Cited by 39Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Management and Opioid UsePain Mechanisms and Treatments

Cannabis for Chronic Pain: A Rapid Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials

Longo, Riana, Oudshoorn, Abe, Befus, Deanna·2021·Pain Management Nursing

Abstract

Background The high prevalence of inadequately managed chronic pain indicates the need for alternative and multimodal treatment options. Use of cannabinoids in medicine is becoming a growing area of interest, specifically in the context of chronic pain. The efficacy of cannabinoids for the treatment of chronic pain is not well established. Aims The objectives of this rapid systematic literature review are to summarize the efficacy and secondary effects of cannabinoids for chronic pain management. Design Rapid systematic review of randomized control trials. Participants Individuals with chronic pain (n = 1352). Methods Embase, Cochrane, PubMed, and CINAHL databases were searched. Inclusion criteria included cannabis of any formulation used to treat chronic pain of any origin. Results Thirteen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Five demonstrated moderate analgesic effects of cannabis for chronic pain, and eight concluded there were no significant impacts on pain in the cannabis-treated group versus the control group. Conclusions Evidence on the efficacy of cannabinoids for chronic pain shows patient-perceived benefit but inconsistent other treatment effects. These findings indicate cannabinoids may have a modest analgesic effect for chronic neuropathic pain conditions, and that the use of cannabinoids is relatively safe, with few severe adverse events. This review concludes that cannabinoids may have a potential role in chronic pain management. Inconsistent evidence on the efficacy of cannabis to treat chronic pain indicates the need for more studies on a larger scale. Clinicians should draw on available evidence and consider cannabinoids as a potential approach to chronic pain management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.11.006

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Longo, R., Oudshoorn, A., & Befus, D.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Longo, Riana
Venue
Pain Management Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
141-149
ISSN
1524-9042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3114214367
Cited by
39
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain Management Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
cannabis, cannabinoids, chronic pain, analgesic efficacy, neuropathic pain, adverse events, pain management, treatment safety
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Cannabinoids, Cannabis, Humans, Neuralgia, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review