The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The structure of the proton in the LHC precision era
Open accessAbstract
We review recent progress in the determination of the parton distribution functions (PDFs) of the proton, with emphasis on the applications for precision phenomenology at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). First of all, we introduce the general theoretical framework underlying the global QCD analysis of the quark and gluon internal structure of protons. We then present a detailed overview of the hard-scattering measurements, and the corresponding theory predictions, that are used in state-of-the-art PDF fits. We emphasize here the role that higher-order QCD and electroweak corrections play in the description of recent high-precision collider data. We present the methodology used to extract PDFs in global analyses, including the PDF parametrization strategy and the definition and propagation of PDF uncertainties. Then we review and compare the most recent releases from the various PDF fitting collaborations, highlighting their differences and similarities. We discuss the role that QED corrections and photon-initiated contributions play in modern PDF analysis. We provide representative examples of the implications of PDF fits for high-precision LHC phenomenological applications, such as Higgs coupling measurements and searches for high-mass New Physics resonances. We conclude this report by discussing some selected topics relevant for the future of PDF determinations, including the treatment of theoretical uncertainties, the connection with lattice QCD calculations, and the role of PDFs at future high-energy colliders beyond the LHC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3370 · Cited by 9,227
Cited by
Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider
Abdul Khalek, R., Accardi, A., Adam, J., Adamiak, D., Akers, W., Albaladejo, M., Al-bataineh, A., Alexeev, M. G., Ameli, F., Antonioli, P., et al. (2022) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447 · Cited by 913
Self-citationThe standard model as an effective field theory
Brivio, I., & Trott, M. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.002 · Cited by 559
The path to proton structure at 1% accuracy: NNPDF Collaboration
Ball, R. D., Carrazza, S., Cruz-Martinez, J., Del Debbio, L., Forte, S., Giani, T., Iranipour, S., Kassabov, Z., Latorre, J. I., Nocera, E. R., et al. (2022) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10328-7 · Cited by 448
Self-citationThe Large Hadron–Electron Collider at the HL-LHC
Agostini, P., Aksakal, H., Alekhin, S., Allport, P. P., Andari, N., Andre, K. D. J., Angal-Kalinin, D., Antusch, S., Aperio Bella, L., Apolinario, L., et al. (2021) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abf3ba · Cited by 253
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, J., Harland-Lang, L., & Rojo, J.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 742
- Pages
- 1-121
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2754896790
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.