (2007).
  3. [6]6. N. C. Menicucci, S. T. Flammia, O. Pfister, One-Way Quantum Computing in the Optical Frequency Comb. Physical Review Letters . 101 , 130501 (2008).
  4. [9]9. M. Shcherbakov, S. Liu, I. Brener, A. Fedyanin, in Dielectric Metamaterials (Elsevier, 2020), pp. 223248.
  5. [11]11. T. Santiago-Cruz, A. Fedotova, V. Sultanov, M. A. Weissflog, D. Arslan, M. Younesi, T. Pertsch, I. Staude, F. Setzpfandt, M. Chekhova, Photon Pairs from Resonant Metasurfaces. Nano Letters . 21 , 4423-4429 (2021).
  6. [13]13. J. Ma, J. Zhang, M. Parry, M. Cai, R. C. Morales, L. Xu, D. N. Neshev, A. A. Sukhorukov, Generation of spatial photon entanglement from lithium niobate nonlocal metasurfaces (2022), (available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.01890). · arXiv
  7. [14]14. C. Okoth, A. Cavanna, T. Santiago-Cruz, M. V. Chekhova, Microscale Generation of Entangled Photons without Momentum Conservation. Physical Review Letters . 123 , 263602 (2019).
  8. [16]16. S. Liu, A. Vaskin, S. Addamane, B. Leung, M. C. Tsai, Y. Yang, P. P. Vabishchevich, G. A. Keeler, G. Wang, X. He, Y. Kim, N. F. Hartmann, H. Htoon, S. K. Doorn, M. Zilk, T. Pertsch, G. Balakrishnan, M. B. Sinclair, I. Staude, I. Brener, Light-Emitting Metasurfaces: Simultaneous Control of Spontaneous Emission and Far-Field Radiation. Nano Letters . 18 , 6906-6914 (2018).
  9. [19]19. A. C. Overvig, S. C. Malek, M. J. Carter, S. Shrestha, N. Yu, Selection rules for quasibound states in the continuum. Physical Review B . 102 , 1-28 (2020).
  10. [20]20. K. Koshelev, S. Lepeshov, M. Liu, A. Bogdanov, Y. Kivshar, Asymmetric Metasurfaces with High-Q Resonances Governed by Bound States in the Continuum. Physical Review Letters . 121 , 193903 (2018).
  11. [22]22. K. Koshelev, S. Lepeshov, M. Liu, A. Bogdanov, Y. Kivshar, Asymmetric Metasurfaces with High- Q Resonances Governed by Bound States in the Continuum. Physical Review Letters . 121 , 193903 (2018).
  12. [24]24. T. Santiago-Cruz, V. Sultanov, H. Zhang, L. A. Krivitsky, M. V. Chekhova, Entangled photons from subwavelength nonlinear films. Optics Letters . 46 , 653 (2021).
  13. [25]25. C. Okoth, E. Kovlakov, F. Bönsel, A. Cavanna, S. Straupe, S. P. Kulik, M. v. Chekhova, Idealized EinsteinPodolsky-Rosen states from non-phase-matched parametric down-conversion. Physical Review A . 101 , 011801 (2020).
  14. [30]30. D. F. Walls, G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santiago-Cruz, T., Gennaro, S. D., Mitrofanov, O., Addamane, S., Reno, J., Brener, I., & Chekhova, M. V.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
  • Sandia National Laboratories (US)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Brener, Igal
  • Chekhova, Maria V.
Venue
Science
Published
2022-08-26
Volume
377
Issue
6609
Pages
991-995
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4293242954
Cited by
326
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 6
FWCI
14.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
resonant metasurfaces, quantum state engineering, spontaneous parametric down-conversion, entangled photons, semiconductor metasurfaces, quasi-bound states in the continuum, cluster states, nonlinear optics, momentum conservation
MeSH terms
Photons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review