The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neprosin belongs to a new family of glutamic peptidase based on in silico evidence
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Neprosin was first discovered in the insectivorous tropical pitcher plants of Nepenthes species as a novel protease with prolyl endopeptidase (PEP) activity. Neprosin has two uncharacterized domains of neprosin activation peptide and neprosin. A previous study has shown neprosin activity in hydrolyzing proline-rich gliadin, a gluten component that triggers celiac disease. In this study, we performed in silico structure-function analysis to investigate the catalytic mechanism of neprosin. Neprosin sequences lack the catalytic triad and motifs of PEP family S9. Protein structures of neprosins from Nepenthes × ventrata (NvNpr) and N. rafflesiana (NrNpr1) were generated by ab initio methods and comparatively assessed to obtain high-quality models. Structural alignment of models to experimental structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) found a high structural similarity to glutamic peptidases. Further investigations reveal other resemblances to the glutamic peptidases with low optimum pH that activates the enzyme via autoproteolysis for maturation. Two highly conserved glutamic acid residues, which are stable according to the molecular dynamics simulation, can be found at the active site of the substrate cleft. Protein docking demonstrated that mature neprosins bind well with potent antigen αI-gliadin at the putative active site. Taken together, neprosins represent a new glutamic peptidase family, with a putative catalytic dyad of two glutamic acids. This study illustrates a hypothetical enzymatic mechanism of the neprosin family and demonstrates the useful application of an accurate ab initio protein structure prediction in the structure-function study of a novel protein family.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
MolProbity : all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography
Chen, V. B., Arendall, W. B., Headd, J. J., Keedy, D. A., Immormino, R. M., Kapral, G. J., Murray, L. W., Richardson, J. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444909042073 · Cited by 14,115
SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes
Waterhouse, A., Bertoni, M., Bienert, S., Studer, G., Tauriello, G., Gumienny, R., Heer, F. T., de Beer, T. A. P., Rempfer, C., Bordoli, L., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky427 · Cited by 13,067
UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers
Pettersen, E. F., Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Meng, E. C., Couch, G. S., Croll, T. I., Morris, J. H., & Ferrin, T. E. (2021) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3943 · Cited by 9,514
ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all
Mirdita, M., Schütze, K., Moriwaki, Y., Heo, L., Ovchinnikov, S., & Steinegger, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · Cited by 9,391
Pfam: The protein families database in 2021
Mistry, J., Chuguransky, S., Williams, L., Qureshi, M., Salazar, G. A., Sonnhammer, E. L. L., Tosatto, S. C. E., Paladin, L., Raj, S., Richardson, L. J., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · Cited by 7,452
Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track network
Baek, M., DiMaio, F., Anishchenko, I., Dauparas, J., Ovchinnikov, S., Lee, G. R., Wang, J., Cong, Q., Kinch, L. N., Schaeffer, R. D., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.14.448402 · Cited by 5,549
The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019
Madeira, F., Park, Y. M., Lee, J., Buso, N., Gur, T., Madhusoodanan, N., Basutkar, P., Tivey, A. R. N., Potter, S. C., Finn, R. D., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz268 · Cited by 4,167
Ashkenazy, H., Abadi, S., Martz, E., Chay, O., Mayrose, I., Pupko, T., & Ben-Tal, N. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw408 · Cited by 3,163
PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking
Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Inbar, Y., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki481 · Cited by 3,018
Cited by
The Complex World of Emaraviruses—Challenges, Insights, and Prospects
(2022) · doi:10.3390/f13111868 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Ting, T.-Y., Baharin, A., Ramzi, A. B., Ng, C.-L., & Goh, H.-H.
- Affiliations
- National University of Malaysia (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Goh, Hoe-Han
- Venue
- Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 183
- Pages
- 23-35
- ISSN
- 0981-9428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4225261257
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Plant Physiology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (DIP-2020-005)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
- Keywords
- prolyl endopeptidase, Nepenthes, pitcher plants, celiac disease, catalytic dyad, glutamate residues, autoproteolysis, ab initio protein structure prediction, structure-function analysis, enzyme mechanism
- MeSH terms
- Gliadin, Peptide Hydrolases, Peptides, Catalytic Domain, Proteolysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
