Cited by 103CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchPlant Genetic and Mutation Studies

Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9–targeted mutagenesis: An opportunity for yield improvements of crop plants grown under environmental stresses

Abdelrahman, Mostafa, Al-Sadi, Abdullah M., Pour-Aboughadareh, Alireza, Burritt, David J., Tran, Lam-Son Phan·2018·Plant Physiology and Biochemistry

Abstract

Developing more crops able to sustainably produce high yields when grown under biotic/abiotic stresses is an important goal, if crop production and food security are to be guaranteed in the face of ever-increasing human population and unpredictable global climatic conditions. However, conventional crop improvement, through random mutagenesis or genetic recombination, is time-consuming and cannot keep pace with increasing food demands. Targeted genome editing (GE) technologies, especially clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/(CRISPR)-associated protein 9 (Cas9), have great potential to aid in the breeding of crops that are able to produce high yields under conditions of biotic/abiotic stress. This is due to their high efficiency, accuracy and low risk of off-target effects, compared with conventional random mutagenesis methods. The use of CRISPR/Cas9 system has grown very rapidly in recent years with numerous examples of targeted mutagenesis in crop plants, including gene knockouts, modifications, and the activation and repression of target genes. The potential of the GE approach for crop improvement has been clearly demonstrated. However, the regulation and social acceptance of GE crops still remain a challenge. In this review, we evaluate the recent applications of the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated GE, as a means to produce crop plants with greater resilience to the stressors they encounter when grown under increasing stressful environmental conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CRISPR/Cas9 system is emerging as most powerful GE strategy because it is economical, rapid, accurate, and enables multiple site specific editing within genome.

    “In contrast to the ZENs and TALENs genome editing tools, the CRISPR/Cas9 system is emerging as the most powerful GE strategy because it is economical, rapid, accurate, and enables multiple site specific editing within the genome [234].”
  • CRISPR/Cas9 has great potential to aid crop breeding to establish high yielding and stress-resistant varieties.

    “Moreover, it has great potential to aid crop breeding to establish high yielding and stress-resistant varieties [234].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 103

Authors
Abdelrahman, M., Al-Sadi, A. M., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Burritt, D. J., & Tran, L.-S. P.
Affiliations
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Ton Duc Thang University (VN)
Corresponding author
Tran, Lam-Son Phan
Venue
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
131
Pages
31-36
ISSN
0981-9428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793591200
Cited by
103
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plant Physiology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, genome editing, targeted mutagenesis, crop improvement, crop yield, abiotic stress, biotic stress, stress tolerance, gene knockout, gene activation and repression, off-target effects, food security
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Plant Diseases, Stress, Physiological, Gene Targeting, Crops, Agricultural, Plants, Genetically Modified, Disease Resistance, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review