Cited by 30Physical Activity and HealthChild Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Screen-time during the after-school period: A contextual perspective

Open access
Haycraft, Emma, Sherar, Lauren B., Griffiths, Paula, Biddle, Stuart J.H., Pearson, Natalie·2020·Preventive Medicine Reports

Abstract

Sedentary screen-time is an increasingly prevalent behaviour, associated with a range of adverse health outcomes. Sedentary time and screen-use increase during adolescence, making this age group a prime target for behaviour change interventions. Better understanding the context in which sedentary screen-behaviours occur is important for ensuring future interventions have maximum impact. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of adolescents' sedentary screen-time in the after-school and weekday evening periods, and to examine associations between contextual factors (location within the home and who they were with) and after-school/evening screen-time. Time that UK adolescents (N = 204, aged 11 or 12 years, 61.4% girls) spent using various screens was measured using a detailed three-day time-use diary completed at home. Adolescents reported the start and end time for each screen-based activity, where they were, and who they were with. Weekday (Monday-Friday) data were analysed with a focus on the after-school (3-6 pm) and evening periods (6-10.45 pm). Young adolescents spend around a third of their weekday evening leisure-time using screens, with boys engaging in slightly more screen-use than girls. The majority of after-school and weekday evening time at home was spent with family or siblings, with less than 1% spent with friends. Adolescents who spent more time alone after school reported greater screen-use. Greater time spent at home, in the lounge (living room) or bedroom was associated with greater screen-use. These findings highlight the value of devising family-based health-promotion interventions which target after-school/leisure-time screen-use in an effort to reduce young adolescents' sedentary recreational screen-time behaviours.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101116

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 30

Authors
Haycraft, E., Sherar, L. B., Griffiths, P., Biddle, S. J. H., & Pearson, N.
Affiliations
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • University of Southern Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Haycraft, Emma
Venue
Preventive Medicine Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
19
Pages
101116
ISSN
2211-3355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021945391
Cited by
30
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2020-12-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
British Heart Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
sedentary screen time, adolescents, contextual factors, family environment, family presence, time diaries, family intervention, health promotion, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review