Cited by 49Pain Management and Opioid UseOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Use of self-management interventions for chronic pain management: a comparison between rural and nonrural residents

Open access
Eaton, Linda H., Langford, Dale J., Meins, Alexa R., Rue, Tessa, Tauben, David J., Doorenbos, Ardith Z.·2018·Pain Management Nursing

Abstract

Individuals with chronic pain who live in rural communities often lack access to pain specialists and rely on primary care providers who may be less prepared. Research has indicated that rural residents with chronic pain are more likely to receive an opioid prescription than nonrural residents. Although self-management approaches are available for chronic pain management, it is unclear to what extent rural residents use these interventions. This study compares usage of self-management interventions and opioid-based analgesics for chronic pain management between rural and nonrural residents. This study is a secondary analysis of baseline data from a randomized controlled trial evaluating a telehealth intervention for chronic pain management. Participants, recruited from primary care clinics, were 65 rural residents and 144 nonrural residents with similar demographic characteristics. Differences in the use of self-management interventions, pain intensity, and opioid dose were evaluated between rural and nonrural residents. Rural residents (n = 50, 77%) were less likely to use self-management interventions compared with nonrural residents (n = 133, 92%) (p = .019). Opioids were taken for pain relief by 76% of the rural residents compared with 52% of the nonrural residents. A disparity exists in the use of self-management interventions for chronic pain management by rural residents compared with nonrural residents. Further study is needed to determine if this is related to the lack of access to specialists and/or pain management training of primary care providers. Nurses can play an essential role in addressing this disparity by educating patients about self-management interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmn.2017.09.004

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eaton, L. H., Langford, D. J., Meins, A. R., Rue, T., Tauben, D. J., & Doorenbos, A. Z.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Eaton, Linda H.
Venue
Pain Management Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
8-13
ISSN
1524-9042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768359248
Cited by
49
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain Management Nursing (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01NR012450, K24NR015340)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic pain management, self-management interventions, urban-rural differences, opioid use, primary care, telehealth intervention, pain intensity, opioid dose, nurse-led patient education
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Adult, Aged, Complementary Therapies, Female, Humans, Male, Massage, Middle Aged, Montana, Oregon, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rural Population, Temperature, Washington, Wyoming, Chronic Pain, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review