SSR identification and phylogenetic analysis in four plant species based on complete chloroplast genome sequences
Abstract
The effective utilization of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been challenged by the difficulty to accurately distinguish between similar plant varieties. The stability and conservation of the chloroplast genome can aid in resolving genotypes. Previous studies using nuclear sequences and molecular markers have not effectively differentiated the species from related taxa, such as Machilus leptophylla, Hanceola exserta, Rubus bambusarum, and Rubus henryi. This study aimed to characterize the chloroplast genomes of these four plant species, and analyze their simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and phylogenetic positions. The results demonstrated the four chloroplast genomes consisted of 152.624 kb, 153.296 kb, 156.309 kb, and 158.953 kb in length, involving 124, 130, 129, and 131 genes, respectively. They also contained four specific regions with mononucleotide being the class with the most members. Moreover, these repeating types of SSR were various in individual class. Phylogenetic analysis showed that M. leptophylla was clustered with M. yunnanensis, and H. exserta was confirmed as belonging to the family Ocimeae. Additionally, R. bambusarum and R. henryi were grouped together but differed in their SSR features, indicating that they were not the same species. This research provides evidence for resolving species and contributes new genetic information for further studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SSRs targeting chloroplast microsatellites have been successful for cultivar authentication.
“Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) targeting chloroplast microsatellites have been successful for cultivar authentication [83].”
From Genetic Insights into the Economic Toll of Cell Line Misidentification: A Comprehensive Review (2026) · cites this paper as [83]
Cites
Identification of drugs that interact with herbs in drug development
Zhou, S.-F., Zhou, Z.-W., Li, C.-G., Chen, X., Yu, X., Xue, C. C., & Herington, A. (2007) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2007.06.004 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genetic Insights into the Economic Toll of Cell Line Misidentification: A Comprehensive Review
Weiskirchen, R. (2026) · Medical Sciences · doi:10.3390/medsci14010025 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhu, Y., Zhang, X., Yan, S., Feng, C., Wang, D., Yang, W., Daud, M. K., Xiang, J., & Mei, L.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- ZheJiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
- Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Yangtze University (CN)
- Kohat University of Science and Technology (PK)
- Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Mei, Lei
- Venue
- Plasmid
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 125
- Pages
- 102670
- ISSN
- 0147-619X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4321486759
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Plasmid (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies
- Keywords
- chloroplast genome, microsatellite markers, phylogenetic analysis, species delimitation, mononucleotide repeats, traditional Chinese medicine plants
- MeSH terms
- Phylogeny, Plasmids, Genome, Chloroplast
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review