Cited by 31Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningWomen's cancer prevention and managementDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging

Patterns and determinants of mammography screening in Lebanese women

Open access
Elias, Nadia, Bou-Orm, Ibrahim R., Adib, Salim M.·2017·Preventive Medicine Reports

Abstract

The associations of ever using and/or repeating a mammography test with psychosocial and socio-demographic factors were surveyed in 2014 among Lebanese women ≥ 40. A sample of 2400 women was selected across Lebanon. Variables with significant bivariate associations with various types of behaviors were entered in multivariate analysis. Of the total, 105 women (4·4%) had never heard of mammography as a tool for early breast cancer detection. Among the remaining 2295, 45% had ever used it, of whom 10% had obtained it for the first time within the 12 months preceding the survey. Repeaters were 67% of 926 women who had the time opportunity to do so (median lifetime frequency: 2). Older age, higher socio-economic status (SES) and living within the Greater Beirut (GB) area were significantly associated with ever-use. Within GB, psychosocial factors such as perceived susceptibility and benefits were most strongly associated with ever-use. Outside GB, socio-economic advantage seemed to mostly affect ever-use. Only 4% reported opposition from husbands to their mammography, and husband's support was significant for adherence to mammography guidelines mostly outside GB. Higher education emerged also as a significant socio-demographic determinant for ever-repeating in all regions. Perceived comfort of the previous test strongly affected the likelihood of repeating it. Providing mammography free-of-charge may alleviate some obstacles among women with socio-economic disadvantage. Stressing that good results one year do not make the cancer less likely or repeating the test less important, as well as improving the comfort of mammography testing could ensure test repeating.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.12.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher perceived seriousness of the disease is associated with screening attendance.

    “Higher perceived susceptibility and seriousness of the disease, and personal vulnerability have been associated with screening attendance [11,17,20,21].”

    From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results section (Lifetime mammography use) reports that higher perceived severity was significantly associated with ever-use in the initial analysis. But the Discussion says there was an absence of effect associated with perceived severity after multivariate modeling, so the unqualified claim overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Perceived benefits such as reassurance of not having cancer or detecting cancer at a treatable stage are positively related to cancer screening.

    “Perceived benefits such as reassurance of not having cancer or detecting cancer at a treatable stage have been positively related to cancer screening [8,11,14,17,20].”

    From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results (Lifetime mammography use; page unavailable) report that higher perceived benefits were significantly associated with ever having a mammogram. The Methods (Instrument and variables; page unavailable) define those benefits as perceived test efficacy, but do not identify reassurance of not having cancer or detection at a treatable stage as the benefits measured. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Perceived ease of access may facilitate screening attendance at healthcare facilities.

    “Conversely, perceived ease of access may facilitate screening attendance at healthcare facilities [20].”

    From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results (Multivariate modeling of mammography-associated behaviors) associate ease of access with ever-use of mammography among Lebanese women both within and outside Greater Beirut. This supports the claim for mammography screening, but the source does not establish the broader claim about screening attendance at healthcare facilities generally. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Higher perceived susceptibility is associated with screening attendance.

    “Higher perceived susceptibility and seriousness of the disease, and personal vulnerability have been associated with screening attendance [11,17,20,21].”
  • Personal vulnerability is associated with screening attendance.

    “Higher perceived susceptibility and seriousness of the disease, and personal vulnerability have been associated with screening attendance [11,17,20,21].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Abou-Daoud K.T. Morbidity from cancer in Lebanon Cancer 19 9 1966 1293 1300 5919063
  2. Adib S.M. El Saghir N.S. Ammar W. Guidelines for breast cancer screening in Lebanon public health communication J. Med. Liban. 57 2 2008 72 74 19623881
  3. Adib S.M. Sabbah M.A. Hlais S. Hanna P. Research in action: mammography utilization following breast cancer awareness campaigns in Lebanon 2002–05 East Mediterr. Health J. 15 2009 6 18 19469422
  4. Arevian M. Noureddine S. Abboud S. Beliefs related to breast cancer and breast cancer screening among Lebanese Armenian women Health Care Women Int. 32 11 2011 972 989 21978144
  5. Barth R.J. Jr. Gibson G.R. Carney P.A. Mott L.A. Becher R.D. Poplack S.P. Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 184 1 2005 324 329 15615996
  6. Duport N. Ancelle-Park R. Boussac-Zarebska M. Uhry Z. Bloch J. Are breast cancer screening practices associated with sociodemographic status and healthcare access? Analysis of a French cross-sectional study Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 17 3 2008 218 224 18414192
  7. Elwood M. McNoe B. Smith T. Bandaranayake M. Doyle T.C. Once is enough–why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme N. Z. Med. J. 111 1066 1998 180 183 9640316
  8. Ferlay J. Shin H.R. Bray F. Forman D. Mathers C. Parkin D.M. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer: GLOBOCAN Int. J. Cancer 127 12 2010 2893 2917 21351269
  9. Gierisch J.M. Earp J.A. Brewer N.T. Rimer B.K. Longitudinal predictors of nonadherence to maintenance of mammography Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 19 4 2010 1103 1111 PMC2852896 20354125
  10. Haddad F.G. Kourie H.R. Adib S.M. Trends in mammography utilization for breast cancer screening in a Middle-Eastern country: Lebanon 2005–2013 Cancer Epidemiol. 39 6 2015 819 824 26651440
  11. Howard D.H. Adams E.K. Mammography rates after the 2009 US preventive services task force breast cancer screening recommendation Prev. Med. 55 5 2012 485 487 23000441
  12. Lakkis N.A. Adib S.M. Osman M.H. Musharafieh U.M. Hamadeh G.N. Breast cancer in Lebanon: incidence and comparison to regional and western countries Cancer Epidemiol. 34 3 2010 221 225 20413361
  13. Mayne L. Earp J. Initial and repeat mammography screening: different behaviors/different predictors J. Rural. Health 19 1 2003 63 71 12585776
  14. Peek M.E. Han J.H. Disparities in screening mammography J. Gen. Intern. Med. 19 2 2004 184 194 15009798 PMC1492136
  15. Petro-Nustas W.I. Factors associated with mammography utilization among Jordanian women J. Transcult. Nurs. 12 4 2001 284 291 11989219
  16. Salman K.F. Health beliefs and practices related to cancer screening among Arab Muslim women in an urban community Health Care Women Int. 33 1 2012 45 74 22150266
  17. Secginli S. Nahcivan N.O. Factors associated with breast cancer screening behaviours in a sample of Turkish women: a questionnaire survey Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 43 2 2006 161 171 16427965
  18. Shamseddine A. Sibai A.M. Gehchan N. Cancer incidence in postwar Lebanon: findings from the first national population-based registry, 1998 Ann. Epidemiol. 14 9 2004 663 668 15380797
  19. White E. Miglioretti D.L. Yankaskas B.C. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 96 24 2004 1832 1839 15601639
  20. Wu T.Y. Ronis D. Correlates of recent and regular mammography screening among Asian-American women J. Adv. Nurs. 65 11 2009 2434 2446 19761457

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elias, N., Bou-Orm, I. R., & Adib, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Saint Joseph University (LB)
  • American University of Beirut (LB)
Corresponding author
Bou-Orm, Ibrahim R.
Venue
Preventive Medicine Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
5
Pages
187-193
ISSN
2211-3355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2566133758
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Roche-International
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Keywords
mammography screening, breast cancer screening, screening uptake, screening adherence, repeat screening, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, socioeconomic status, husband support, educational attainment, Lebanese women, Greater Beirut

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review