CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of transformational and transactional leadership on agile project success

Ansari, Mohammad Sultan Ahmad, Abouraia, Mahmoud, El Morsy, Rania, Thumiki, Venkat Ram Raj·2024·Project Leadership and Society
DOI 10.1016/j.plas.2024.100136
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of Transformational and Transactional Leadership contribution in project accomplishment. It specifically evaluates the mediating role of Leadership for Agile project methodology. The data was collected from cross-sectional professionals such as Information Technology project Managers of various fields, Civil and Construction, Pharmaceuticals, Telecommunication, Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) in Oman that comprised 384 valid samples. We used conformity factor analysis for reliability and validity of our measurement and it was valid and reliable. Partial Least-Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to analyze the theoretical framework. The results confirmed leadership enhances agile project methodology through the project excellence, improves end user satisfaction, value addition by achieving triple constraints. It was observed that leadership improves project performance in which team building, management commitment, unobstructed vision, daily standup meeting eases the influence of leadership on Agile methodologies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.plas.2024.100136

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Ahmad, 2022, Impact of the project manager's transformational leadership, influenced by mediation of self-leadership and moderation of empowerment, on project success, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 15, 842, 10.1108/IJMPB-03-2021-0066 · DOI
  2. Almeida, 2021, Management of non-technological projects by embracing agile methodologies, Int. J. Proj. Organisat. Manag., 13, 135, 10.1504/IJPOM.2021.116261 · DOI
  3. Ansari, 2020, Extended service profit chain in telecom service industry in Oman–An empirical validation, Sustainable Futures, 2, 10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100032 · DOI
  4. Ansari, 2021, An innovative approach of integrating service quality, employee loyalty and profitability with service profit chain in telecom service industry: an empirical validation, Proceedings on Engineering, 3, 1
  5. Ansari, 2022, Lean six Sigma in healthcare: some sobering thoughts on implementation, Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, 4, 457, 10.24874/PES04.04.007 · DOI
  6. Badakhshan, 2019, Agile business process management: a systematic literature review and an integrated framework, Bus. Process Manag. J., 26, 1505, 10.1108/BPMJ-12-2018-0347 · DOI
  7. Breese, 2020, The project sponsor role and benefits realization: more than ‘just doing the day job, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 38, 17, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.09.009 · DOI
  8. Caccamese, 2012, Infant Ment. Health J., 44, 240
  9. Cervone, 2011, Understanding agile project management methods using Scrum, OCLC Syst. Serv.: International digital library perspectives, 27, 18, 10.1108/10650751111106528 · DOI
  10. Ciric Lalic, 2022, How does a project management approach impact project success? From traditional to agile, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 15, 494, 10.1108/IJMPB-04-2021-0108 · DOI
  11. Cooper, 2018, Agile–stage-gate for manufacturers: changing the way new products are developed integrating agile project management methods into a stage-gate system offers both opportunities and challenges, Res. Technol. Manag., 61, 17, 10.1080/08956308.2018.1421380 · DOI
  12. Fanousse, 2021, Reducing uncertainties in innovation projects through intra-organizational collaboration: a systematic literature review, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 14, 1335, 10.1108/IJMPB-11-2020-0347 · DOI
  13. Fareed, 2022, Transformational leadership and project success: the mediating role of trust and job satisfaction, Front. Psychol., 13, 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954052 · DOI
  14. Fernandez, 2022, Integration networks in IT-enabled transformation programs, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 15, 913, 10.1108/IJMPB-07-2021-0183 · DOI
  15. Grewal, 2023, Assessing adolescents' readiness for action and attitudes toward obesity prevention: instrument development and psychometric properties, Obes. Rev., 24, 10.1111/obr.13533 · DOI
  16. Huang, 2021, Using PLS-SEM model to explore the influencing factors of learning satisfaction in blended learning, Educ. Sci., 11, 249, 10.3390/educsci11050249 · DOI
  17. Josyula, 2023, How to make intelligent automation projects agile? Identification of success factors and an assessment approach, Int. J. Organ. Anal., 31, 1461, 10.1108/IJOA-05-2021-2749 · DOI
  18. Khan, 2022, Despotic leadership and IT project efficiency: the role of resilience, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 15, 449, 10.1108/IJMPB-01-2021-0019 · DOI
  19. Kudyba, 2023, Understanding project success involving analytic-based decision support in the digital era: a focus on IC and agile project management, J. Intellect. Cap., 24, 1429, 10.1108/JIC-03-2022-0054 · DOI
  20. Kumar, 2023, Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: project practitioners’ perspectives, Organ. Technol. Manag. Construct. Int. J., 15, 1
  21. Lechien, 2023, Validity and reliability of an instrument evaluating the performance of intelligent chatbot: the Artificial Intelligence Performance Instrument (AIPI), Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol., 1
  22. Leong, 2023, Hybrid project management between traditional software development lifecycle and agile based product development for future sustainability, Sustainability, 15, 1121, 10.3390/su15021121 · DOI
  23. Marques, 2023, Effectiveness analysis of waterfall and agile project management methodologies–a case study from Macau's construction industry, Revista Gestão em Análise, 12, 23, 10.12662/2359-618xregea.v12i1.p23-38.2023 · DOI
  24. Mishra, 2023, Re-examining post-acceptance model of information systems continuance: a revised theoretical model using MASEM approach, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 68, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102571 · DOI
  25. Muhammad, 2021, Impact of agile management on project performance: evidence from IT sector of Pakistan, PLoS One, 16, 10.1371/journal.pone.0249311 · DOI
  26. Nauman, 2022, Enhancing the impact of transformational leadership and team building on project success: the moderating role of empowerment climate, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 15, 423, 10.1108/IJMPB-02-2021-0031 · DOI
  27. Raharjo, 2023, A model of critical success factors for agile information technology project in Indonesia using analytic hierarchy process (AHP), ADI Journal on Recent Innovation, 5, 68
  28. Rasool, 2021, What a toxic workplace environment affects employee engagement: the mediating role of organizational support and employee wellbeing, Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health, 18, 2294, 10.3390/ijerph18052294 · DOI
  29. Rönkkö, 2013, A critical examination of common beliefs about partial least squares path modeling, Organ. Res. Methods, 16, 425, 10.1177/1094428112474693 · DOI
  30. Sagar, 2022, Challenges negating virtual construction project team performance in the Middle East, Built. Environ. Proj. Asset. Manag., 12, 613, 10.1108/BEPAM-08-2021-0104 · DOI
  31. Tabachnick, 2013, vol. 6, 497
  32. Walker, 2022, Improved reliability in planning large-scale infrastructure project delivery through Alliancing, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 15, 721, 10.1108/IJMPB-02-2022-0035 · DOI
  33. Zaman, 2020, Effect of readiness to change and effectiveness of transformational leadership on workers' performance during covid-19 pandemic, Solid State Technol., 63, 185
  34. Zaman, 2022, Feeling “holier than thou”: exploring the critical nexus between project governance, exploitative leadership, and multi-dimensional success in ICT projects, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 15, 816, 10.1108/IJMPB-11-2021-0294 · DOI
  35. Zaman, 2019, Linking transformational leadership and “multi-dimensions” of project success: moderating effects of project flexibility and project visibility using PLS-SEM, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 13, 103, 10.1108/IJMPB-10-2018-0210 · DOI
  36. Zhang, 2023, The impact of project manager's emotional intelligence on project performance: a meta-analysis, Chin. Manag. Stud., 17, 461, 10.1108/CMS-05-2021-0195 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Ansari, M. S. A., Abouraia, M., El Morsy, R., & Thumiki, V. R. R.
ORCID
Ansari, Mohammad Sultan Ahmad
Venue
Project Leadership and Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
5
Pages
100136
ISSN
2666-7215
DOI
10.1016/j.plas.2024.100136
Cited by
28
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review