Cannabis for Chronic Pain: A Rapid Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials
Abstract
Background The high prevalence of inadequately managed chronic pain indicates the need for alternative and multimodal treatment options. Use of cannabinoids in medicine is becoming a growing area of interest, specifically in the context of chronic pain. The efficacy of cannabinoids for the treatment of chronic pain is not well established. Aims The objectives of this rapid systematic literature review are to summarize the efficacy and secondary effects of cannabinoids for chronic pain management. Design Rapid systematic review of randomized control trials. Participants Individuals with chronic pain (n = 1352). Methods Embase, Cochrane, PubMed, and CINAHL databases were searched. Inclusion criteria included cannabis of any formulation used to treat chronic pain of any origin. Results Thirteen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Five demonstrated moderate analgesic effects of cannabis for chronic pain, and eight concluded there were no significant impacts on pain in the cannabis-treated group versus the control group. Conclusions Evidence on the efficacy of cannabinoids for chronic pain shows patient-perceived benefit but inconsistent other treatment effects. These findings indicate cannabinoids may have a modest analgesic effect for chronic neuropathic pain conditions, and that the use of cannabinoids is relatively safe, with few severe adverse events. This review concludes that cannabinoids may have a potential role in chronic pain management. Inconsistent evidence on the efficacy of cannabis to treat chronic pain indicates the need for more studies on a larger scale. Clinicians should draw on available evidence and consider cannabinoids as a potential approach to chronic pain management.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is weak evidence for patient-perceived benefits of cannabinoids for chronic pain.
“There is weak evidence for patient-perceived benefits [85].”
From Cannabis, cannabinoids and health: a review of evidence on risks and medical benefits (2025) · cites this paper as [85]
Cites
Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Finnerup, N. B., Attal, N., Haroutounian, S., McNicol, E., Baron, R., Dworkin, R. H., Gilron, I., Haanpää, M., Hansson, P., Jensen, T. S., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70251-0 · Cited by 3,980 · see citing works
A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11
Treede, R.-D., Rief, W., Barke, A., Aziz, Q., Bennett, M. I., Benoliel, R., Cohen, M., Evers, S., Finnerup, N. B., First, M. B., et al. (2015) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000160 · Cited by 2,822 · see citing works
Smoked cannabis for chronic neuropathic pain: a randomized controlled trial
Ware, M. A., Wang, T., Shapiro, S., Robinson, A., Ducruet, T., Huynh, T., Gamsa, A., Bennett, G. J., & Collet, J.-P. (2010) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.091414 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Portenoy, R. K., Ganae-Motan, E. D., Allende, S., Yanagihara, R., Shaiova, L., Weinstein, S., McQuade, R., Wright, S., & Fallon, M. T. (2012) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2012.01.003 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
The Effects of Nabilone on Sleep in Fibromyalgia: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Ware, M. A., Fitzcharles, M.-A., Joseph, L., & Shir, Y. (2010) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181c76f70 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Haroutounian, S., Ratz, Y., Ginosar, Y., Furmanov, K., Saifi, F., Meidan, R., & Davidson, E. (2016) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000364 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Lynch, M. E., & Ware, M. A. (2015) · Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s11481-015-9600-6 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Perrot, S., & Lantéri‐Minet, M. (2019) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.1378 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cannabis, cannabinoids and health: a review of evidence on risks and medical benefits
Hoch, E., Volkow, N. D., Friemel, C. M., Lorenzetti, V., Freeman, T. P., & Hall, W. (2025) · European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s00406-024-01880-2 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“There is weak evidence for patient-perceived benefits [85].”
Cannabis-Based Products for Chronic Pain: An Updated Systematic Review
Chou, R., Fu, R., Ahmed, A. Y., & Morasco, B. J. (2026) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/annals-25-03152 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Longo, R., Oudshoorn, A., & Befus, D.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Longo, Riana
- Venue
- Pain Management Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-149
- ISSN
- 1524-9042 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3114214367
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain Management Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- cannabis, cannabinoids, chronic pain, analgesic efficacy, neuropathic pain, adverse events, pain management, treatment safety
- MeSH terms
- Analgesics, Cannabinoids, Cannabis, Humans, Neuralgia, Chronic Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review