The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revisiting fundamental welding concepts to improve additive manufacturing: From theory to practice
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Additive manufacturing technologies based on melting and solidification have considerable similarities with fusion-based welding technologies, either by electric arc or high-power beams. However, several concepts are being introduced in additive manufacturing which have been extensively used in multipass arc welding with filler material. Therefore, clarification of fundamental definitions is important to establish a common background between welding and additive manufacturing research communities. This paper aims to review these concepts, highlighting the distinctive characteristics of fusion welding that can be embraced by additive manufacturing, namely the nature of rapid thermal cycles associated to small size and localized heat sources, the non-equilibrium nature of rapid solidification and its effects on: internal defects formation, phase transformations, residual stresses and distortions. Concerning process optimization, distinct criteria are proposed based on geometric, energetic and thermal considerations, allowing to determine an upper bound limit for the optimum hatch distance during additive manufacturing. Finally, a unified equation to compute the energy density is proposed. This equation enables to compare works performed with distinct equipment and experimental conditions, covering the major process parameters: power, travel speed, heat source dimension, hatch distance, deposited layer thickness and material grain size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lee, W.-B., Bang, K.-S., & Jung, S.-B. (2005) · Journal of Alloys and Compounds · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.07.057 · Cited by 368
Cited by
About metastable cellular structure in additively manufactured austenitic stainless steels
Kong, D., Dong, C., Wei, S., Ni, X., Zhang, L., Li, R., Wang, L., Man, C., & Li, X. (2021) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101804 · Cited by 528
Review: The Impact of Metal Additive Manufacturing on the Aerospace Industry
Mohd Yusuf, S., Cutler, S., & Gao, N. (2019) · Metals · doi:10.3390/met9121286 · Cited by 332
Robotics and Additive Manufacturing in the Construction Industry
Tankova, T., & da Silva, L. S. (2020) · Current Robotics Reports · doi:10.1007/s43154-020-00003-8 · Cited by 29
Wire arc additive manufacturing of low alloyed steels, copper aluminum alloys, and their bimetals
Karamimoghadam, M., Aghayar, Y., Forooghi, F., Denora, V., Mohammadi, M., Contuzzi, N., & Casalino, G. (2025) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-025-16436-4 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliveira, J. P., Santos, T. G., & Miranda, R. M.
- Venue
- Progress in Materials Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 107
- Pages
- 100590
- ISSN
- 0079-6425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2966410959
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 45.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting fundamental welding concepts to improve additive manufacturing: From theory to practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100590
- The paper
- Oliveira, J. P., Santos, T. G., & Miranda, R. M. (2020). Revisiting fundamental welding concepts to improve additive manufacturing: From theory to practice. Progress in Materials Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100590
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.