The DOI matches its Crossref record.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Towards reliable binding energy referencing
Open accessAbstract
With more than 9000 papers published annually, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is an indispensable technique in modern surface and materials science for the determination of chemical bonding. The accuracy of chemical-state determination relies, however, on a trustworthy calibration of the binding energy (BE) scale, which is a nontrivial task due to the lack of an internal BE reference. One approach, proposed in the early days of XPS, employs the C 1s spectra of an adventitious carbon layer, which is present on all surfaces exposed to air. Despite accumulating criticism, pointing to the unknown origin and composition of the adventitious carbon, this is by far the most commonly used method today for all types of samples, not necessarily electrically insulating. Alarmingly, as revealed by our survey of recent XPS literature, the calibration procedure based on the C 1s peak of adventitious carbon is highly arbitrary, which results in incorrect spectral interpretation, contradictory results, and generates a large spread in reported BE values for elements even present in the same chemical state. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the status quo of XPS with a historical perspective, provide the technique’s operating principles, resolve myths associated with C 1s referencing, and offer a comprehensive account of recent findings. Owing to the huge volume of XPS literature produced each year, the consequences of improper referencing are dramatic. Our intention is to promote awareness within a growing XPS community as to the problems reported over the last six decades and present a guide with best practice for using the C 1s BE referencing method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biesinger, M. C. (2022) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153681 · Cited by 774
Jeong, S., Mai, H. D., Nguyen, T. K., Youn, J.-S., Nam, K.-H., Park, C.-M., & Jeon, K.-J. (2021) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120227 · Cited by 44
Van Den Berghe, M., Merino, N., Nealson, K. H., & West, A. J. (2021) · Geobiology · doi:10.1111/gbi.12457 · Cited by 20
TEM analysis and molecular dynamics simulation of graphene coated Al-Cu micro joints
Mypati, O., Kumar, P. P., Pal, S. K., & Srirangam, P. (2022) · Carbon Trends · doi:10.1016/j.cartre.2022.100223 · Cited by 12
Yeom, H.-I., Kim, J., Jeon, G.-J., Park, J., Han, D. U., Kim, J., Kim, K. M., Shong, B., & Park, S.-H. K. (2023) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/d2tc03751c · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Greczynski, G., & Hultman, L.
- Venue
- Progress in Materials Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 107
- Pages
- 100591
- ISSN
- 0079-6425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2965295081
- Cited by
- 2,528
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 67.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Towards reliable binding energy referencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100591
- The paper
- Greczynski, G., & Hultman, L. (2020). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Towards reliable binding energy referencing. Progress in Materials Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100591
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.