Cited by 8Treatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Withdrawal symptoms after discontinuation of a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant: A case report and review of the literature

Cosci, Fiammetta·2017·Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmip.2016.11.001

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cosci, F.
Affiliations
University of Florence (IT)
Corresponding author
Cosci, Fiammetta
Venue
Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
1-2
Pages
81-84
ISSN
2468-1717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2561858173
Cited by
8
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
antidepressant withdrawal symptoms, mirtazapine, noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants, antidepressant discontinuation, tapering, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review