Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9–targeted mutagenesis: An opportunity for yield improvements of crop plants grown under environmental stresses
Abstract
Developing more crops able to sustainably produce high yields when grown under biotic/abiotic stresses is an important goal, if crop production and food security are to be guaranteed in the face of ever-increasing human population and unpredictable global climatic conditions. However, conventional crop improvement, through random mutagenesis or genetic recombination, is time-consuming and cannot keep pace with increasing food demands. Targeted genome editing (GE) technologies, especially clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/(CRISPR)-associated protein 9 (Cas9), have great potential to aid in the breeding of crops that are able to produce high yields under conditions of biotic/abiotic stress. This is due to their high efficiency, accuracy and low risk of off-target effects, compared with conventional random mutagenesis methods. The use of CRISPR/Cas9 system has grown very rapidly in recent years with numerous examples of targeted mutagenesis in crop plants, including gene knockouts, modifications, and the activation and repression of target genes. The potential of the GE approach for crop improvement has been clearly demonstrated. However, the regulation and social acceptance of GE crops still remain a challenge. In this review, we evaluate the recent applications of the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated GE, as a means to produce crop plants with greater resilience to the stressors they encounter when grown under increasing stressful environmental conditions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CRISPR/Cas9 system is emerging as most powerful GE strategy because it is economical, rapid, accurate, and enables multiple site specific editing within genome.
“In contrast to the ZENs and TALENs genome editing tools, the CRISPR/Cas9 system is emerging as the most powerful GE strategy because it is economical, rapid, accurate, and enables multiple site specific editing within the genome [234].”
From Impact of Climate Change on Crops Adaptation and Strategies to Tackle Its Outcome: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [234]
CRISPR/Cas9 has great potential to aid crop breeding to establish high yielding and stress-resistant varieties.
“Moreover, it has great potential to aid crop breeding to establish high yielding and stress-resistant varieties [234].”
From Impact of Climate Change on Crops Adaptation and Strategies to Tackle Its Outcome: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [234]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Abdelrahman, M., Al-Sadi, A. M., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Burritt, D. J., & Tran, L.-S. P.
- Affiliations
- Tohoku University (JP)
- Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Ton Duc Thang University (VN)
- Corresponding author
- Tran, Lam-Son Phan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 131
- Pages
- 31-36
- ISSN
- 0981-9428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2793591200
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Plant Physiology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
- Keywords
- CRISPR/Cas9, genome editing, targeted mutagenesis, crop improvement, crop yield, abiotic stress, biotic stress, stress tolerance, gene knockout, gene activation and repression, off-target effects, food security
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, Plant Diseases, Stress, Physiological, Gene Targeting, Crops, Agricultural, Plants, Genetically Modified, Disease Resistance, CRISPR-Cas Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review