Cited by 123Anesthesia and Pain ManagementPain Management and Opioid UsePediatric Pain Management Techniques

Foot and hand massage as an intervention for postoperative pain

Wang, Hsiao-Lan, Keck, Juanita F.·2004·Pain Management Nursing

Abstract

Physiological responses to pain create harmful effects that prolong the body's recovery after surgery. Patients routinely report mild to moderate pain even though pain medications have been administered. Complementary strategies based on sound research findings are needed to supplement postoperative pain relief using pharmacologic management. Foot and hand massage has the potential to assist in pain relief. Massaging the feet and hands stimulates the mechanoreceptors that activate the "nonpainful" nerve fibers, preventing pain transmission from reaching consciousness. The purpose of this pretest-posttest design study was to investigate whether a 20-minute foot and hand massage (5 minutes to each extremity), which was provided 1 to 4 hours after a dose of pain medication, would reduce pain perception and sympathetic responses among postoperative patients. A convenience sample of 18 patients rated pain intensity and pain distress using a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale. They reported decreases in pain intensity from 4.65 to 2.35 (t = 8.154, p <.001) and in pain distress from 4.00 to 1.88 (t = 5.683, p <.001). Statistically significant decreases in sympathetic responses to pain (i.e., heart rate and respiratory rate) were observed although blood pressure remained unchanged. The changes in heart rate and respiratory rate were not clinically significant. The patients experienced moderate pain after they received pain medications. This pain was reduced by the intervention, thus supporting the effectiveness of massage in postoperative pain management. Foot and hand massage appears to be an effective, inexpensive, low-risk, flexible, and easily applied strategy for postoperative pain management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmn.2004.01.002

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, H.-L., & Keck, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Health (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Hsiao-Lan
Venue
Pain Management Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
59-65
ISSN
1524-9042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017463832
Cited by
122
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain Management Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
foot massage, hand massage, postoperative pain, complementary pain management, mechanoreceptors, sympathetic response, heart rate, respiratory rate, pain intensity, pain-related distress, postoperative recovery
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analgesics, Blood Pressure, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Foot, Hand, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Massage, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Postoperative Pain, Respiration, Severity of Illness Index, Midwestern United States, Clinical Nursing Research, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review