Cited by 109Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesMental Health Research TopicsCancer survivorship and care

Ecological momentary assessment of pain, fatigue, depressive, and cognitive symptoms reveals significant daily variability in multiple sclerosis

Open access
Kratz, Anna L., Murphy, Susan L., Braley, Tiffany J.·2017·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To describe the daily variability and patterns of pain, fatigue, depressed mood, and cognitive function in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). Design Repeated-measures observational study of seven consecutive days of home monitoring, including ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of symptoms. Multilevel mixed models were used to analyze data. Setting General community. Participants Ambulatory adults (N=107) with MS recruited through [Masked] and surrounding community. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s) EMA measures of pain, fatigue, depressed mood, and cognitive function rated on a 0–10 scale, collected five times a day for seven days. Results Cognitive function and depressed mood exhibited more stable within-person patterns compared to pain and fatigue, which varied considerably within-person. All symptoms increased in intensity across the day (all p<0.02) with fatigue showing the most substantial increase. Notably, this diurnal increase varied by sex and age; women showed a continuous increase from wake to bedtime, whereas fatigue plateaued after 7PM for men (wake-bed B=1.04, p=0.004). For the oldest subgroup, diurnal increases were concentrated to the middle of the day compared to younger subgroups, which showed an earlier onset of fatigue increase and sustained increases until bed time (wake-3pm B=0.04, p=0.01; wake-7pm B=0.03, p=0.02). Diurnal patterns of cognitive function varied by education; those with advanced college degrees showed a more stable pattern across the day, with significant differences compared to those with bachelor-level degrees in the evening (wake-7pm B=−0.47, p=0.02; wake-bed B=−.45, p=0.04). Conclusions Findings suggest that chronic symptoms in MS are not static, even over a short time frame; rather, symptoms –fatigue and pain in particular - vary dynamically across and within days. Incorporation of EMA methods should be considered in the assessment of these chronic MS symptoms to enhance assessment and treatment strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.07.002

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

13 of 39 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Study design and conductnone given

    The single-item measures used to assess momentary symptoms have not been validated.

    “Use of single item measures that have not been validated to assess momentary symptoms is a limitation of this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [80] Kratz, 2016, Pain acceptance decouples the momentary associations between pain, pain interference, and physical activity in the daily lives of people with chronic pain and spinal cord injury, J Pain source
    • cites [81] Murphy, 2008, The impact of momentary pain and fatigue on physical activity in women with osteoarthritis, Arthritis Rheum source

      The ‘Subjective measures collected by the Actiwatch-S’ section describes momentary pain and fatigue ratings, supporting the use of single-item symptom measures. The Discussion identifies the 0–4 scale’s limited comparability with other studies, but does not say the symptom measures were unvalidated; it discusses Actiwatch-S validity separately. No page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [82] Allen, 2007, The value of measuring variability in osteoarthritis pain, J Rheumatol
    • cites [33] Kim, 2010, Novel method for measurement of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: Real-Time Digital Fatigue Score, J Rehabil Res Dev source
    • cites [35] Powell, 2017, Tracking daily fatigue fluctuations in multiple sclerosis: ecological momentary assessment provides unique insights, J Behav Med source

      In Method > Measures (page not available), the paper describes its single-item momentary fatigue measure and explicitly reports evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. Its Discussion identifies a different limitation—combining physical and mental fatigue in one item—not a lack of validation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Methodological studies of EMA of symptoms demonstrate that surveys relying on respondent recall, such as the baseline measures in this study, are biased toward peak (worst) and recent symptoms.

    “Methodological studies of EMA of symptoms demonstrate surveys that rely on respondent recall, such as the baseline measures in this study, are biased toward peak (worst) and recent symptoms76–78; EMA ratings may provide a more valid estimate of true symptom intensity compared to standardized surveys.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [76] Stone, 2005, Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: a consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic, Pers Soc Psychol B source
    • cites [77] Stone, 2000, Does the peak-end phenomenon observed in laboratory pain studies apply to real-world pain in rheumatoid arthritics?, J Pain source

      The Discussion states that peak and recent pain are overly represented in recalled ratings, supporting the claim for pain recall. The study examined patients with rheumatoid arthritis; it does not establish that recall-based surveys of symptoms generally have the same bias. Page numbers were not available in the supplied passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [78] Kratz, 2017, Pain, fatigue, and cognitive symptoms are temporally associated within but not across days in multiple sclerosis, Arch Phys Med Rehabil source

      The Study Limitations section (page not available in our copy) reports higher symptom ratings on surveys than on EMA, but says the reason is unclear. It does not establish that recall surveys are biased toward peak or recent symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    There are no standard, validated ecological momentary assessment measures of the symptoms examined in this study.

    “to our knowledge there are no standard, validated EMA measures of the symptoms examined in this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [80] Kratz, 2016, Pain acceptance decouples the momentary associations between pain, pain interference, and physical activity in the daily lives of people with chronic pain and spinal cord injury, J Pain source
    • cites [81] Murphy, 2008, The impact of momentary pain and fatigue on physical activity in women with osteoarthritis, Arthritis Rheum source

      The Subjective measures section describes the study’s 0–4 momentary pain and fatigue ratings, and the Discussion says this scale was chosen to reduce respondent burden rather than using the more common 0–10 scale. Neither passage says that standard, validated EMA measures of these symptoms do not exist; searches for validated EMA measures and symptom-scale validity found no such statement in our copy. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [82] Allen, 2007, The value of measuring variability in osteoarthritis pain, J Rheumatol
    • cites [33] Kim, 2010, Novel method for measurement of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: Real-Time Digital Fatigue Score, J Rehabil Res Dev source
    • cites [35] Powell, 2017, Tracking daily fatigue fluctuations in multiple sclerosis: ecological momentary assessment provides unique insights, J Behav Med source

      The Method > Measures section describes an adapted momentary fatigue item and reports evidence of its validity, but does not say that standard, validated EMA measures are unavailable. Searches for that assertion and related wording found no passage addressing the availability of such measures for the symptoms in the citing study. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    For the oldest subgroup, diurnal increases in fatigue were concentrated to the middle of the day compared to younger subgroups, which showed an earlier onset of fatigue increase and sustained increases until bed time (wake-3pm B=0.04, p=0.01; wake-7pm B=0.03, p=0.02).

    “For the oldest subgroup, diurnal increases were concentrated to the middle of the day compared to younger subgroups, which showed an earlier onset of fatigue increase and sustained increases until bed time (wake-3pm B=0.04, p=0.01; wake-7pm B=0.03, p=0.02).”
    • Also stated in: § Individual differences in diurnal symptom patterns · plain
      “There was a significant difference by age in change in fatigue ratings from wake to 3PM (ageXtime B=0.04, SE=0.01, t=2.44, p=0.01) and from wake to 7PM (ageXtime B=0.03, SE=0.01, t=2.29, p=0.02).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Pain had 41% within-person variance and 59% between-person variance.

    “In contrast, the between-person variance for pain accounted for a relatively larger proportion of the variance (59%), as compared to within-person variance (41%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
  • May combine two claims. 18
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Daily Pain was assessed with the PROMIS pain intensity 3-item short-form which has demonstrated validity across conditions.

    “Daily Pain was assessed with the PROMIS pain intensity 3-item short-form 61,62 which has demonstrated validity across conditions63,64.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [61] Schneider, 2012, Psychometric characteristics of daily diaries for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R)): a preliminary investigation, Qual Life Res source

      The Methods > Measures passage says this study used a six-item daily PROMIS pain interference short-form, not a three-item pain intensity short-form. The paper also does not establish validity of the claimed instrument across conditions. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [62] Chen, 2012, Development and Analysis of PROMIS Pain Intensity Scale, Qual Life Res

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [63] Cook, 2015, Establishing a common metric for self-reported pain: linking BPI Pain Interference and SF-36 Bodily Pain Subscale scores to the PROMIS Pain Interference metric, Qual Life Res source

      The Methods—Measures section describes validity evidence for the PROMIS Pain Interference item bank, not the PROMIS Pain Intensity 3-item short form. Searches for the 3-item intensity form and validity across conditions found no passage addressing that claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [64] Christodoulou, 2014, Measuring daily fatigue using a brief scale adapted from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS (R)), Qual Life Res source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premiseown data

    This finding is somewhat consistent with previous findings supporting the cognitive reserve hypothesis, that higher education mitigates cognitive problems associated with MS.

    “This finding is somewhat consistent with previous findings supporting the cognitive reserve hypothesis, that higher education mitigates cognitive problems associated with MS73–75.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [73] Sumowski, 2009, Cognitive reserve moderates the negative effect of brain atrophy on cognitive efficiency in multiple sclerosis, J Int Neuropsychol Soc source
    • cites [74] Sumowski, 2013, Cognitive reserve in multiple sclerosis, Mult Scler source
    • cites [75] Schneider, 2011, Peak and end effects in patients' daily recall of pain and fatigue: a within-subjects analysis, J Pain source

      The Discussion addresses peak-end effects in daily recall of pain and fatigue among patients with rheumatological conditions, not cognitive problems associated with MS. Searches for cognitive reserve, higher education, and MS found no passage addressing whether education mitigates those problems. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Daily Fatigue was assessed with the PROMIS fatigue 6-item short-form, which has demonstrated validity across conditions and ecological validity when administered in diary format, and has been linked to legacy fatigue measures in MS.

    “Daily Fatigue was assessed with the PROMIS fatigue 6-item short-form, which has demonstrated validity across conditions63,65,66 and ecological validity when administered in diary format67, and has been linked to legacy fatigue measures in MS66.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [63] Cook, 2015, Establishing a common metric for self-reported pain: linking BPI Pain Interference and SF-36 Bodily Pain Subscale scores to the PROMIS Pain Interference metric, Qual Life Res source

      The Methods (Measures) and Discussion describe the PROMIS Pain Interference measure and its links to legacy pain measures, not the PROMIS fatigue 6-item short form. Searches for diary-format validity and links to legacy fatigue measures in MS found no passage addressing those claims; the paper’s mention of MS concerns pain measures. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [65] Noonan, 2012, Measuring fatigue in persons with multiple sclerosis: creating a crosswalk between the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale and the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form, Qual Life Res source
    • cites [66] Stone, 2016, PROMIS fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference, pain behavior, physical function, depression, anxiety, and anger scales demonstrate ecological validity, J Clin Epidemiol source
    • cites [67] Singer, 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Different fatigue patterns by age may be due to increased use of planning and activity pacing in older individuals, to account for greater fatigability.

    “Different fatigue patterns by age may be due to increased use of planning and activity pacing70 in older individuals, to account for greater fatigability71.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [70] Eldadah, 2010, Fatigue and fatigability in older adults, PM R source
    • cites [71] Murphy, 2014, Activity pacing in daily life: a within-day analysis, Pain source

      The Results (Primary Analyses; page not provided) associate older age with more pacing behavior in adults with osteoarthritis, although the age association was marginal in the fatigue model (p = .06). The paper does not establish increased use of planning or show that pacing explains age-related fatigue patterns. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Daily Depressed Mood was assessed with the PROMIS 8-item short-form, which has been validated in MS.

    “Daily Depressed Mood was assessed with the PROMIS 8-item short-form, which has been validated in MS46.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46] Amtmann, 2014, Comparing CESD-10, PHQ-9, and PROMIS depression instruments in individuals with multiple sclerosis, Rehabil Psychol source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The PHQ-9 has been validated in MS.

    “The PHQ-9 has been validated in MS46,47 and provides clinical cut-points.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [46] Amtmann, 2014, Comparing CESD-10, PHQ-9, and PROMIS depression instruments in individuals with multiple sclerosis, Rehabil Psychol source
    • cites [47] Sjonnesen, 2012, Evaluation of the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as an assessment instrument for symptoms of depression in patients with multiple sclerosis, Postgrad Med source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Diurnal symptom patterns did not differ by MS subtype/duration or work status (all p>0.13).

    “Diurnal symptom patterns did not differ by MS subtype/duration or work status (all p>0.13).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The diurnal increase in fatigue varied by sex: women showed a continuous increase from wake to bedtime, whereas fatigue plateaued after 7PM for men (wake-bed B=1.04, p=0.004).

    “Notably, this diurnal increase varied by sex and age; women showed a continuous increase from wake to bedtime, whereas fatigue plateaued after 7PM for men (wake-bed B=1.04, p=0.004).”
    • Also stated in: § Individual differences in diurnal symptom patterns · plain
      “There was one significant finding for sex; there was a significant difference between men and women in terms of the change from waking to bedtime fatigue (sexXtime B=1.04, SE=0.36, t =2.92, p=0.004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Those with advanced degrees showed the most stable and those with a college education the most variable diurnal pattern of cognitive function.

    “A graph of cognitive function ratings (Figure 5) shows that in the context of overall very modest diurnal effects for all levels of education, those with advanced degrees showed the most stable and those with a college education the most variable diurnal pattern.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was a significant difference in the diurnal pattern of cognitive function by education level; those with an advanced degree were significantly different from those with a college education in changes from wake to 7PM (B=−0.47, p=0.02) and from wake to bedtime (B=−0.45, p=0.04).

    “There was a significant difference in the diurnal pattern of cognitive function by education level; those with an advanced degree were significantly different from those with a college education in terms of changes from wake to 7PM (educationXtime B=−0.47, SE=0.22, p=0.02) and from wake to bedtime (educationXtime B=−0.45, SE=0.22, p=0.04).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Diurnal patterns of cognitive function varied by education; those with advanced college degrees showed a more stable pattern across the day, with significant differences compared to those with bachelor-level degrees in the evening (wake-7pm B=−0.47, p=0.02; wake-bed B=−.45, p=0.04).

    “Diurnal patterns of cognitive function varied by education; those with advanced college degrees showed a more stable pattern across the day, with significant differences compared to those with bachelor-level degrees in the evening (wake-7pm B=−0.47, p=0.02; wake-bed B=−.45, p=0.04).”
    • Also stated in: § Individual differences in diurnal symptom patterns · plain
      “There was a significant difference in the diurnal pattern of cognitive function by education level; those with an advanced degree were significantly different from those with a college education in terms of changes from wake to 7PM (educationXtime B=−0.47, SE=0.22, p=0.02) and from wake to bedtime (educationXtime B=−0.45, SE=0.22, p=0.04).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Fatigue rises steadily across the day and peaks at bedtime for women, while fatigue ratings plateau at 7PM and decline toward bedtime for men.

    “A graph of fatigue ratings across the day (Figure 4) shows that while fatigue rises steadily across the day and peaks at bedtime for women, fatigue ratings plateau at 7PM and decline toward bedtime for men.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Cognitive function and depressed mood exhibited more stable within-person patterns compared to pain and fatigue, which varied considerably within-person.

    “Cognitive function and depressed mood exhibited more stable within-person patterns compared to pain and fatigue, which varied considerably within-person.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Levels of other symptoms were also modest and yet demonstrated higher within-person variability.

    “However, levels of other symptoms were also modest and yet demonstrated higher within-person variability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Chronic symptoms in MS are not static, even over a short time frame; rather, symptoms - fatigue and pain in particular - vary dynamically across and within days.

    “Findings suggest that chronic symptoms in MS are not static, even over a short time frame; rather, symptoms –fatigue and pain in particular - vary dynamically across and within days.”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
      “Consistent with previous research32,34,35, these data show that in ambulatory people with MS, symptoms are not static, but are experienced dynamically.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Data were adequately normally-distributed for parametric statistical analyses.

    “Data were adequately normally-distributed for parametric statistical analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    One hundred and eight participants enrolled and completed baseline surveys; one participant withdrew before starting home monitoring, and data from the remaining 107 were analyzed.

    “One hundred and eight participants enrolled and completed the baseline surveys. One participant withdrew before starting home monitoring; data from the remaining 107 were analyzed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    This study is the first to use EMA to examine daily variability and temporal patterns of pain, fatigue, depressed mood, and perceived cognitive function in MS.

    “This study is the first to use EMA to examine daily variability and temporal patterns of pain, fatigue, depressed mood, and perceived cognitive function in MS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    All EMA measures showed high levels of shared variance with EOD diary measures of the same constructs, supporting convergent validity of the EMA items.

    “All EMA measures showed high levels of shared variance with EOD diary measures of the same constructs, supporting convergent validity of the EMA items (Table 2.).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    EMA data were 83.4% complete.

    “For EMA measures, 83.4% (3,145/3,745[35*107]) of the data were complete; 17 participants had no missing data and 55 had ≤3 missing data points.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Validated self-report measures were used to characterize the sample.

    “Validated self-report measures were used to characterize the sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People with MS often experience considerable disease course-variability and illness uncertainty, which are associated with emotional distress.

    “People with MS often experience considerable disease course-variability and illness uncertainty, which are associated with emotional distress29–31,69.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [29] Randolph, 2005, Depression and fatigue in relapsing-remitting MS: the role of symptomatic variability, Mult Scler J source
    • cites [30] Kroencke, 2001, Depression during exacerbations in multiple sclerosis: the importance of uncertainty, Mult Scler source
    • cites [31] Kroencke, 1999, Stress and coping in multiple sclerosis: exacerbation, remission and chronic subgroups, Mult Scler source
    • cites [69] Dilorenzo, 2008, A qualitative investigation of adaptation in older individuals with multiple sclerosis, Disabil Rehabil source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Medical Institutional Review Board approval was granted prior to study initiation.

    “Medical Institutional Review Board approval was granted prior to study initiation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Physician diagnosis and MS subtype were confirmed through medical record review.

    “Physician diagnosis and MS subtype were confirmed through medical record review.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The FSS is a validated 9-item measure; average scores of ≥4 are suggestive of fatigue.

    “Fatigue severity was assessed with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)40, a validated 9-item measure; average scores of ≥4 are suggestive of fatigue40–44.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [40] Krupp, 1989, The Fatigue Severity Scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus, Arch Neurol source
    • cites [41] Learmonth, 2013, Psychometric properties of the Fatigue Severity Scale and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, J Neurol Sci source
    • cites [42] Lerdal, 2010, Psychometric properties of the Fatigue Severity Scale: Rasch analyses of responses in a Norwegian and a Swedish MS cohort, Mult Scler J source
    • cites [43] Mills, 2009, Rasch analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale in multiple sclerosis, Mult Scler source
    • cites [44] Mills, 2007, Rasch analysis of the fatigue severity scale in multiple sclerosis, Eur J Neurol

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Improved knowledge of symptom patterns in multiple sclerosis could help refine interventions to target the most severe or impactful symptoms, minimize treatments when they are not needed, develop new interventions and prevention strategies, and guide timing of medications and selection of self-management strategies.

    “Improved knowledge of symptom patterns in MS could help refine interventions to target the most severe or impactful symptoms, minimize treatments when they are not needed, develop new interventions and prevention strategies, and guide timing of medications and selection of self-management strategies83.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [83]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Ecological momentary assessment could increase understanding of multiple sclerosis symptoms and gauge effectiveness of symptomatic therapies for some of the most common and consequential multiple sclerosis symptoms.

    “which could increase our understanding of MS symptoms, and gauge effectiveness of symptomatic therapies for some of the most common and consequential MS symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Pain, fatigue, depressive, and cognitive symptoms are among the most common and consequential multiple sclerosis symptoms.
27 of 27
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Pain, fatigue, depressive, and cognitive symptoms are common targets of behavioral self-management interventions in multiple sclerosis.

    “Because this study focused on symptoms that are common targets of behavioral self-management interventions”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Pain, fatigue, depressive, and cognitive symptoms are among the most common and consequential multiple sclerosis symptoms.

    “some of the most common and consequential MS symptoms”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The broader multiple sclerosis population includes more disabled individuals than the ambulatory sample studied.

    “exclusion of the most disabled individuals could limit our ability to generalize findings to the broader MS population.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The daily measures of each construct used as comparators are more robust than the ecological momentary assessment items.

    “relative to more robust daily measures of each construct”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Chen, 2012, Development and Analysis of PROMIS Pain Intensity Scale, Qual Life Res, 20, 18

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kratz, A. L., Murphy, S. L., & Braley, T. J.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Kratz, Anna L.
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
98
Issue
11
Pages
2142-2150
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2738913041
Cited by
109
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R03NR014515)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (K01AR064275)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, pain, fatigue, depressive mood, cognitive function, diurnal variation, within-person variability, sex differences, age differences, educational attainment, symptom dynamics
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Circadian Rhythm, Cognition, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Pain, Pain Measurement, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-22.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-22.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review