Cited by 24Plant Diversity and EvolutionChromosomal and Genetic VariationsPlant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies

SSR identification and phylogenetic analysis in four plant species based on complete chloroplast genome sequences

Zhu, Yueyi, Zhang, Xianwen, Yan, Shufeng, Feng, Chen, Wang, Dongfang, Yang, Wei, Daud, Muhammad Khan, Xiang, Jiqian +1 more·2023·Plasmid

Abstract

The effective utilization of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been challenged by the difficulty to accurately distinguish between similar plant varieties. The stability and conservation of the chloroplast genome can aid in resolving genotypes. Previous studies using nuclear sequences and molecular markers have not effectively differentiated the species from related taxa, such as Machilus leptophylla, Hanceola exserta, Rubus bambusarum, and Rubus henryi. This study aimed to characterize the chloroplast genomes of these four plant species, and analyze their simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and phylogenetic positions. The results demonstrated the four chloroplast genomes consisted of 152.624 kb, 153.296 kb, 156.309 kb, and 158.953 kb in length, involving 124, 130, 129, and 131 genes, respectively. They also contained four specific regions with mononucleotide being the class with the most members. Moreover, these repeating types of SSR were various in individual class. Phylogenetic analysis showed that M. leptophylla was clustered with M. yunnanensis, and H. exserta was confirmed as belonging to the family Ocimeae. Additionally, R. bambusarum and R. henryi were grouped together but differed in their SSR features, indicating that they were not the same species. This research provides evidence for resolving species and contributes new genetic information for further studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.plasmid.2023.102670

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Zhu, Y., Zhang, X., Yan, S., Feng, C., Wang, D., Yang, W., Daud, M. K., Xiang, J., & Mei, L.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • ZheJiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
  • Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Yangtze University (CN)
  • Kohat University of Science and Technology (PK)
  • Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Mei, Lei
Venue
Plasmid
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
125
Pages
102670
ISSN
0147-619X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321486759
Cited by
24
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plasmid (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies
Keywords
chloroplast genome, microsatellite markers, phylogenetic analysis, species delimitation, mononucleotide repeats, traditional Chinese medicine plants
MeSH terms
Phylogeny, Plasmids, Genome, Chloroplast

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review