The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D printing of Aluminium alloys: Additive Manufacturing of Aluminium alloys using selective laser melting
Open accessAbstract
Metal Additive Manufacturing (AM) processes, such as selective laser melting (SLM), enable the fabrication of arbitrary 3D-structures with unprecedented degrees of freedom. Research is rapidly progressing in this field, with promising results opening up a range of possible applications across both scientific and industrial sectors. Many sectors are now benefiting from fabricating complex structures using AM technologies to achieve the objectives of light-weighting, increased functionality, and part number reduction, among others. AM also lends potential in fulfilling demands for reducing the cost and design-to-manufacture time. Aluminium alloys are of the main material systems receiving attention in SLM research, being favoured in many high-value applications. However, processing them is challenging due to the difficulties associated with laser-melting aluminium where parts suffer various defects. A number of studies in recent years have developed approaches to remedy them and reported successful SLM of various Al-alloys and have gone on to explore its potential application in advanced componentry. This paper reports on recent advancements in this area and highlights some key topics requiring attention for further progression. It aims to develop a comprehensive understanding of the interrelation between the various aspects of the subject, as this is essential to demonstrate credibility for industrial needs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation
Jain, A., Ong, S. P., Hautier, G., Chen, W., Richards, W. D., Dacek, S., Cholia, S., Gunter, D., Skinner, D., Ceder, G., et al. (2013) · APL Materials · doi:10.1063/1.4812323 · Cited by 13,094
Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Frazier, W. E. (2014) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z · Cited by 5,984
Fatigue of AlSi10Mg specimens fabricated by additive manufacturing selective laser melting (AM-SLM)
Uzan, N. E., Shneck, R., Yeheskel, O., & Frage, N. (2017) · Materials Science and Engineering: A · doi:10.1016/j.msea.2017.08.027 · Cited by 302
Cited by
Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review
Blakey-Milner, B., Gradl, P., Snedden, G., Brooks, M., Pitot, J., Lopez, E., Leary, M., Berto, F., & du Plessis, A. (2021) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110008 · Cited by 2,263
Kafle, A., Luis, E., Silwal, R., Pan, H. M., Shrestha, P. L., & Bastola, A. K. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13183101 · Cited by 587
Al-Maharma, A. Y., Patil, S. P., & Markert, B. (2020) · Materials Research Express · doi:10.1088/2053-1591/abcc5d · Cited by 404
Mahmood, M. A., Chioibasu, D., Ur Rehman, A., Mihai, S., & Popescu, A. C. (2022) · Metals · doi:10.3390/met12010077 · Cited by 119
Shiyas, K. A., & Ramanujam, R. (2021) · Materials Today Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.016 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Aboulkhair, N. T., Simonelli, M., Parry, L., Ashcroft, I., Tuck, C., & Hague, R.
- Venue
- Progress in Materials Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 106
- Pages
- 100578
- ISSN
- 0079-6425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2960317155
- Cited by
- 1,552
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 86.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D printing of Aluminium alloys: Additive Manufacturing of Aluminium alloys using selective laser melting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100578
- The paper
- Aboulkhair, N. T., Simonelli, M., Parry, L., Ashcroft, I., Tuck, C., & Hague, R. (2019). 3D printing of Aluminium alloys: Additive Manufacturing of Aluminium alloys using selective laser melting. Progress in Materials Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.