Fatigue and Fatigability in Older Adults
Abstract
Fatigue is believed to be a common complaint among older adults; however, multiple studies of self-reported fatigue across the lifespan have found this may not be the case. To explain this paradox, this article considers "fatigability"-a phenotype characterized by the relationship between an individual's perceived fatigue and the activity level with which the fatigue is associated. Fatigability may be measured by combining self-report measures of fatigue with performance of physical or cognitive activities, provided that the work of the activity is known or can be standardized. Doing so prevents self-pacing and allows meaningful comparisons across subjects and between studies. Increased fatigability with aging may arise from a variety of factors including age-related changes in energy production or utilization, and inflammatory mechanisms. A few published intervention studies have targeted fatigue in older adults, though none have examined fatigability specifically. Because fatigue may represent a physiologic warning system, future clinical studies may benefit from a focus on fatigability, where both symptoms and function are considered.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Different fatigue patterns by age may be due to increased use of planning and activity pacing in older individuals, to account for greater fatigability.
“Different fatigue patterns by age may be due to increased use of planning and activity pacing70 in older individuals, to account for greater fatigability71.”
From Ecological momentary assessment of pain, fatigue, depressive, and cognitive symptoms reveals significant daily variability in multiple sclerosis (2017) · cites this paper as [70]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 262
- Authors
- Eldadah, B. A.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eldadah, Basil A.
- Venue
- PM&R
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 406-413
- ISSN
- 1934-1482 (ISSN-L)
- 1934-1563
- OpenAlex
- W2010677499
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PM&R (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Keywords
- fatigue, fatigability, older adults, aging, subjective fatigue, physical activity, cognitive activity, self-pacing, energy metabolism, inflammation, fatigue interventions
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aging, Energy Metabolism, Fatigue, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Motor Activity, Oxygen Consumption, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review