Cited by 14Eating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Weight loss expectations and determinants in a large community-based sample

Open access
Pétré, Benoit, Scheen, André, Ziegler, Olivier, Donneau, Anne-Françoise, Dardenne, Nadia, Husson, Eddy, Albert, Adelin, Guillaume, Michèle·2018·Preventive Medicine Reports

Abstract

While weight-loss expectations have primarily been studied in people enrolled in weight-loss programs, the present study explores patient expectations about weight-loss and identifies related determinants in a large, non-clinical population. 3916 volunteers (age > 18 years) participated in 2012 in a community-based survey in the French-speaking region of Belgium. Participants were asked to define "dream", "goal", "happy", "acceptable", and "disappointed" weights. Other self-reported measures were used to determine each participant's body mass index (BMI), body image discrepancy (BID), subjective norm (SN), weight loss activity, weight history, quality of life (QoL), and demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. The study focused on the determinants of unrealistic weight-loss "goal" (≥10% of initial weight). Results showed median weight loss targets ranged from 5 kg ("disappointed" weight loss) to 21 kg ("dreamed" weight loss). Respondents considered the recommended weight-loss target (5-10%) disappointing. Severe and morbid obesity categories are at high risk of unrealistic weight loss goal. Unrealistic weight-loss goals was associated with female gender, weight loss activity, overweight history and lower QoL in overweight and moderate obesity respondents. These findings confirm the urgent need to help patients accept more modest weight loss outcomes and the need for personalized care that considers the patient's specific profile and both weight loss expectations and determinants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.08.005

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This finding adds to existing literature demonstrating significant disparities between patients' expectations and what is recommended by health care providers.

    “This finding adds to the existing pool of literature demonstrating significant disparities between patients' expectations and what is recommended by health care providers [30, 31], emphasizing the importance of educating patients on the range of potential weight loss outcomes and treatment response heterogeneity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pétré, B., Scheen, A., Ziegler, O., Donneau, A.-F., Dardenne, N., Husson, E., Albert, A., & Guillaume, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège (BE)
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR)
  • University of Liège (BE)
Venue
Preventive Medicine Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
12
Pages
12-19
ISSN
2211-3355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885750157
Cited by
14
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • Belgian Public Health Authorities (50WLL/3/3/136)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight loss expectations, weight loss goals, body image discrepancy, subjective norms, quality of life, obesity, overweight, body mass index, gender differences, individualized care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review