The DOI matches its Crossref record; 166 of the 166 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We review how the muon anomalous magnetic moment ( g − 2 ) and the quest for lepton flavor violation are intimately correlated. Indeed the decay μ → e γ is induced by the same amplitude for different choices of in- and outgoing leptons. In this work, we try to address some intriguing questions such as: Which hierarchy in the charged lepton sector one should have in order to reconcile possible signals coming simultaneously from g − 2 and lepton flavor violation? What can we learn if the g − 2 anomaly is confirmed by the upcoming flagship experiments at FERMILAB and J-PARC, and no signal is seen in the decay μ → e γ in the foreseeable future? On the other hand, if the μ → e γ decay is seen in the upcoming years, do we need to necessarily observe a signal also in g − 2 ? . In this attempt, we generally study the correlation between these observables in a detailed analysis of simplified models. We derive master integrals and fully analytical and exact expressions for both phenomena, and address other flavor violating signals. We investigate under which conditions the observations can be made compatible and discuss their implications. Lastly, we discuss in this context several extensions of the SM, such as the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, Left–Right symmetric model, B – L model, scotogenic model, two Higgs doublet model, Zee–Babu model, 331 model, and L μ − L τ , dark photon, seesaw models type I, II and III, and also address the interplay with μ → e e e decay and μ – e conversion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agostinelli, S., Allison, J., Amako, K., Apostolakis, J., Araujo, H., Arce, P., Asai, M., Axen, D., Banerjee, S., Barrand, G., et al. (2003) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment · doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 · Cited by 25,106
Alwall, J., Frederix, R., Frixione, S., Hirschi, V., Maltoni, F., Mattelaer, O., Shao, H.-S., Stelzer, T., Torrielli, P., & Zaro, M. (2014) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 · Cited by 7,579
Olive, K. A. (2016) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/10/100001 · Cited by 7,334
CPConservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles
Peccei, R. D., & Quinn, H. R. (1977) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.1440 · Cited by 7,026
Olive, K. A. (2014) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/38/9/090001 · Cited by 6,897
Eidelman, S., Hayes, K. G., Olive, K. A., Aguilar-Benitez, M., Amsler, C., Asner, D., Babu, K. S., Barnett, R. M., Beringer, J., Burchat, P. R., et al. (2004) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.06.001 · Cited by 6,673
Beringer, J., Arguin, J. F., Barnett, R. M., Copic, K., Dahl, O., Groom, D. E., Lin, C. J., Lys, J., Murayama, H., Wohl, C. G., et al. (2012) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.010001 · Cited by 5,978
Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation
Mohapatra, R. N., & Senjanović, G. (1980) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.44.912 · Cited by 5,851
Evidence for Oscillation of Atmospheric Neutrinos
Fukuda, Y., Hayakawa, T., Ichihara, E., Inoue, K., Ishihara, K., Ishino, H., Itow, Y., Kajita, T., Kameda, J., Kasuga, S., et al. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.1562 · Cited by 5,067
Amsler, C., Doser, M., Antonelli, M., Asner, D. M., Babu, K. S., Baer, H., Band, H. R., Barnett, R. M., Bergren, E., Beringer, J., et al. (2008) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018 · Cited by 5,065
Cited by
From the Trees to the Forest: A Review of Radiative Neutrino Mass Models
Cai, Y., Herrero García, J., Schmidt, M. A., Vicente, A., & Volkas, R. R. (2017) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2017.00063 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindner, M., Platscher, M., & Queiroz, F. S.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 731
- Pages
- 1-82
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2543917711
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 166
- FWCI
- 38.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.001
- The paper
- Lindner, M., Platscher, M., & Queiroz, F. S. (2018). A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation. Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
